It's true

[gjohnson5]

So gjohnson, are there any circumstances in your mind where you'd feel justified following someone?

Let's start with an extreme example: If someone dressed in full Klan gear was walking down your street in a very determined way (clearly not just on a stroll), would you feel any justification if you wanted to follow him?

You're trying to draw some parallels between this situation (I knew The statistics were not in favor of Travon to begin with [Was just hoping for a more realistic verdict])

First things first
1. I'm in the wrong part of town if I see people dressed in Klan outfits
2. The Klan would never show up in my part of town

You scenario would never happen in reality

If the moon just happens to be full and this did happen
following someone is not against the law , but stalking is.
Ultimately neighborhood watch is not intended for those guy to follow people. The ShomRim case in Baltimore speaks to that end. Atleast the Shomrim guy was found guilty of assault.
But this happened in a state where people can atleast make partially sensible decisions

 

[bigbassturd]

Give it up and have a 40oz bro it's over.

At least y'all still have (half of) the white house

 

[TableFun]

You're trying to draw some parallels between this situation (I knew The statistics were not in favor of Travon to begin with [Was just hoping for a more realistic verdict])

First things first
1. I'm in the wrong part of town if I see people dressed in Klan outfits
2. The Klan would never show up in my part of town

You scenario would never happen in reality

If the moon just happens to be full and this did happen
following someone is not against the law , but stalking is.
Ultimately neighborhood watch is not intended for those guy to follow people. The ShomRim case in Baltimore speaks to that end. Atleast the Shomrim guy was found guilty of assault.
But this happened in a state where people can atleast make partially sensible decisions

These ( ) go inside of these [ ]

 

[dabuffguy]

A more realistic verdict?

Based upon the fact that there was zero proof that Zimmerman should be found guilty means that the only realistic verdict is not guilty.


I feel bad for the Martins. They lost their son and they will feel no justice for that. The death sentence can't bring him back.

Nobody really won.


But, if Zimmerman was found guilty, the justice system would have failed miserably.

 

[gjohnson5]

These ( ) go inside of these [ ]

I can place them any way I choose

 

[dabuffguy]

I can place them any way I choose

Sure you can, but you did it wrong.

 

[miplank]

these ( ) go inside of these [ ]

lol!

 

[gjohnson5]

There's no right or wrong way
This is a flipping forum , not a programming class

 

[TableFun]

There's no right or wrong way
This is a flipping forum , not a programming class

Aight

 

[mrplunkey]

You're trying to draw some parallels between this situation (I knew The statistics were not in favor of Travon to begin with [Was just hoping for a more realistic verdict])

First things first
1. I'm in the wrong part of town if I see people dressed in Klan outfits
2. The Klan would never show up in my part of town

You scenario would never happen in reality

If the moon just happens to be full and this did happen
following someone is not against the law , but stalking is.
Ultimately neighborhood watch is not intended for those guy to follow people. The ShomRim case in Baltimore speaks to that end. Atleast the Shomrim guy was found guilty of assault.
But this happened in a state where people can atleast make partially sensible decisions

I wasn't asking the likelihood of a clan member showing up for a march across your neighborhood.

What I'm asking is that would you see yourself justified in following him? And what's the difference in "following" and "stalking"?