curling said:HAnz what do you mean by discriminating? Lets say you own your own business and two guys one being straight and the other being gay both are equally qualified which one would you hire?
curling said:i apreciate the answers so far. Another question if ya'll don't mind are you as open about your homosexuality in the real world as you are here on the net?
HansNZ said:
How would I know what their sexual orientation is? If I did know, unless their sexual orientation gave them helpful insights into their job, I can't see it as being relevant. I suppose I would chose the one who I felt would be easiest to work with and most reliable.
I can imagine that some people may have an agenda based around sexuality. Discriminating against someone because they are straight is just the same as discriminating against them because they are gay. There are laws against this in my country.
Originally posted by HansNZ
I don't advertise my sexuality, but nor do I hide it. If I was confronted by homophobia in real life I would confront it as I do on here. I don't get confronted by it in life as I do on here so I am not so visibly vocal and gay in normal daily existence.
huntmaster said:I dont agree with the lifestyle--but I dont consider myself--homophobe.
curling said:
Is it discriminating? I mean if someone would feel more confortable about the other person because of a common bond or interest why shouldn't that person get to hire the person they are more like them? See what I am saying. Btw what country are you from?
huntmaster said:I dont agree with the lifestyle--but I dont consider myself--homophobe.
Y_Lifter said:
So if your company had a big fancy gathering where you and a guest were invited, you would bring your Partner and introduce him to the big Bosses as such ?
I work with several semi Openly Gay Men and this has NEVER happened at our company functions. Even though at the worker level we all know they have someone in their life.. They always arrive solo..
It's sad to me because I bet they wish they could feel comfortable bringing them, just like the straight guys bring their GF's
curling said:
Personally, I don't think there is a thing such as a homophobe. I think homophobe was a term the politically correct people put out there to label people with a phobe(make it look like it is there problem) that don't agree with the homosexuals lifestyle.
MuscularWarrier said:The fact is that Jesus has proclaimed that sodomy in which a man insert his/her penis in anothers buttocks is SODOMY and has such is a disgusting vulgar act which will bring sanction of hell upon the practiser.
My advise to dirty faggots is quit or you will go to hell.
Muscular Warrior
HansNZ said:
Well that is just your opinion. There is also no consensus among Christians about what Jesus said. In any case I could care less.
I might believe in a religion which says that there are UFOs full of aliens waiting to save us and only those who believe this or that are pure/will be saved etc. Just because I am convinced of this doesn't make it true.
I am not dirty. If you think my sexual practises are dirty then that is just your opinion.
Islamic fundamentalists think that Christians are blasphemous infidels who are going to hell, so i'll see you there muscular warrior.
curling said:
You don't believe in Islam now do you Hanz?
HansNZ said:
Nope. I am not a Muslim. That is another religion that attempts to hide its prejuidce towards homosexuality behind "God's word".
dballer said:
are any religions fag friendly???
dballer said:
are any religions fag friendly???
HansNZ said:
Well religious content or interpretation is altered by the attitudes of the society interpreting them. Some peple will say that Christianity is not anti-gay whereas others will insist that it condemns homosexuality.
I think the Western religions are the most hostile though - certainly a reflection of the cultures that invented them.
The religions of the pacific Islands and places like New Guinea are not traditionally homophobic. In fact gay practices are very much a part of the religious rites of many of these people.
dballer said:
If you have ever read the Bible.. you would see how crazy it would be to say that it does not condemn homosexuals. There are whole chapters talking about how God will annihilate them.
MuscularWarrier said:The fact is that Jesus has proclaimed that sodomy in which a man insert his/her penis in anothers buttocks is SODOMY and has such is a disgusting vulgar act which will bring sanction of hell upon the practiser.
My advise to dirty faggots is quit or you will go to hell.
Muscular Warrior
musclebrains said:
Care to cite those "whole chapters"?
dballer said:
Yeah.. true. I forgot about those pacific islands. They base alot of culture on sex.
