Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Accurate or not?

tony nico

New member
ImageUploadedByEliteFitness.com - Anabolic Steroids, Bodybuilding1466023187.581832.webp ImageUploadedByEliteFitness.com - Anabolic Steroids, Bodybuilding1466023199.852256.webp
 
its a very outdated chart, they don't even list aromasin as it was developed after that chart was made

their cost analysis is not accurate anymore as we now have UGL's everywhere and they over rate oral use.. example is anadrol is a 10 in strength and mass. yet tren is lower? yeah okay. obviously the person who came up with that chart never used tren as nothing is better for strength and mass

then they put anadrol sides at a 9, and DNP at 10. I'm sorry but their sides aren't even in the same league. it seems like if a steroid aromatizes or has androgenic tendencies they will overrate its sides.. and if a steroid is more anabolic they underrate its sides.. example is winny sides is low on that chart, yet winny will fry your hair and cause joint problems, and crippling pumps.. winny sides are nasty depending on how you look at it, but in my view having dry joints and losing globs of hair is 2 of the worst sides a guy can get!

I could blow so many holes in that chart, it is way too vague
 
Charts like this are good 'ball park' measurements but you have to remember that each person responds differently to each compound. It is very individual.

I am a big advocate on having all my clients run blood work with their cycles. I have had 2 clients use the exact same amount of dbol from the same UG lab in their cycles. Person a's liver enzymes barely went up. Person b's liver enzymes shot up like crazy.

You can use charts like this for general info but take it with a grain of salt. Your age, genetics, life style, body fat percentage etc etc all play a role.
 
While these charts are quite an interesting form of presenting different steroids with their properties, a lot of individual and unique properties of the compounds are ignored there. Therefore, I am not an advocate of such tables, since each compound has to be consdered individually with the consideration of all the effects that can be expected from them. All in all, this kind of tables are an oversimplification, which can be dangerous at times. The example mentioned by @stevesmi is very important. Someone can try anadrol and consider its side effects bearable. Then he takes this table, and sees that DNP has only one point more in the side effect department. However, in reality the difference is drastic, since DNP can literally lead to death.
 
Alright thanks guys

I love that you are researching.. your best bet if researching each of these compounds as much as you can. and then trying them yourself.. that is the only way you will ever figure it out.. the dude who made that chart as I said above, based his data on properties of the compounds, not on actual experience. as Lev said no way anadrol is a 9 in sides, yet DNP is a 10.. if you are going to put anadrol at 9 then DNP should be more like 90 cause it can put you into a coma if you slightly overdose it
 
I love that you are researching.. your best bet if researching each of these compounds as much as you can. and then trying them yourself.. that is the only way you will ever figure it out.. the dude who made that chart as I said above, based his data on properties of the compounds, not on actual experience. as Lev said no way anadrol is a 9 in sides, yet DNP is a 10.. if you are going to put anadrol at 9 then DNP should be more like 90 cause it can put you into a coma if you slightly overdose it

Yea cheers man glad I'm on this forum learning something new every day
 
I love that you are researching.. your best bet if researching each of these compounds as much as you can. and then trying them yourself.. that is the only way you will ever figure it out.. the dude who made that chart as I said above, based his data on properties of the compounds, not on actual experience. as Lev said no way anadrol is a 9 in sides, yet DNP is a 10.. if you are going to put anadrol at 9 then DNP should be more like 90 cause it can put you into a coma if you slightly overdose it

Also depends from person to person. Honestly, clen fucks me up so hard, like 10 times as much as DNP would.

All of this in the chart is barely relevant, because every person has different receptors, and reactions to the compounds
 
Also depends from person to person. Honestly, clen fucks me up so hard, like 10 times as much as DNP would.

All of this in the chart is barely relevant, because every person has different receptors, and reactions to the compounds

Yea I did think that everyone reacts different I guess
 
Top Bottom