Higher Physiological Total Test Count

[XMAN.]

What do u think the Higher Physiological Total Test Count should be?
plz post ur stats and ur hrt dose and ur current test count.

my stats : 31 yo 6 feet 200 lbs arround 10-13% BF
on 200mg test e/week , which puts me between 1100-1200 ng/dl
and in my opinion the 1200 ng/dl is the max high normal range.

 

[XMAN.]

come on guys no one has an opinion on this, just what do u think the highest and safest test level u want to have all year long.

 

[caribeman]

1200

 

[XMAN.]

for ppl who don't want to post their stats just vote on the poll

 

[ArmaniAK47]

Voted 1500+

Mine is about 900ng/dl 16 days after a 400mg test cyp shot..

So about 400mgs a week.. or more.. forever. For me anyways..

I also plan on adding other products to my permanent HRT.

 

[XMAN.]

Voted 1500+

Mine is about 900ng/dl 16 days after a 400mg test cyp shot..

So about 400mgs a week.. or more.. forever. For me anyways..

I also plan on adding other products to my permanent HRT.

do u think it's safe to cruise that high all year long for years, is there any study that shows it is possible let's say 2000 ng/dl all the time (of course with estro and prolac control) without any long term permanent sides like heart enlargement , cancer or diabetes?

 

[Zyglamail]

do u think it's safe to cruise that high all year long for years, is there any study that shows it is possible let's say 2000 ng/dl all the time (of course with estro and prolac control) without any long term permanent sides like heart enlargement , cancer or diabetes?

Unfortunately since the government criminalized AAS use many Docs simply avoid it and little real long term research has been done. There is however tons of empirical evidence that it appears to be as safe as any lifestyle choice.

You are far more likely to get diabetis or cancer from unhealthy diet in my opinion than from AAS use.

 

[XMAN.]

Unfortunately since the government criminalized AAS use many Docs simply avoid it and little real long term research has been done. There is however tons of empirical evidence that it appears to be as safe as any lifestyle choice.

You are far more likely to get diabetis or cancer from unhealthy diet in my opinion than from AAS use.

so what is ur number Zyg? what did u vote for?

 

[thelion2005]

Each of us has different goals, be they performance or appearance. We have it in our minds that is takes a high level of test to achieve great strength and/or a dynamic appearance.

However, it the combo of diet, exercise, recovery and additional aas that produces results.

I would opt for a lower test reading (be it at the top of the range) if strength and appearance goals were met. Sides are damaging.

 

[XMAN.]

Each of us has different goals, be they performance or appearance. We have it in our minds that is takes a high level of test to achieve great strength and/or a dynamic appearance.

However, it the combo of diet, exercise, recovery and additional aas that produces results.

I would opt for a lower test reading (be it at the top of the range) if strength and appearance goals were met. Sides are damaging.

exactly , but what is the top of the range? cuz different labs have different ranges , i know that in the past the top conventional range was 800ng/dl , but nowadays we see numbers like 1000 - 1200 or 1300ng/dl as a normal physiological level.