If you have ever read the Bible.. you would see how crazy it would be to say that it does not condemn homosexuals. There are whole chapters talking about how God will annihilate them.
huntmaster said:are some homosexuals religiophobic???? sometimes--I think so
HansNZ said:
So you are saying that those "whole chapters" are the unadulterated words spoken by jesus and the saints?
dballer said:and this one too....
1 Corinthians 6:11 "Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God."
those are some. But if you wish me to type in the whole thing I will. It will just take alot of time.
curling said:We all know how homophobes feel about homosexuals so homosexuals what do ya'll think about homophobes? Does it bother ya'll that homophobes don't like ya'll's lifestyle or do you care?
dballer said:Lev 18:22-23 "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."
Lev 20:13 "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death."
1 Cor 6:9 "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals"
1 Tim 1:9-10 "realizing the fact that (civil) law is not made for a righteous man, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers"
Rom 1:26-27 "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error."
musclebrains said:
Those are not entire books, Dballer,a nd we've already discussed the very broad disagreement among scholars about the translations of those passages. Oxford is producing a new Bible next year that is a translation much more faithful to the original sense of the Bible.
dballer said:
Hanz... the Bible was written by profits whom had religious experiences during the time Christ was born. You MIGHT be able to use the "mixed up words" line if the message was not in soo many parts of the Bible.
curling said:Muscle brains which one are you gay or bi? I mean how can you be both(bi). Actually I think that is more perverted than just being gay because if you are bi you are obvioulsy attracted to females so you wouldn't need to do a man and if you do you are being perverted by choice then for sure.
dballer said:
I am sure they are. I am sure it will say all kinds of new things that will include rapists, molesters and all that stuff. See these days we want everyone to get into heaven.. if they follow the laws of Christ or not.
dballer said:
I am sure they are. I am sure it will say all kinds of new things that will include rapists, molesters and all that stuff. See these days we want everyone to get into heaven.. if they follow the laws of Christ or not.
dballer said:Lev 18:22-23 "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."
Lev 20:13 "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death."
1 Cor 6:9 "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals"
1 Tim 1:9-10 "realizing the fact that (civil) law is not made for a righteous man, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers"
Rom 1:26-27 "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error."
dballer said:No.. You can believe what you want. I do not wish to he a HATER in any mean. I do not agree with it. I am not going to be mean to anyone for what they do behind closed doors. But do not try to force feed me that crap either. As long as I am not forced to deal with the way gay people have sex.. it is all good in the hood with me. Not everyone follows my religion. That does not mean I hate them. It just means don't come knockin on Sunday.

musclebrains said:
Does this mean you are not going to be a judge in the Forest Park Pentecostal Ru Paul Look Alike Contest after all?![]()
dballer said:Lev 18:22-23 "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."
Lev 20:13 "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death."
1 Cor 6:9 "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals"
1 Tim 1:9-10 "realizing the fact that (civil) law is not made for a righteous man, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers"
Rom 1:26-27 "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error."
SmegmaSoldier said:i dont like when people are classified as homophobes just because they hate gays. im not afraid of them i just hate them.
who cares what they think about me? its not like any of them could do anything about it!!
dballer said:"God’s Word offers the opportunity for redemption, forgiveness, and grace along with the pronouncement of judgement. God’s agenda is clear: to seek out sinners, and offer them the free gift of salvation by grace, through faith in Jesus Christ.
Does God hate homosexuality? Yes, He absolutely does.
Does God hate people who practice homosexuality? NO, HE ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT.
God loves homosexuals, and invites them to come to Him, to allow Him to wash, sanctify, and justify them, and to let Him heal them of the deep wounds in their hearts that cause them to be pulled toward homosexuality.
If you are a homosexual, let me make this clear: There are many in your ranks that want you to believe that "God made you that way." That is really a sophisticated form of denial -- with the hope that, if you say it enough, it will overpower your inner sense that the lifestyle is unnatural and wrong. If, for just one moment, you will take the bold step away from that denial, and listen to your heart, you’ll realize that "God made you that way" is a lie. "
SmegmaSoldier said:
hahahahaa gays beating my ass!!! i would crush them like little bugs!!!!
its not silly to make it a semantic issue. the word homophobia leads people to believe that the person is afraid of gays. thats bullshit. i just dont like them.
