Wilt went for sheer volume. My "volume" is actually quite low. I just tend to have a lot of sex with the girls I date. Anyone remember me saying how my ex claimed we had too much sex? (the current doesn't agree with that philosophy though. However, it's only been cookie stuff so far)
Which is worse? Lots of partners (assuming safe sex) or lots of experience with limited partners?
Anyway... Chicks suck bro! But I have to say, you have a unique look. You just have to find the chicks that dig that. And there are chicks that dif that huge tough guy look. But go for a meal over cookies if possible. If not, glut yourself on sweets!
Would hafta say lots of partners. I have slept with a few over 30 chicks. Lots of one nighers or weekers in my early twenties. It is not safe to do that. I would like to have just one that loved sex, was a little kinky, was a knock-out, cooked, cleaned, and well thats hard to find.
I would rather go for limited partners. Too many diseases nowadays.
The grudging though. It has to come naturally, isn't something you can cause or create
truly in life i seek what most others seek... i am a born romantic i want noithing more than to do the silly little things like love notes and whatnot... but masturbation gets really old...
Rich
is it better to be alone for the right reasons than to be with someone for the wrong? i go by that philosophy but i am truly alone these days
I go for somewhere in between. I'll date someone if I like them and am having fun even if I KNOW they aren't the one. You can learn something from everyone. But it is very wrong to date someone you don't even like just so you won't be alone.