Another Reason to Ban Conservative Judges

[2Thick]

Re: Re: Another Reason to Ban Conservative Judges

there you go again wanting to ban someone. nazi mod!

I will ban you for putting a woman in your avatar.

 

[spongebob]

Re: Re: Re: Another Reason to Ban Conservative Judges

I will ban you for putting a woman in your avatar.

shit i just realized i do kind of have feminine pose there. time to get a new one.

 

[2Thick]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Another Reason to Ban Conservative Judges

shit i just realized i do kind of have feminine pose there. time to get a new one.

 

[bwood]

Like the joke the guy made about a bomb being in his camera?

I do not see this judge being hauled off to civil court for libel.

A. Absolute privileges: An "absolute" privilege applies even if D was motivated solely by malice or other bad motives. The following classes of absolute privilege are usually recognized:
1. Judicial proceedings: Judges, lawyers, parties and witnesses are all absolutely privileged in what they say during the course of judicial proceedings, regardless of the motives for their statements. (Example: D, in a pleading in a civil lawsuit between him and P, calls P a crook. P cannot recover from D for defamation, even if P shows that D knew D’s statement was a lie.)

 

[2Thick]

A. Absolute privileges: An "absolute" privilege applies even if D was motivated solely by malice or other bad motives. The following classes of absolute privilege are usually recognized:
1. Judicial proceedings: Judges, lawyers, parties and witnesses are all absolutely privileged in what they say during the course of judicial proceedings, regardless of the motives for their statements. (Example: D, in a pleading in a civil lawsuit between him and P, calls P a crook. P cannot recover from D for defamation, even if P shows that D knew D’s statement was a lie.)

So a judge can say whatever he or she feels no matter how much of a lie it is?

 

[bwood]

So a judge can say whatever he or she feels no matter how much of a lie it is?

for defamation purposes, yes...

for other torts, like intentional infliction of emotion cruelty,
or assault i dont believe so...

but i am too damn lazy to look...

 

[rsnoble]

in response to threads subject: becaue their republican!

 

[p0ink]

in response to threads subject: becaue their republican!

yesm let's have more liberal judges like the ones on the 9th circuit, who declared citizens do not have the rights to own guns.

sounds like a great plan.

 

[2Thick]

yesm let's have more liberal judges like the ones on the 9th circuit, who declared citizens do not have the rights to own guns.

sounds like a great plan.

Stick to the topic, baby girl.

 

[atlantabiolab]

I'm sorry. I fail to see the link to conservatism in the action of the judge.