S samoth New member Sep 19, 2005 #1 We were wrong all along, it's penes. http://www.os3.nl/~leeuwen/pdf/pluralpenis.pdf
eat big New member Sep 19, 2005 #2 samoth said: We were wrong all along, it's penes. http://www.os3.nl/~leeuwen/pdf/pluralpenis.pdf Click to expand... That's a pasta too.
samoth said: We were wrong all along, it's penes. http://www.os3.nl/~leeuwen/pdf/pluralpenis.pdf Click to expand... That's a pasta too.
S samoth New member Sep 19, 2005 #4 eat big said: That's a pasta too. Click to expand... Hey now, this is a serious thread about something rather important.
eat big said: That's a pasta too. Click to expand... Hey now, this is a serious thread about something rather important.
jnevin New member Sep 19, 2005 #6 samoth said: Hey now, this is a serious thread about something rather impotent. Click to expand... AG rob.
samoth said: Hey now, this is a serious thread about something rather impotent. Click to expand... AG rob.
blut wump New member Sep 19, 2005 #8 What's the difference between a testicle and a prostate? There's a vas deferens between them.
redguru New member Sep 19, 2005 #9 samoth said: Some p are q. r is a q. Therefore, r is a p. Discuss. Click to expand... The logic of that proof is flawed. No mention of whether all r's are q's or whether q is a finite set including only p's and r's. In that proof "r is not a p" is an equally valid assumption.
samoth said: Some p are q. r is a q. Therefore, r is a p. Discuss. Click to expand... The logic of that proof is flawed. No mention of whether all r's are q's or whether q is a finite set including only p's and r's. In that proof "r is not a p" is an equally valid assumption.