Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Someone please explain how Zimmerman can be tried by the Fed?

-SD-

EXT ELITE ROB
Chairman Member
I must be missing something because the FBI already cleared Zimmerman of any racially biased motives. Now Atty General Holder wants to go after him for civil rights violations. From what I understand zimmerman could not have violated anyones civil rights because he was not acting in any governmental capacity when he interacted with martin (i.e. zimmerman was not a cop or government employee using his position to violate anyones rights)
This is simply an individual killing another individual in self defense (trial by jury verdict not guilty) with no racial bias for any hate crime (FBI investigated and cleared him. The FBI is a Federal Government agency, not state or local).

So just what the fuck is Holder doing with this besides violating zimmermans right to not be in double jeapardy?
 
It's his prerogative to charge Zimmerman with a hate crime. Zimmerman not acting in "any governmental capacity" has nothing to do with it.

For what its worth, I dont think he will end up bringing charges and I dont think its a good idea for him to, either.
 
Im just waiting for the NRA to come out and say that if Trayvon was armed he might still be alive. :(
 
there was a racial hate crime committed... when zimmerman was called a cracker and was attacked, he was a victim of a hate crime racially motivated..
 
It's his prerogative to charge Zimmerman with a hate crime. Zimmerman not acting in "any governmental capacity" has nothing to do with it.

For what its worth, I dont think he will end up bringing charges and I dont think its a good idea for him to, either.

FBI investigated and cleared him of racial bias. I guess Holder doesnt recognize the FBI as a credible investigative agency of his own government.
 
Im just waiting for the NRA to come out and say that if Trayvon was armed he might still be alive. :(

They won't cause that's not who the NRA wants to be armed. Everyone up here in Canada thinks that guy goaded that kid into a physical altercation so he could use his gun. If Zimmerman had been required to open carry, the kid would have walked away. But he hid the fact he was carrying and started some shit that the kid rightly clipped his skates out for. If you're gonna walk around acting like a policeman than you ought to be open that you're packing. A neighborhood watchman should be able to observe and follow a 90 year old woman walking a poodle if he thinks she's up to fucking off. But all cards have to be on the table. Otherwise you're a weird prick fuck following people for no apparent reason. YOu can't take away people's right to watch their own neighborhoods, and if they carry they carry..but it's got to be out in the open or you have some right shit go down.
 
Didn't Zimmerman call Trayvon a "coon" while on the 911 call? That's probably where Holder got the idea, but I doubt he'd follow through with it.

On a related note: Fuck yo Federal Gov't.
 
it's repulsive to me that the federal government spends/expends vast amounts of money/resources on things like the steroids-in-baseball debacle, the michael vick illegal dog-fighting case and george-mother-fucking-zimmerman while there are under-equipped u.s. soldiers bleeding on the sand in the middle east...the baseball investigation was a complete fucking embarrassment and the other two cases?? the states where those acts were committed were perfectly capable of handling that shit themselves...lets make the federal government a little bigger mr. obama??? :rolleyes:
 
Most all hate crimes are prosecuted as civil rights violations.

On April 25, 2008, Jeremiah Munsen pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. Section 245(b)(2)(E) (interference with a federally protected activity), in connection with an incident on September 20, 2007, when he attempted to intimidate a group of African-American civil rights marchers by displaying two hangman’s nooses from the back of a pickup truck in Alexandria, Louisiana. The victims had just attended a massive civil rights rally in Jena, Louisiana, and were waiting at a bus depot for buses to return them to their home-state of Tennessee. On August 18, 2008, Munsen was sentenced to serve four months in prison, followed by one year supervised release.


On September 27, 2007, Kyle Shroyer pled guilty to federal conspiracy and civil rights offenses, admitting that he and co-conspirator Kyle Milbourn burned a cross in Muncie, Indiana, at the home of a white woman and her three bi-racial children. In January 2008, Shroyer was sentenced to 15 months in prison. On March 11, 2008, Milbourn was convicted by a federal jury for the federal conspiracy and civil rights offenses, as well as on a charge of obstruction of justice and a charge of using fire in the commission of a federal felony. In June 2008, Milbourn was sentenced to serve 10 years and 30 days in prison.

