What's the most amount of money you've spent on a cycle?

[black sheep]

I order for others at the same time. By hooking them up with the gear at well below Gym Prices I get my cycle for Free.

Next one has

40ml of NPP
20ml of Tren
100 10mg D-Bol
100 25mg Winny
20ml Test Enath
20ml Test Prop
Nolva, Clomid, HCG, and Arimidex.

Only thing I paid for was Dostinex! $90 shipped!

 

[flyingjer]

i make my own so i spent about 300 bucks for 110cc's of prop 100mg/ml and 100cc's of tren, 100mg/ml this is with all material to make and all ancillaries except HCG...btw this is at least two cycles worthh so i guess you can divide that in half btw i am going to do var after i finish this stuff out....and its only going to cost me about 50 bucks for a 8 week 50mg a week cycle...making your own stuff is the way to go IMO

 

[Sir-Que]

Ive spent 5,000 on this current cycle

I wanna see a fuckin receipt ......

I just got enough NPP,Test and EQ to run at heavy doses for the next 4 or 5 months....not mention 700 iu's of GH. And i'm no where near $5,000. I wanna see what you got....

 

[DIVISION]

I wanna see a fuckin receipt ......

I just got enough NPP,Test and EQ to run at heavy doses for the next 4 or 5 months....not mention 700 iu's of GH. And i'm no where near $5,000. I wanna see what you got....

BabyQue.........if he shows you a receipt, you show me a slow-mo replay of that fumble a couple years ago vs. Oakland that wasn't a forward pass....

Until then.........you are silenced......




DIV

 

[Sir-Que]

BabyQue.........if he shows you a receipt, you show me a slow-mo replay of that fumble a couple years ago vs. Oakland that wasn't a forward pass....

Until then.........you are silenced......




DIV

We can play it all day in slow-mo or fast-mo the results will still be the same, Oak-land takes a loss.

But now you got Moss so get over it.....nobody to throw to him, but you got him.

SQ-

 

[DIVISION]

We can play it all day in slow-mo or fast-mo the results will still be the same, Oak-land takes a loss.

But now you got Moss so get over it.....nobody to throw to him, but you got him.

I'm not a Raider fan......just giving you Boston kids the usual shit.




DIV

 

[Sir-Que]

I'm not a Raider fan......just giving you Boston kids the usual shit.




DIV

I'm from STL, I hate the Rams......but the Pats, a true Championship team in every sense of the word.

SQ-

 

[DIVISION]

I'm from STL, I hate the Rams......but the Pats, a true Championship team in every sense of the word.

They're champions, no arguing that point.

I just don't think they're dominant like the older dynasties were.

The Rams were leading most of the first Superbowl and really gave it away actually in the end with bad playcalling by Martz.

The 2nd Superbowl they dominated.

This last one they were outplayed in the first half, and if the Eagles had any offensive life the Pats would be staring at a 21-0 deficit at halftime. The 2nd half of that game I think the Pats played well.....but I really don't seem them as being dominant in that game throughout. The eagles defense was better than the Patriots, just that the defense was tired from being out on the field for 75% of the game.

I think Montana's 49er's would crush these Patriots......I think Aikman's Cowboys would have run the Patriots off the field by halftime.




DIV

 

[Sir-Que]

I just don't think they're dominant like the older dynasties were. The Rams were leading most of the first Superbowl and really gave it away actually in the end with bad playcalling by Martz.

And they were getting man handled by the defense. The Rams back then and still today can't play a physical game, and that's why they lost.

This last one they were outplayed in the first half, and if the Eagles had any offensive life the Pats would be staring at a 21-0 deficit at halftime. The 2nd half of that game I think the Pats played well.....but I really don't seem them as being dominant in that game throughout. The eagles defense was better than the Patriots, just that the defense was tired from being out on the field for 75% of the game.

I think Montana's 49er's would crush these Patriots......I think Aikman's Cowboys would have run the Patriots off the field by halftime.

Well, we agree on something. The Pats played a horrible game. And as a matter of fact it was one of their lack luster games that they played. If they would have lost it would have been because of their first half play. The Eagles did beat themselves.

Now about them being dominant: Few remember that before they played the Eagles from the VERY WEAK NFC the Pats BLEW OUT the National Football Leagues 1# defense and the leagues 1# offense from the mighty AFC. They didn't just win they blew them out, period. And you would agree there is no way any team from the NFC would have had a chance against Payton, Ben or Tom in the Super Bowl.

IMO I think the 04' Pats would give any team present or past a beating. They just aren't cocky enough for some people. They have a quiet whiteboy for a QB, none of the guys on defense have been charged with any felonies, and the receiving core don't dance enough in the in zone...oh and the RB's....they just like to play the game.

You might not think they're dominant, but ask Payton or any head coach that has to face these guys next year what they think....cause the AFC will win th Super Bowl again.

SQ-

 

[Whiskey]

my most expensive was around 1200 total. But I didn't know shit and the money was poorly used. Never again. Never again.

Whiskey