Walk or Run?

[LargeNCharge]

I'm curious as to what everyone here thinks is better for cardio-walking at a fast pace or running. I talked to a local bodybuilder and he said he prefers walking because he seems not to lose any muscle when doing so. I realize I'm going to have to walk for probably an hour to get any benefit, but if it is better, I'm willing to do it. So, what do you all think?

 

[diamonddiceclay]

45 min of fast walking is as good as running for 25 min

 

[the People's Champ]

well, listen to your joints. if you can run, or jog do it.

 

[madhops22]

They are both the same

If you walked for 2 miles you would burn the same amount of calories if you ran for 2 miles. There is no difference BUT it takes a lot longer to walk 2 miles than it does to run it! That's the only difference.
Hope that helps. I run because I don't feel like walking for hours to get the same results...I just dont have the time.

Madhops

 

[MrMuscle]

i say power walking is the thing..but it depends on your size..if you are a BIG dude, then running might not be somehting to consider. because your joint would probably scream.

 

[Getdownonit]

Walking is supposed to be better as it doesn't elevate your heart beat to high and optimises the bodies metabolism for fat burning. The first 20 mins of cardio will have no effect on fat levels as the body will burn glycogen from the muscle before it attacks another source of energy. By working at a moderate intensity the body is better able to attack fat as a source of energy rather than muscle, therefore reducing the muscle loss during cardio.

 

[curling]

Walking is supposed to be better as it doesn't elevate your heart beat to high and optimises the bodies metabolism for fat burning. The first 20 mins of cardio will have no effect on fat levels as the body will burn glycogen from the muscle before it attacks another source of energy.

All man I have to do 30 minutes? I almost die at the end of 20. Hold on a second, what if I do heavy weight training before I do cardio then do I still have to do 30 minutes to burn fat?

 

[Getdownonit]

After weights the glycogen stores have been depleted so you could do 20 mins no probs.

The point is that the first 20 mins are basically a warm up in many respects. When doing cardio only you could do 10 mins on 5 different machines and that would be just as good as 50 mins on one (actually better as the variety would really help the body). As long as the heart beat is elevated for a sustained period ie doing weights then cardio, or 30-40 mins cardio, you will burn fat more efficiently with a moderate pace.

 

[curling]

Thanks dude, I couldn't imagine doing 30 minutes after doing my weight training first. I mean my heart rate on the rat mill is about 149. I want to get to six percent but I don't want to die doing it if you know what I mean.

 

[Getdownonit]

The ideal heart rate zone is 55-60% of your maximum heart rate. This is calculated by taking your age from 220.

so if you 20 years old your max heart rate is 200, therefore your target heart beat is between 110-120 bpm.

If you work much above that then you will start mobilising protein from muscles as an energy source rather that fat.