On August 1, 2006, a federal jury in Los Angeles convicted four Hispanic gang members of hate crimes and firearms violations in connection with a conspiracy to attack and kill African-Americans in the Los Angeles neighborhood claimed by the gang. The jury convicted the defendants of conspiring to violate the federally-protected housing rights of African-Americans; of violating the civil rights of an African-American man who was murdered as he attempted to park his car on a public street; and of using firearms during the commission of these offenses.
 
Most all hate crimes are prosecuted as civil rights violations.

Once again if the FBI cleared zimmerman of any racial bias, and the FBI is the investigative branch of the federal government, how can the federal government charge zimmerman with a hate crime?

So really, in order for anyone in this country to be free they must:
1. be found not guilty in a court of law by a jury of peers
2. if the races are different, the defendant has to be found to have had no racial bias by a seperate investigation by the FBI
3. hope and pray the US Dept of Justice doesnt put the defendant in double jeopardy


Im really trying to understand this because otherwise we have a big problem constitutionally speaking.
 
Most all hate crimes are prosecuted as civil rights violations.

On April 25, 2008, Jeremiah Munsen pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. Section 245(b)(2)(E) (interference with a federally protected activity), in connection with an incident on September 20, 2007, when he attempted to intimidate a group of African-American civil rights marchers by displaying two hangman’s nooses from the back of a pickup truck in Alexandria, Louisiana. The victims had just attended a massive civil rights rally in Jena, Louisiana, and were waiting at a bus depot for buses to return them to their home-state of Tennessee. On August 18, 2008, Munsen was sentenced to serve four months in prison, followed by one year supervised release.

Trayvon Martin was not marching for civil rights that night. Is walking down the street after getting skittles from the c-store a federally protected activity?

On September 27, 2007, Kyle Shroyer pled guilty to federal conspiracy and civil rights offenses, admitting that he and co-conspirator Kyle Milbourn burned a cross in Muncie, Indiana, at the home of a white woman and her three bi-racial children. In January 2008, Shroyer was sentenced to 15 months in prison. On March 11, 2008, Milbourn was convicted by a federal jury for the federal conspiracy and civil rights offenses, as well as on a charge of obstruction of justice and a charge of using fire in the commission of a federal felony. In June 2008, Milbourn was sentenced to serve 10 years and 30 days in prison.

Burning a cross in the yard of someone is hardly the same as a neighborhood watchman stopping someone on the street to ask whats going on

On August 1, 2006, a federal jury in Los Angeles convicted four Hispanic gang members of hate crimes and firearms violations in connection with a conspiracy to attack and kill African-Americans in the Los Angeles neighborhood claimed by the gang. The jury convicted the defendants of conspiring to violate the federally-protected housing rights of African-Americans; of violating the civil rights of an African-American man who was murdered as he attempted to park his car on a public street; and of using firearms during the commission of these offenses.

conspiracy to attack and kill, obviously not in the same ballpark

Once again Im not trying to instigate anything more, I genuinely think this precedent is very dangerous for everyone, not just one man who happened to kill another of different color. The president interjecting himself into a parochial law enforcement case (dont forget he also interjected himself in '09 when that black guy got arrested in cambridge, mass resulting in beer summit) and The federal government thumbing their nose at our criminal justice system is a very big problem for everyone.
 
You'd think he'd know that by now

he probably does...his response was likely for the benefit of others...hell, i think pretty much every girl dave has ever dated was a minority of one flavor or another...except crazy-internet-chick...but that wasn't really dating hahaha
 
3. hope and pray the US Dept of Justice doesnt put the defendant in double jeopardy
You mean like the Goldmans did with OJ? Civil charges should be up to the family to pursue. I have said several times I don't care if it's racially motivated or not. He should have kept his brown ass in the car. His unnecessary actions directly led to Trayvon's death. The end....literally.
 