The Nature Boy said:my problem is not with people who love god and love the bible, it's when they use it as a basis to say that "homosexuality is wrong because it says so in the bible."
Then when you go into detail, you find out that christ didn't say those words, it was other people who supposedly talked to God. How the heck do we know that they really talked to God? People through out history have been burned alive for saying they've talked to God. Joan of Ark, talked to God, but nobody beleived her. David Koresh, he said he talked to God. And everyone thought he was crazy, and he got burned alive.
It's okay for people in the early days to have been getting messages from God, but now in the present day it's just crazy talk. Say some gay preacher said he recieved Gods word that said God loves everyone including gays. Boy would he never hear the end of it.
SmegmaSoldier said:
hahahahaa gays beating my ass!!! i would crush them like little bugs!!!!
its not silly to make it a semantic issue. the word homophobia leads people to believe that the person is afraid of gays. thats bullshit. i just dont like them.
flexed1 said:Those of you who know me know I am gay. That said I guess I would be called a homophobe. Reason is simple any gays whom walk around like girls, act like girls, and who walk around and let others think thta all gays are like this I stay clear away from and even make fun of.
I am 100% man the only difference is i prefer to sleep with a man. My other half like me avoids parades ( why do we need a fucking parade) flags, and flaunting. People respect me for being a person and when they get to know me for being a cool gay guy they can joke with.
Yes, I am a homephobe as I don't want what others see on television to represent me. Its maybe about time thta folks like me who have normal relationships and beleive in equal rights for everyone and who offer a different view of gays steps foward so that most folks don't think gays just wear dresses and spread aids. I am monagamus and happy being so and I also voted proudly for Bush.
flexed1 said:Those of you who know me know I am gay. That said I guess I would be called a homophobe. Reason is simple any gays whom walk around like girls, act like girls, and who walk around and let others think thta all gays are like this I stay clear away from and even make fun of.
I am 100% man the only difference is i prefer to sleep with a man. My other half like me avoids parades ( why do we need a fucking parade) flags, and flaunting. People respect me for being a person and when they get to know me for being a cool gay guy they can joke with.
Yes, I am a homephobe as I don't want what others see on television to represent me. Its maybe about time thta folks like me who have normal relationships and beleive in equal rights for everyone and who offer a different view of gays steps foward so that most folks don't think gays just wear dresses and spread aids. I am monagamus and happy being so and I also voted proudly for Bush.
flexed1 said:no sorry I am 40 and have been around. Its folks inwearing female clothes, dressed as nuns, dykes on bikes and yes even muscle guys but none the less you want respect and this is what main stream tv shows. No I have never been bashed but than again I am a person and act like a person. You have to admit some gays like to push being gay down folks throats. Stone wall was a few guys trying to get rights. Know what I don't need any special rights and don't beleive and individual need them either. Thats my beleif. If your white, black, asian or whatever you are a person and deserve to be treated like one. i stay far away from people who misrepresent who I am in the everyday life. thats just my opinion and like you I am gay just see things different which is fine as well.
flexed1 said:no sorry I am 40 and have been around. Its folks inwearing female clothes, dressed as nuns, dykes on bikes and yes even muscle guys but none the less you want respect and this is what main stream tv shows. No I have never been bashed but than again I am a person and act like a person. You have to admit some gays like to push being gay down folks throats. Stone wall was a few guys trying to get rights. Know what I don't need any special rights and don't beleive and individual need them either. Thats my beleif. If your white, black, asian or whatever you are a person and deserve to be treated like one. i stay far away from people who misrepresent who I am in the everyday life. thats just my opinion and like you I am gay just see things different which is fine as well.
musclebrains said:
GAy people should be able to be everything they are -- from the pedestrian to the outrageous -- without someone telling them they have an obligation to represent the entire population of gay people.
flexed1 said:Those of you who know me know I am gay. That said I guess I would be called a homophobe. Reason is simple any gays whom walk around like girls, act like girls, and who walk around and let others think thta all gays are like this I stay clear away from and even make fun of.
