Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Training Theory by AnimalMass, AngelFace, And JohnSmith

spatts said:
6' 8" and 275 sounds skinny to me. I've never seen the guy though.

lol your crazy. the man has 19 inch arms maybe 19 1/2 and ripped abs. he would easily put anyones physique to shame on this board. when people see pounds and weight they make a judgment too fast on how big someone is and how their physique is.

to debaser-yes i dont doubt he used roids. he has that look i guess. kinda the square jawed forehead look to him like paul dillet
 
Yeah I hate what it does, Bill Phillips comes to mind also...does the change in skull shape happen after repeated use, high doses in general, or what?
 
nclifter6feet6 said:


lol your crazy. the man has 19 inch arms maybe 19 1/2 and ripped abs. he would easily put anyones physique to shame on this board. when people see pounds and weight they make a judgment too fast on how big someone is and how their physique is.

to debaser-yes i dont doubt he used roids. he has that look i guess. kinda the square jawed forehead look to him like paul dillet

19" arms at 6'8" aren't all that great, though. I've had them less than a foot shorter than him, and much lighter too. I wasn't ripped at that weight, but he needs at least 21.5" to even approach putting "anyones physique on this board to shame."

As it is, I would match arm size with him. If you scaled him down to a 5'6" guy, he might be lucky to have 16.5" arms--Frank Zane size!

As for his training "style" or knowledge, don't run with that false cause again...you seem to attribute all size to either training or drugs. Genetics are far more important than either, though I'd take a hard trainer with only decent genetics over some lazy-assed Paul Dillett type.
 
Like I said, "I've never seen the guy, though." :rolleyes:



...and it's GH that contributes the sides you're talking about, not steroids.
 
guldukat said:


19" arms at 6'8" aren't all that great, though. I've had them less than a foot shorter than him, and much lighter too. I wasn't ripped at that weight, but he needs at least 21.5" to even approach putting "anyones physique on this board to shame."

As it is, I would match arm size with him. If you scaled him down to a 5'6" guy, he might be lucky to have 16.5" arms--Frank Zane size!

As for his training "style" or knowledge, don't run with that false cause again...you seem to attribute all size to either training or drugs. Genetics are far more important than either, though I'd take a hard trainer with only decent genetics over some lazy-assed Paul Dillett type.

dude your silly

a man that is 6feet8 with 19 inch arms has an arm length well over a foot longer than a man 5feet8. think about it it in total mass the tall mans arm is way bigger than a 19 inch arm of someone who is 5feet8. sorry short guy. and the judges would agree. priest has about the same arm size as a ronnie coleman or gunther. but look how much more massive they look than lee priest. and hell gunther is just 6feet3 this guy at the gym is 6 feet 8 and would tower over gunther
 
also about the continuis tension thing.......

i used to do 1000 pushups everyday for about a month. my chest definitly grew. but i dont think i was taking in enough protien for all the pounding i was doing to my body. but the chest did grow
 
nclifter6feet6 said:
dude your silly

Yes, I know. But my post wasn't.

a man that is 6feet8 with 19 inch arms has an arm length well over a foot longer than a man 5feet8.

Indeed. His bones are also bigger, and his muscles are far longer. That's a plus for building actual size, but for perceived size, it is a hindrance for the tall man.

I think you're confusing the two. An 18" arm will look crazy-huge on a guy that's 4'11", and less than crazy huge on a 5'11" guy, but it's much, much easier for the 5'11" guy to build that measurement.

think about it it in total mass the tall mans arm is way bigger than a 19 inch arm of someone who is 5feet8. sorry short guy.

No. It's smaller because his bones have to be bigger. But even with similar bones, the mass of that measurement is the same, dude.

Again, you're confusing actual size with "perceived size."

and the judges would agree. priest has about the same arm size as a ronnie coleman or gunther. but look how much more massive they look than lee priest. and hell gunther is just 6feet3 this guy at the gym is 6 feet 8 and would tower over gunther

I hear you, but in fact Lee's arms are not anywhere near Ronnie's actual measurements. Charles Poliquin taped Lee at about 20.5". Ronnie is close to 22".

And remember, an arm measurement is simply a measurement of diameter. An arm is like a cylinder. You can plug in the dimensions and come up with an actual volume. If both arms are 19", the volume is the same. So if both are muscular arms, the mass (weight) is the same, too.

But yes, I am short :) LOL. Don't remind me, tall guy!
 
guldukat said:


Yes, I know. But my post wasn't.



Indeed. His bones are also bigger, and his muscles are far longer. That's a plus for building actual size, but for perceived size, it is a hindrance for the tall man.

I think you're confusing the two. An 18" arm will look crazy-huge on a guy that's 4'11", and less than crazy huge on a 5'11" guy, but it's much, much easier for the 5'11" guy to build that measurement.



No. It's smaller because his bones have to be bigger. But even with similar bones, the mass of that measurement is the same, dude.

Again, you're confusing actual size with "perceived size."



I hear you, but in fact Lee's arms are not anywhere near Ronnie's actual measurements. Charles Poliquin taped Lee at about 20.5". Ronnie is close to 22".

And remember, an arm measurement is simply a measurement of diameter. An arm is like a cylinder. You can plug in the dimensions and come up with an actual volume. If both arms are 19", the volume is the same. So if both are muscular arms, the mass (weight) is the same, too.

But yes, I am short :) LOL. Don't remind me, tall guy!


the volume of a 6feet8 guy with 20 inch arms verses a 5feet8 guy with 20 inch arms. THE ARM VOLUME ON THE 6FEET8 GUY IS BIGGER. I suggest you go back to your introductory algebra


just like you said its like a cylinder

its like comparing a 4 inch pencil to a 6 inch pencil, both having equal thickness. the 6 inch pencil has more volume than the 4 inch.

oh and thanks for the negative karma scruples
 
Top Bottom