riverrock said:Ass To The Grass Bro!
Nobody cares how much or how little you squat - they just want to you to squat it right.
So, drop a few pounds off the bar until your Ass is nerly sitting on the floor, hit the deck and start upping your weight from there.
Popeye1 said:I've done both.........all the way down and just a little shy of parallel. I rarely see anyone in my gym go anything even close to parallel. They are more concerned with how much weight is on the bar than how much they can actually move even a little...i.e. EGO!
You definitely need a certain minimum range of motion to get the maximum benefit from squats. What that minimum is, I'm not sure. I generally start to go shy of parallel as the weight gets heavier on my last couple of sets.....not on purpose.
Aside from the depth of the squat, the biggest mistake I see is leading with the hips instead of the knees. To say it another way, you see a lot of folding at the waist....more of a "power squat". Bodybuilders are more concerned with accomplishing what they call an "olympic squat"...it will build more muscle in the legs
slat1 said:If you are not going below parrallel you are not squatting.
*At my gym we bet on how far people are going to go down when they, eh hem, squat. The new thing is knee wraps. People put the on and go to like 45 degrees. Its a complete joke.
slat1 said:If you are not going below parrallel you are not squatting.
*At my gym we bet on how far people are going to go down when they, eh hem, squat. The new thing is knee wraps. People put the on and go to like 45 degrees. Its a complete joke.
Excidium28 said:Heres a basic squat from my ISSA personal trainer "Fitness complete guide"
![]()
Excidium28 said:Heres a basic squat from my ISSA personal trainer "Fitness complete guide"
![]()
Popeye1 said:Riverrock, if I'm not mistaken, doesn't that ISSA manual have a good explanation of an "olympic squat" vs. a "power squat" according to Dr. Squat (I forget his real name.)?
slat1 said:*I have also broken both ankles, had two knee surgeries and sprained my mcl. So the bullshit of "I have injuries so I can't go all the way down" is bullshit!
riverrock said:Hi Popeye1,
Haven't read the manual to be honest, but looking carefully at this picture from the angle it was taken, I would argue strongly that this is not parallel. Agree or disagree?
Malcolme said:Couldn't agree more than with some of the bros on this thread advocating full, deep squatting. My own background is that I am 44 and have been back in serious training for only three years, having coasted with irregular training for the best part of 20 years due to career and family demands. Full squats have been the backbone (no pun intended) of my "come back" - I was never that impressive in the first place!
I want to add some advice on the cadence of the movement and the rationale of basing one's routine around squatting - I don't think it is the depth of the squat which carries the oft-talked-about knee dangers but rather "bouncing". I believe it is vital to go down slowly and steadily and actively decelerate into the bottom position, coming to a halt like a building's lift with a gentle settling into the bottom position.
I have worked up gradually from next to nothing to a maximum of 15 very carefully performed reps. with three and a half plates each side in this style. I warm up progressively over at least three lighter sets and do just one set of peak weight squats. I do this every four to seven days, depending on my recuperation and gym schedule.
To this core exercise I attribute my reforming of my physique, at 6ft 3ins, from a pretty out of condition 240lbs to 285lbs in much better condition. (On the AAS front, I have done one "basic" cycle in each of the last three years, running test and dbol, tbol instead in the latest course, at moderate doses for no more than nine weeks at a time - first course 250mg enth. per week and 15mg dbol per day, second time 500mg enth. per week and 20mg dbol, most recently 750mg frontload, seven weeks at 500mg and 40mg tbol per day for 50 days starting on week three of the test. I believe in using AAS "strategically to hit new strength and size levels and then working a 9 month off period post-pct to try to get back up to one's chemically assisted high point. It's working for me.)
On a broader note, I think this post, although within the AAS forum, is in fact vital. I think we (the vast majority of bodybuilders who are never going to grace an IFBB stage) need to concentrate more on the basic and compound exercises - squatting, calves, overhead pressing, bench, a basic rowing movement and an occasional set or two of curls are just about all I do, split around a 3 day per week schedule. I see so many guys, including the chemically assisted ones, flapping around with concentration cable, pumping motions - and they hardly ever get any bigger. It is an absolute fact within my gym - a reasonably hardcore place - that the bigger guys are the minority who squat and that the biggest guys are the ones who squat in this kind of style.
Remember, a strong muscle is a big muscle and a muscle gets strong without getting injured with careful, non-bouncing, moderate volume hard work on the proven "big" compound movements.
SQUAT DEEP, SQUAT SLOWLY, SQUAT CAREFULLY - AND BE PREPARED TO GROW LIKE HELL!
jrlex said:How many of you guys go alll the way down when squatting..How many of you don't..Which is best?
Discuss..
Dial_tone said:I think you need to go parallel at least unless you have knee problems. I can lift more full squatting because I get that muscle tension at the bottom of the rep.
Popeye1 said:Riverrock, if I'm not mistaken, doesn't that ISSA manual have a good explanation of an "olympic squat" vs. a "power squat" according to Dr. Squat (I forget his real name.)?
Popeye1 said:Yeah, it definitely doesn't look parallel. Remember, when we say parallel, we mean the anterior portion of the thigh
Oh, and for anyone that says they don't squat because of their knees........research has shown that a properly done squat does not affect medial or lateral knee stability, rotational stability, or, anterior or posterior knee stability!

Tom Treutlein said:You know what I was always confused about? You're supposed to keep an arch in your back, right? Well, I can keep one until I break about five inches below parallel - then I can no longer feel the gap in my erectors. I'm guessing this is slightly rounding - my tailbone isn't a clear, straight shot up to the back of my neck, ya' know?
So...is this something to be avoiding? Is it due to lack of flexiblity? I can't see how since I can fall into a split, but...I don't want to fuck up my back, and lately it has been hurting.
psilo said:I go as deep as possible without loosing the arch in my back. If I truly go down as far as possible, the arch starts to flatten out, and I think this is dangerous (I'm talking at about 4-5 inches from the floor.) In general, I go well below parallel, usually to wear my hams just start to touch the top of my calves.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














