mrplunkey
New member
I started to address that argument in my first post, but figured no one would be reading it anyway.
You called it "the bigger issue", but I call it the paper thin excuse.
"Well he's going to blow that money anyway, and hey he'll enjoy playing the lottery, so we the government of the great state of [ ] will give him something we'd like him to blow it on"
The fact that unwise poor people tend to blow money they cannot afford is completely irrelevant to the fact that state governments are consciously exploiting their citizenry by encouraging that behavior for their own benefit.
Lotteries are the Poor & Stupid Tax.
Lotteries are a tax on the willing.
Arguing that the states shouldn't be in the lottery business is sound, but it's really a states' rights issue. I personally think my state has no business running a lottery. They should pave my roads and keep a few cops around -- that's all I'm interested in.
As far as the paper-thin issue goes, even suggesting anyone knows what "blowing money" means is morally presumptuous. I think anyone buying licorice or celery is wasting their money, since I hate it. Javaguru probably believes giving money to a televangelist is blowing money. Musclemom probably believes buying a bag of ruffles potato chips is blowing money.
But don't get me wrong... if someone does get to make all these value decisions, I'll jump right on the bandwagon as long as I'm the one who gets to call the shots for everyone. But then of course, I'm sure there are a few hundred million Americans who feel the same way too.