drgoodbody
New member
Lately I have read so many posts and have seen people reply to even the most basic concepts with a "screw you, prove it to me" attitude.
Look, I'm trained as a scientist, spent 10 years in college and grad school, have 2 masters and phd, and if there's one thing that I can do its shred someone's ass with a non-stop attack of "why" and "bullshit, prove it to me" arguments. And even when someone produces abstracts or papers I can say "fuck you, I've published in dozen's of peer reviewed journals and been a reviewer myself 100+ times, and I can assure you that some of the studies that are passed thru even after peer review are WRONG, poorly controlled, and caveat ladden" Look, you can't win an argument with me if I want to be a dick. And apparently that's the approach lately here on EF. Everybody wants to be a respected guru, so they attack everyone else's posts and then it quickly degenerates into "do your research, show me abstracts and papers, and prove it to me you motherfucker".
I'm sorry for the rant, but maybe I've just been too nice in the past... How about I just jump on every fucking thread from here on out and demand abstracts, proof, publications, double blind studies, clinical reviews, and your motherfucking credentials to back a shit thing you have to say? Sounds like a real dickish way to act in my book, yet I see it all the time over here.
If you can't say something productive, don't say anything IMHO.
DrG
Look, I'm trained as a scientist, spent 10 years in college and grad school, have 2 masters and phd, and if there's one thing that I can do its shred someone's ass with a non-stop attack of "why" and "bullshit, prove it to me" arguments. And even when someone produces abstracts or papers I can say "fuck you, I've published in dozen's of peer reviewed journals and been a reviewer myself 100+ times, and I can assure you that some of the studies that are passed thru even after peer review are WRONG, poorly controlled, and caveat ladden" Look, you can't win an argument with me if I want to be a dick. And apparently that's the approach lately here on EF. Everybody wants to be a respected guru, so they attack everyone else's posts and then it quickly degenerates into "do your research, show me abstracts and papers, and prove it to me you motherfucker".
I'm sorry for the rant, but maybe I've just been too nice in the past... How about I just jump on every fucking thread from here on out and demand abstracts, proof, publications, double blind studies, clinical reviews, and your motherfucking credentials to back a shit thing you have to say? Sounds like a real dickish way to act in my book, yet I see it all the time over here.
If you can't say something productive, don't say anything IMHO.
DrG