I am 100% man the only difference is i prefer to sleep with a man. My other half like me avoids parades ( why do we need a fucking parade) flags, and flaunting. People respect me for being a person and when they get to know me for being a cool gay guy they can joke with.
Yes, I am a homephobe as I don't want what others see on television to represent me. Its maybe about time thta folks like me who have normal relationships and beleive in equal rights for everyone and who offer a different view of gays steps foward so that most folks don't think gays just wear dresses and spread aids. I am monagamus and happy being so and I also voted proudly for Bush.
impressiveflexed1 said:Those of you who know me know I am gay. That said I guess I would be called a homophobe. Reason is simple any gays whom walk around like girls, act like girls, and who walk around and let others think thta all gays are like this I stay clear away from and even make fun of.
I am 100% man the only difference is i prefer to sleep with a man. My other half like me avoids parades ( why do we need a fucking parade) flags, and flaunting. People respect me for being a person and when they get to know me for being a cool gay guy they can joke with.
Yes, I am a homephobe as I don't want what others see on television to represent me. Its maybe about time thta folks like me who have normal relationships and beleive in equal rights for everyone and who offer a different view of gays steps foward so that most folks don't think gays just wear dresses and spread aids. I am monagamus and happy being so and I also voted proudly for Bush.
SmegmaSoldier said:
1. i dont care if its you and 100 of your mary friends, you couldnt take my grandma.
2. bullshit. i looked up phobia and this is what i got: A persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous. A strong fear, dislike, or aversion.
while the definition included "dislike" and "aversion" the word phobia still generates the idea of fear to most people. people who hate gays shouldnt be called homophobes.
flexed1 said:muscle you appear to be very one sided on the issue at hand. Why is it that you feel that its okay for gays to be out and be who they want to be so that everyone on earth thinks this is how we act?
Sorry if I went into a hospital which I have many times I get the same service any other person should get. However if I went into a hospital in drag or as a nun it would cause attention to myself and thanks exactly why I have no problems nor do people have problems with me. I do not cause attention to myself and am very secure with who I am and beleive it or not its people like me who make others think that not all gays are as you describe expressing themsleves.
YES, people are free to express themselves but at the same time you are trying to get others to not be homophobe and this is the exact reason they are. I guess we are two different breeds and that trust me is fine as everyone is different. And by the way 90% of my friends are straight.
dballer said:
What about the NAMBLA members?????
musclebrains said:
What about them? They have a right to organize. They certainly don't have a right to break the pedophilia laws.
SmegmaSoldier said:
1. i dont care if its you and 100 of your mary friends, you couldnt take my grandma.
2. bullshit. i looked up phobia and this is what i got: A persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous. A strong fear, dislike, or aversion.
while the definition included "dislike" and "aversion" the word phobia still generates the idea of fear to most people. people who hate gays shouldnt be called homophobes.
dballer said:
I guess you are right. Bin Laden has the right to organize too.
musclebrains said:
LOL. It's called the right of free speech and assembly, Dballer. We extend that right to all kinds of disgusting creatures, including racists like David Duke.
musclebrains said:Yes, I'm serious. It's general usage has come to mean people who have an aversion to homosexuality. Phobic reactions are aversions based on fear, so I'm not disagreeing that the word technically has that meaning.
I suggest you write the Board of Political Correctness and submit "homohatred" as a more accurate substitute.
dballer said:
the diffrence is.. protesters of David Duke are heroes.. protesters of NAMBLA are close minded ideologists.
dballer said:
how about Hetrosexiest.
SmegmaSoldier said:
its general usage is fear of homos. people use it to try to bring a negative spin on the "homophobes" and make it appear as if they have some kind of irrational fear. people with brains do not feel that people that hate gays are homophobes because that word is simply a gay-lover's term used for their purposes. homo haters are not homophobes by any rational explanation of the word.
SmegmaSoldier said:
thats fine with me. the word "homophobe" is what fags want to use because it degrades people that hate homos. we are people too!!! cant we all just not get along!??
