Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

This will b my first homosexual christmas.....

it will b a lil wierd but cool

bad thing is my sis is really pretty and my mom of corse wants the grand kids
 
Creepusmaximus said:
Why cool?
i mean it will be cool bc its my sis and i love her so i don't care

and she is a cool chick so we will all prolly have fun and make a few jokes

so thats what i mean the situation should b cool
 
Jon79 said:
i mean it will be cool bc its my sis and i love her so i don't care

and she is a cool chick so we will all prolly have fun and make a few jokes

so thats what i mean the situation should b cool

Still not cool. I don't care but i wouldn't say it's cool. So normal relations aren't cool? They're not and kind of boring so why should we say something abnormal is cool?
 
Creepusmaximus said:
Still not cool. I don't care but i wouldn't say it's cool. So normal relations aren't cool? They're not and kind of boring so why should we say something abnormal is cool?

So judgmental... I feel honored to meet someone so perfect. :rolleyes:
 
It's just family time with ur sister. Gay or not. Just remember she's ur sister just as she always was except she found a way to not put up with men drama. U won't need to listen to her whine about jerk-ass men. Plus, the two of you could go check out girls 2gether the next time u go out.
 
myway said:
It's just family time with ur sister. Gay or not. Just remember she's ur sister just as she always was except she found a way to not put up with men drama. U won't need to listen to her whine about jerk-ass men. Plus, the two of you could go check out girls 2gether the next time u go out.
can we have sex
 
Creepusmaximus said:
Still not cool. I don't care but i wouldn't say it's cool. So normal relations aren't cool? They're not and kind of boring so why should we say something abnormal is cool?
what i mean is there will be no wierd tension....thats all i meant is evryone will be "cool" with the situation.... no omg everyone look lesbians!!! how cool!!!

thats not what i meant
 
My mother is in the same boat. I have one older brother who has been with the same girl for almost 20 years now and they don't want kids. And I'm too petrified to have a kid with some woman I'm not in love with (and I don't believe in the whole "in love" thing to start with). Plus you can't trust women anyway, they just want your stuffs. So yeah, my poor mother.
 
What the hell are you doing up this late anyway? Should you be on E.C.A with the sleeping problems you already have?
 
Creepusmaximus said:
Still not cool. I don't care but i wouldn't say it's cool. So normal relations aren't cool? They're not and kind of boring so why should we say something abnormal is cool?

Homosexuality is not abnormal. I have a gay sister as well, she happens to be highly intelligent, just passed the Arizona Bar this summer and has been to every continent on this planet with the exception of South America. She has worked for a women's group in India, driven a commuter train in England (when the bombing happened), escorted tourists in Africa, bungee-jumped in New Zealand, and worked (National Science Foundation) the ice in Antartica for two years. She is currently teaching in China and her future plans are to work for Indigenous Nations all over the world. This is just a taste of her accomplishments....and she's done them all looking impeccably beautiful. :)
 
LuluDeren said:
Homosexuality is not abnormal.

Umm, yes it is. The purpose of sex is to reproduce. If everyone was homosexual, our species would perish rather quickly. All PC media bullshit aside, yes, homosexuality is abnormal from a biological viewpoint.



:cow:
 
samoth said:
Umm, yes it is. The purpose of sex is to reproduce. If everyone was homosexual, our species would perish rather quickly. All PC media bullshit aside, yes, homosexuality is abnormal from a biological viewpoint.



:cow:

Homesexuals at a Christmas gathering was the context. I appreciate your perspective from a biological standpoint, and there is always the spector of parthenogenesis. :artist:

Doesn't anyone appreciate Jeff Goldblum anymore?
 
LuluDeren said:
Homesexuals at a Christmas gathering was the context. I appreciate your perspective from a biological standpoint, and there is always the spector of parthenogenesis.

I was only countering your comment about something being "normal" when, on the grand biological scale, it most certainly isn't. So you argue that homosexuality is a remenant of asexual reproduction millions of years ago? lol



:cow:
 
samoth said:
I was only countering your comment about something being "normal" when, on the grand biological scale, it most certainly isn't. So you argue that homosexuality is a remenant of asexual reproduction millions of years ago? lol



:cow:
disappointed in your latent homophobia....out of YOU i expected better. :worried:
 
samoth said:
I was only countering your comment about something being "normal" when, on the grand biological scale, it most certainly isn't. So you argue that homosexuality is a remenant of asexual reproduction millions of years ago? lol



:cow:

I'm not arguing anything with you, Samoth, especially when you qualify your challenge with a 'lol'. I don't know enough about science and certainly not enough about speculative theory to argue with you. I agree that sex, when considered as nothing more than a purely reproductive task, then homosexual activity would be considered abnormal. (I believe this is the flagship arguement of the Catholic Chrurch) But we all know sex is loads more than that.
 
rnch said:
disappointed in your latent homophobia....out of YOU i expected better. :worried:


That's not a homophobic statement. He approached it from a purely biological standpoint. Not social.
 
LuluDeren said:
....I agree that sex, when considered as nothing more than a purely reproductive task, then homosexual activity would be considered abnormal. (I believe this is the flagship arguement of the Catholic Chrurch)....
does ANYONE really follow this flawed belief in 2007?
 
rnch said:
does ANYONE really follow this flawed belief in 2007?

Well it's not *flawed* in terms of sex as (singularly) reproduction, and *yes* in my experience, religious institutions use this as a basic doctrinal tenet supporting their belief that homosexuality is abnormal and sinful.
 
LuluDeren said:
Well it's not *flawed* in terms of sex as (singularly) reproduction, and *yes* in my experience, religious institutions use this as a basic doctrinal tenet supporting their belief that homosexuality is abnormal and sinful.


And then cover it up when their priests get caught pounding little boys in the ass.

It's all hypocrisy.

Cheers,
Scotsman
 
Creepusmaximus said:
Still not cool. I don't care but i wouldn't say it's cool. So normal relations aren't cool? They're not and kind of boring so why should we say something abnormal is cool?

this is violently, aggressively nonsensical.
 
rnch said:
disappointed in your latent homophobia....out of YOU i expected better. :worried:

I'm addressing the necessity of sexual reproduction for the propagation of species. The only reason you or I exist is via sexual reproduction. I'm not looking at indivudual choices, preferences, or even society; rather, the species and its survival.

I am looking at sex as a merely reproductive biological task here, and I am not differentiating humans from monkeys or pigs here, either. If we're looking at things from a current or societal standpoint, then my posts are moot.



:cow:
 
LuluDeren said:
I'm not arguing anything with you, Samoth, especially when you qualify your challenge with a 'lol'.

That's the second time I've been ripped on for using a "lol" in the past couple days here. :worried:



:cow:
 
samoth said:
That's the second time I've been ripped on for using a "lol" in the past couple days here. :worried:



:cow:


It's cause we all view you as a humorless dick so the lol confuses us.





































;)
LOL

Cheers,
Scotsman
 
LuluDeren said:
:D It's 'cause you're smarter than most of us and it makes us feel like retards.

I sometimes use "lol"s in the hopes of not coming across like a dick, too. It's obiously not working.



:cow:
 
samoth said:
Samote = Fail.


samoticon.gif


:D
 
samoth said:
I'm addressing the necessity of sexual reproduction for the propagation of species. The only reason you or I exist is via sexual reproduction. I'm not looking at indivudual choices, preferences, or even society; rather, the species and its survival.

I am looking at sex as a merely reproductive biological task here, and I am not differentiating humans from monkeys or pigs here, either. If we're looking at things from a current or societal standpoint, then my posts are moot.



:cow:

scientific pwnage
 
Top Bottom