They won't cause that's not who the NRA wants to be armed. Everyone up here in Canada thinks that guy goaded that kid into a physical altercation so he could use his gun. If Zimmerman had been required to open carry, the kid would have walked away. But he hid the fact he was carrying and started some shit that the kid rightly clipped his skates out for. If you're gonna walk around acting like a policeman than you ought to be open that you're packing. A neighborhood watchman should be able to observe and follow a 90 year old woman walking a poodle if he thinks she's up to fucking off. But all cards have to be on the table. Otherwise you're a weird prick fuck following people for no apparent reason. YOu can't take away people's right to watch their own neighborhoods, and if they carry they carry..but it's got to be out in the open or you have some right shit go down.

i stopped reading after "canada"
 
You mean like the Goldmans did with OJ? Civil charges should be up to the family to pursue. I have said several times I don't care if it's racially motivated or not. He should have kept his brown ass in the car. His unnecessary actions directly led to Trayvon's death. The end....literally.

precisely...and the burden of proof is much lower. i'm not sure what national interest the federal government believes they would be serving if the fbi already determined that the hate-crime threshold was not met?
 
You mean like the Goldmans did with OJ? Civil charges should be up to the family to pursue. I have said several times I don't care if it's racially motivated or not. He should have kept his brown ass in the car. His unnecessary actions directly led to Trayvon's death. The end....literally.

The Goldmans arent the Attorney General and dont have the power to charge OJ with any sort of crime after he was already found not guilty and cleared by the FBI.

Anybody can sue anybody in civil court and its different than criminal court.
 
Yup. The Martins are welcome to sue Zimmerman (but I sure wish we had a loser pays policy).

But Holder has no business in this. He needs to be more focused on Fast and Furious, Benghazi and the IRS scandals anyway.
 
Yup. The Martins are welcome to sue Zimmerman (but I sure wish we had a loser pays policy).

But Holder has no business in this. He needs to be more focused on Fast and Furious, Benghazi and the IRS scandals anyway.

As long as hes butting his nose into other peoples affairs, add detroit to the list
 
Yup. The Martins are welcome to sue Zimmerman (but I sure wish we had a loser pays policy).
.
Obviously there will be a countersuit and Zimmy will sue for legal costs and Twinkie money if he wins again.

All the juicy stuff that didn't make into the first trial will certainly make it into the civil suit.

In Zimmerman’s case, two pieces of character evidence never made it to the trial. First, a recorded statement from Witness No. 9, Zimmerman’s female cousin, in which she said that he molested her for ten years when they were both children, beginning when she just 6 years old. Second, a report filed in August 2005, when Zimmerman’s former fiancé sought a restraining order against him because of domestic violence.

Read more: Domestic Violence and George Zimmerman's Defense | The Nation Domestic Violence and George Zimmerman's Defense | The Nation
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook


Then again all the stuff about Trayvon being a drug using thug certainly will too.
 
Obviously there will be a countersuit and Zimmy will sue for legal costs and Twinkie money if he wins again.

All the juicy stuff that didn't make into the first trial will certainly make it into the civil suit.




Then again all the stuff about Trayvon being a drug using thug certainly will too.

We should get the FBI to investigate him. You know, since drugs are against federal law and they already cleared zimmerman of being a racist meanie.
 
Once again if the FBI cleared zimmerman of any racial bias, and the FBI is the investigative branch of the federal government, how can the federal government charge zimmerman with a hate crime?

So really, in order for anyone in this country to be free they must:
1. be found not guilty in a court of law by a jury of peers
2. if the races are different, the defendant has to be found to have had no racial bias by a seperate investigation by the FBI
3. hope and pray the US Dept of Justice doesnt put the defendant in double jeopardy


Im really trying to understand this because otherwise we have a big problem constitutionally speaking.

lol whatever you say Senator.

FYI pls research what "Double Jeopardy" protects against.
 
Zimmerman's already suing NBC for defamation of character. He's got to make some money off this ordeal. It's not interesting enough for the usual book/movie deal.
 
lol whatever you say Senator.