SmegmaSoldier said:
haha look at the lips and nose of the one on the right!! hes gotta have some black in him!!! anyway, i dont think its fair to group gays in as if they are like an ethnic group. i think they will be able to severely cut down the number of gays soon with genetic engineering.
SmegmaSoldier said:
i think you could still make the choice not to have sex with guys. however you were born with some genetic defect that made you more feminine in some ways than other guys. that is why you like penis. it can be fixed.
Darktooth said:
Maybe so... you sound really adamant of getting rid of gays or something... do you really hate gays THAT much? I mean, does it really affect your life that someone is gay? sheesh, gimme a break...
HansNZ said:How would I know what their sexual orientation is?
ttlpkg said:
This is the root of the problem in my opinion. If you don't advertise your sexual habits, how can you be discriminated against? That is why I see no need for SPECIAL homosexual rights legislation, other than the already exisiting more general civil rights laws.
musclebrains said:
LOL...do you "advertise" your sexual habits when you apply for a marriage license, hold hands in a movie theatre, or bring your wife to a company picnic? I think you do. You know, TTl, if you acted more white, you'd probably be able to operate more competently outside the unnaturally unprejudiced military too.
It's been said about a billion times to you, but you just don't seem to get it: it is LEGAL to discriminate against gay people in many places in this country. Housing laws do NOT apply to gay people. Employment laws do NOT apply to gay people.
ttlpkg said:
It early where I am, have you had a few cups of coffee already? Jeez! My point is how would someone know you were gay, bi or into bestiality in the first place? Most businesses, vendors, builders couldn't care less, just want to make a buck. Housing and Employment laws apply to all people, including gays. You're just not happy because there is no law that applies to gays exclusively and specifically.
Act more compentently outside the military? Hmmmm. Do you think I live like Gomer Pyle in a barracks 24 hrs a day? I live in the same world you do my man.
dballer said:
This is the kind of Gay logic that I would stand up for.
Speaking of the recent gay parade in Atlanta. I was sitting at Willies eating a burrito the day before the parade or party and I overheard two guys (about my age 28) talking about how exciting it would be.. the one guy told the other that there would be nude boys there.. he went on to say that the boys he was talking about were between 12 and 14!!! Needless to say I showed my distaste.. I almost threw up. I was actually weighing the options of a assault charge.
flexed1 said:Those of you who know me know I am gay. That said I guess I would be called a homophobe. Reason is simple any gays whom walk around like girls, act like girls, and who walk around and let others think thta all gays are like this I stay clear away from and even make fun of.
Advaik said:
I dont hate you because you are gay, I hate you because you voted for bush!
Actually I agree. I hate gays who flaunt it around acting all proud of it. I hate anyone that does that about anything. Blacks, Gays, Jews, Cristians, even Racist like the KKK. I say fuck all of them, we are all people, why do you need to flaunt your special little differences to everyone? I just lose so much respect for someone who does that.
SmegmaSoldier said:
this guy has been begging me to lick his balls ever since i registered here!!! get over it man!! im not gonna lick your "tender love-nuggets" (as he calls them in his sexually explicit pm's).
flexed1 said:muscle point taken but just so you know I to find folsom street and what was shown there offensive only because thats all that is shown in public and thats the point I am making. Don't think for a second they will ever show folks like me as that would not be good for ratings and thats is exactly what I and straight folks are afraid of. Everyone should be who they are but don't expects gays when all they see is the circuis, sex parties, and everything else like that. I am proud to be gay just keep it to myself.
dballer said:
the diffrence is.. protesters of David Duke are heroes.. protesters of NAMBLA are close minded ideologists.
SmegmaSoldier said:
its general usage is fear of homos. people use it to try to bring a negative spin on the "homophobes" and make it appear as if they have some kind of irrational fear. people with brains do not feel that people that hate gays are homophobes because that word is simply a gay-lover's term used for their purposes. homo haters are not homophobes by any rational explanation of the word.
SmegmaSoldier said:
you are doubting that it can be fixed? maybe not in the ones currently alive but in the future genetic engineering will be able to fix it. whoever is able to do it will earn whatever money he makes from it. i know i would pay for that service.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










