I'm considering the Chucks/Converse shoes because I like the fact that they're flat. But, they probably don't have any arch support, do they? I have flat feet and could use a shoe with some arch support, for squats and other leg work.
I'm considering the Chucks/Converse shoes because I like the fact that they're flat. But, they probably don't have any arch support, do they? I have flat feet and could use a shoe with some arch support, for squats and other leg work.
Arch support is over rated. If you're only training legs in them it won't make much of a difference imo.
If you've been training legs in cross trainers or any other "air soled" shoes you will notice a big difference when squatting in chucks. In fact, I would be willing to bet your numbers go up from it.
Arch support is over rated. If you're only training legs in them it won't make much of a difference imo.
If you've been training legs in cross trainers or any other "air soled" shoes you will notice a big difference when squatting in chucks. In fact, I would be willing to bet your numbers go up from it.
Agreed. That super strong sidewall makes a noticeable difference. I think w/o them we must be expending energy on stabilizing ourselves that with Chucks getting funneled into vertical movement.
look at all the bare foot haters here lol. wheres bfold. i love squatting barefoot. i am very stable this way. im also not a pler but my numbers arent to bad and ive never been injured.
look at all the bare foot haters here lol. wheres bfold. i love squatting barefoot. i am very stable this way. im also not a pler but my numbers arent to bad and ive never been injured.
I used to squat in aquatic shoes held well to the floor. However the big issue will happen later. Your arches will begin to fall and give you feet problems. I know it will never happen to you. Don't kid yourself. Have you noticed that your shoe size is one or 2 sizes bigger than it was when you were in your twenty's.