Just when you think Sarah Palin cant get any stupider

[Mr. dB]

Telling banks how and to whom to make loans? Who is the largest mortgage backer in the US now? Who is setting pay caps for employees in the financial sector? Who is floating trial balloons regarding taxes to banks who are paying bonuses to "fat cats" (his words, not mine)?

And you don't think that house health care bill was a nationalization of health care? We have a president who is on video saying he wants a single payer system, even if he has to transition through a public option. Are you trying to argue that the house bill as passed wasn't a huge funnel to push everyone into public health care over time?

And what else is cap and trade other than nationalization of energy? Who sets the caps? Who defines the rules for carbon offset credits?

Exactly how much more evidence would you need?

At this point I'm convinced you're a complete troll, you can't be this irrational. This sounds like it came straight from a Glenn Beck rant.

 

[redsamurai]

First, why would you ever let me know that gets under your skin? ...

Irrelevant since you're like a ringworm, everything you say/do is "under my skin"...

 

[mrplunkey]

At this point I'm convinced you're a complete troll, you can't be this irrational. This sounds like it came straight from a Glenn Beck rant.

Then point-out one errant statement from that post.

 

[mrplunkey]

Irrelevant since you're like a ringworm, everything you say/do is "under my skin"...

And as I said before, we (hint: I'm speaking for you again, in case you missed it the first time around) all know how much I enjoy that.

 

[redsamurai]

Then point-out one errant statement from that post.

You like to lay out facts and than cleverly overlay your own analysis over the top. So the facts aren't errant, just your woeful analysis that is devoid of full contextual knowledge of the subject. And I know this not because I know more on this particular subject......I just know "YOU". If I thought you were someone who looked at things from multiple angles I would listen to what you have to say every now and then. But you don't so I don't.

 

[mrplunkey]

You like to lay out facts and than cleverly overlay your own analysis over the top. So the facts aren't errant, just your woeful analysis that is devoid of full contextual knowledge of the subject. And I know this not because I know more on this particular subject......I just know "YOU". If I thought you were someone who looked at things from multiple angles I would listen to what you have to say every now and then. But you don't so I don't.

Then it should be trivial to logically and succinctly dismantle my statements. Instead, we get rambling rants filled with name-calling, quotation marks, ellipses and bouncing smiley faces.

 

[redsamurai]

Then it should be trivial to logically and succinctly dismantle my statements. Instead, we get rambling rants filled with name-calling, quotation marks, ellipses and bouncing smiley faces.

If you consider having your anlytical skills questioned as woefully inept "name calling"....than you're alot softer than even I had any idea.

 

[mrplunkey]

If you consider having your anlytical skills questioned as woefully inept "name calling"....than you're alot softer than even I had any idea.

I'm still waiting to see a logical and succinct post that dismantles a single argument I've made.

 

[redsamurai]

I'm still waiting to see a logical and succinct post that dismantles a single argument I've made.

In this post or another one? You're going to have to be more specific. You must know excel pretty good right? What would recommend, the sort function or go all out with a pivot table? I mean we're talking about alot of data here. Wait, you don't think I'll have to use access for this do you? fuck this could take awhile.

 

[Mr. dB]

Then point-out one errant statement from that post.

The interpretation, or spin, is what makes your observations erroneous. There is no intention or attempt to nationalize any of the industries you've cited above.

What's wrong with limiting bonuses to execs of failing companies that accepted bail-out money? How is that a threat to freedom? No one said the bail out was no-strings-attached. It should be an offense to every taxpayer that these fat cats think that they still have a license to proceed with the good-old-boy business as usual after driving their financial empires into failure. I think recent events have proven that unregulated free market capitalism is unworkable. That doesn't make regulation the first step down the slippery slope to fascism as you imply.

No one has proposed nationalizing the health industry, i.e. making doctors and nurses US Gov't Employees and hospitals US Gov't property.

The points you've challenged us to refute are all red herrings.