Debate on oral- vs IM-steroids

[stevesmi]

I meant in terms of suppression

gotta say this in your original post man.. when you come on here and say safest i automatically think of the lipids and the organ health.

its all relative to how long you run your AAS. even primo run for a long period of time is gonna suppress. all AAS suppress in the end. thats why you run the right ancillaries and have a gold PCT ready.

but in terms of suppression running test at 500mg a week like most guys do is extremely suppressive and don't let anyone fool you into thinking its not.. hell there is a guy on here who just started a test only cycle for the first time who has a thread up and his LH and FSH are at 0 already and he is ONLY on week 3!!

 

[Cali72]

Hi guys!
Okay, I've been reading alot, but can't seem to figure this one out..
If you wanna run a cycle, and ALL you take in consideration is how safe the cycle would be.
1. What steroid would you run?
2. At what dose? (Of course, a realistic dose.)
I'm kind of stuck between primo only, test only or anavar only. It would be fun to see you guys opinion on this.

And yeah, this is just hypotetical, I'm in the starting phase of learning about steroids (also studying medicine, so really do think that the subject is interesting!).

Primo only will be my choice.
Primo has the least suppression at low to moderate doses.
It is very close to being an ideal steroid if there is such a thing.
Oh and 300mg/week will do the trick if its legit pharma grade of course.

 

[rich_89]

None are 'safe' in the sense i think you are suggesting OP. All have pros and cons. You just have to have the knowledge and the brains to cycle correctly and deal with those sides.

 

[easynote]

Really interesting to see your thoughts on this, and it seems like there's some confusion on which is actually the best (best in this situation meaning safest). I see someone may think I just meant when it comes to supression, but I meant when considering everything, except results. So liver, kidneys,lipids,supression.. you name it. And this is not a thread where I want advise on what to run. I have no intention of doing steroids yet (I'm 20), and if I where to do so I would def do a test only cycle. I just want to learn.
I also see that a guy in here said "I meant in terms of supression". Well, I (OP) did certainly not mean just in terms of supression.

One more question: Many people seem to be under the impression that oral only is bad news for your body when it comes to sides. Why is an oral only worse than an oral with test added? If you don't think about libido, of course.

 

[Headholio]

Why is an oral only worse than an oral with test added? If you don't think about libido, of course.

I don't think that's true, and I don't think anyone said that. Adding test to an oral certainly wouldn't make it safer, unless maybe the test would allow a lower dose of the oral.

 

[easynote]

I don't that's true, and I don't think anyone said that. Adding test to an oral certainly wouldn't make it safer, unless maybe the test would allow a lower dose of the oral.

Hehe, I didn't mean people in this discussion, but every guy juicing where I live seems to mean this. (Btw, there's alot of guys who's only 15-17 around here who's on.. Sick trend.)

 

[Headholio]

Hehe, I didn't mean people in this discussion, but every guy juicing where I live seems to mean this. (Btw, there's alot of guys who's only 15-17 around here who's on.. Sick trend.)

That is a sick trend, and part of the problem is the ease of getting the legal roids on the internet. I know it sucks that all these favorite roids like beastrol get banned, but the problem is that kids are buying the stuff. My son is a teenager and there are lots of kids from the football team buying that exact type of stuff. So I know banning takes away peoples freedom of choice, but it also helps curb this growing problem.