Before and After Humans.

[StickFigure]

The planet is only 6000 years old?
I'm not even gonna touch this one. OMG.
People should finish atleast the 6th grade before posting.
Fossil record-Check it out.

Go back a page and read my post on carbon dating.

post #37

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

Go back a page and read my post on carbon dating.

post #37

Do a little research on how "carbon dating" works. Once you figure that out, you will probably laugh at how ridiculous carbon dating is!

One experiment I vaguely remember, sorry I don't have specifics, went something like this:

Scientists were given an object to carbon date. The scientists were told it was found on an archeological dig. When actually the object was only a few years old and had been burried in the ground during that time.
The scientists "carbon dated" the object as being hundreds of thousands of years old.

Carbon dating is really a joke.

I know how carbon isotope ratio dating works....
There is room for error.
Still has nothing to do with the retarted response of the planet being 6000 years old.

 

[artrius]

interesting theory on how humans may turn out. I can see that sort of thing happening, but I think the timeline is way off. I personally think it will occur MUCH MUCH MUCH faster than that, perhaps cybernetic humans within a 1000 years or even less. They'll probably come up with a way to make the body not reject technology other than by taking a pill or something.

 

[Eringobraugh]

NO ONE WILL EVER SEE EVOLUTION.....BECAUSE IT IS A FARCE!!

Show me proof! Show me the missing links! And I'm not just talking about humans. Show me ONE single fossil that shows a creature in it's "evolutionary transition stage" where it is transforming from it's original state to it's "evolved" state.
Ain't gonna happen.

We see evolution taking place with bacteria and viruses, superstrains and superbacteria and antiresistantance to antibiotics. It is function of reproduction rates and mutations and follows the rules of evolution. Carbon dating, based on chemical laws disprove the claim of 6000years of existance. I on the other hand dont believe anything that I havent experienced so to me its all wrong, just a creation of the mind that is where your logic leads.

 

[StickFigure]

I know how carbon isotope ratio dating works....
There is room for error.
Still has nothing to do with the retarted response of the planet being 6000 years old.

Once again, go back a page.

See my post #29. Go to the link, if you really want to know the truth, and read what he has to say or better yet, get the video series. The proof is all there!

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

Once again, go back a page.

See my post #29. Go to the link, if you really want to know the truth, and read what he has to say or better yet, get the video series. The proof is all there!

The proof LOL.
You know how fast mountains would have to grow, then erode for that time line to work?
Here's this: The Himalayas grow at centimeter every two years. They are now over 30,000 feet.

 

[StickFigure]

The proof LOL.
You know how fast mountains would have to grow, then erode for that time line to work?
Here's this: The Himalayas grow at centimeter every two years. They are now over 30,000 feet.

Well if you don't believe in God and creation, it'll be hard for you to digest.
You must take into account the fact that God made the mountains. The great flood (Noah's Ark) created many of the valleys and canyons in a very short time. Any growth of the mountains or erosion of valleys and canyons that now occur is simply the natural process. That's why all these dating methods are a joke, because their foundation is based on how things work in the present day.

Seriously, if you really want to know the facts, you need to get a hold of his video series. If you're worried about the price, you can order them watch them copy them and return them for your money back. He has no problem with that. He just wants to get the truth into peoples hands.

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

Any growth of the mountains or erosion of valleys and canyons that now occur is simply the natural process.

Why now is it a natural process? Maybe it always was.

That's why all these dating methods are a joke, because their foundation is based on how things work in the present day.

Not a joke - radiometric dating methods are law.
Taking limits of isotopes of lead works much more clearly then carbon.

Seriously, if you really want to know the facts, you need to get a hold of his video series. If you're worried about the price, you can order them watch them copy them and return them for your money back. He has no problem with that. He just wants to get the truth into peoples hands.

Those aren't fact...
Whatever valid argument is brought up, your gonna say God did it, or changed it, or some shit, and since your argument includes an all powerful being, and I/we weren't here to see it happen for ourself, this will go nowhere.
I can show mathmatica laws, you can say God made it different cause he has magic powers to do all.
Kinda like two kids arguing about if Santa can fly or not. I say no, he's a fairy tail, you'll say, no he is real, and since we haven't seen him, and there is no evidence to prove or disprove; it's an impass.

 

[Scotsman]

Show me proof it does not exist. SHOW ME PROOF!

There is NO EVOLUTIONARY TRANSITION STAGE. It is GRADUAL! It's not scientist's fault humans do not live millions of years so you can see the evolutinary process. Talk to God about that.

Why do I have organs I do not need?

I will stick with the science I see EVERYDAY. Thanks

Debating with these people is like teaching a pig to sing all you do is waste your time and annoy the pig. You can't argue with people who rely on blind faith to guide them instead of trying to see other points of view. As a Geologist/paleontologist I can't agree with you more from all the evidence I have seen/studied.

Cheers,
Scotsman

 

[StickFigure]

Why now is it a natural process? Maybe it always was.

Not a joke - radiometric dating methods are law.
Taking limits of isotopes of lead works much more clearly then carbon.

Those aren't fact...
Whatever valid argument is brought up, your gonna say God did it, or changed it, or some shit, and since your argument includes an all powerful being, and I/we weren't here to see it happen for ourself, this will go nowhere.
I can show mathmatica laws, you can say God made it different cause he has magic powers to do all.
Kinda like two kids arguing about if Santa can fly or not. I say no, he's a fairy tail, you'll say, no he is real, and since we haven't seen him, and there is no evidence to prove or disprove; it's an impass.

Yes, impass is where we end up. But I think if you took time and watched that video series, you might see things differently. He is the expert, not me. He can explain it better than my pathetic ramblings.
That is unless you're afraid of finding out the truth?