FYI pls research what "Double Jeopardy" protects against.

From wiki:

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.
 
Zimmerman's already suing NBC for defamation of character. He's got to make some money off this ordeal. It's not interesting enough for the usual book/movie deal.

Thats the one reason I hope the Martin family files a civil suit; to prevent Zimmerman from profiting off of this ordeal via a book deal. I'm sure well see him as a Fox analyst/contributor a year from now.
 
From wiki:

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.

I know - I just dont think that SD realizes that Holder isnt thinking about charging Zimmerman with the same crime he was just found not guilty of.
 
Obviously there will be a countersuit and Zimmy will sue for legal costs and Twinkie money if he wins again.

All the juicy stuff that didn't make into the first trial will certainly make it into the civil suit.




Then again all the stuff about Trayvon being a drug using thug certainly will too.

The US court system is among the worst in the world for recovering court costs. It's a fucked-up mess.
 
I know - I just dont think that SD realizes that Holder isnt thinking about charging Zimmerman with the same crime he was just found not guilty of.

Obviously he isnt charging with murder2, yes I know that. The issue is if the FBI has cleared of any racial bias, then why is holder threatening charging zimmy with a crime involving racial bias?

We always hear of "the spirit of the law".

dont you think the spirit of the constitution as it applies to double jeapordy applies here?
 
But again, I think its a shit idea and the government would probably lose the case.
 
PS you guys gotta stop yelling "unconstitutional" at everything you dont agree with.
 
I know - I just dont think that SD realizes that Holder isnt thinking about charging Zimmerman with the same crime he was just found not guilty of.

What Holder is considering is a clever way of putting Zimmerman in double-jeopardy, without explicitly charging him with the same crime.

If the jury was only given the opportunity to choose murder in the second degree, then yes -- there would be some room to argue. But the jury also could have found him guilty of manslaughter.

In the absence of a manslaughter conviction (or similar lesser conviction), it is implicit that the jury found Zimmerman not guilty of any form of criminal murder. A more clever prosecutor would have realize that the battle was lost and not asked for manslaughter. That would have left enough ambiguity for the feds to step in and continue prosecuting Zimmerman.
 
Yea we wouldnt want the constitution getting in the way of things, my bad rob

Or we wouldnt want to cry wolf about stuff being unconstitutional when its obvious that its not. Might not pay attention when something that is unconstitutional actually occurs. Just sayin.
 
In the absence of a manslaughter conviction (or similar lesser conviction), it is implicit that the jury found Zimmerman not guilty of any form of criminal murder. A more clever prosecutor would have realize that the battle was lost and not asked for manslaughter. That would have left enough ambiguity for the feds to step in and continue prosecuting Zimmerman.

Shocked that we agree.
 
Shocked that we agree.

Well hell. Let me re-think my position then.

And yes, I'm just joking. I'd only do that if I found myself agreeing with RedScam(TM). I can't violate my underlying beliefs in Plunk-o-Pathy.
 
Gotta have standards I guess.
 
Or we wouldnt want to cry wolf about stuff being unconstitutional when its obvious that its not. Might not pay attention when something that is unconstitutional actually occurs. Just sayin.

highly unusual for a sitting president and attorney general to interject into a local law enforcement case, that sort of thing gets my attention.
 
In the absence of a manslaughter conviction (or similar lesser conviction), it is implicit that the jury found Zimmerman not guilty of any form of criminal murder. A more clever prosecutor would have realize that the battle was lost and not asked for manslaughter. That would have left enough ambiguity for the feds to step in and continue prosecuting Zimmerman.
Admit defeat and watch the Feds do what you couldn't?

come-on-son1.jpg
 
found this..

Since Trayvon Martin has his unfortunate death there have been 480 blacks killed in Chicago alone
 
Im sure you cry yourself to sleep every night.
 
Where's the outrage over the black kid here in Milwaukee who was 13 and shot by his 73 yr old deebs lookin neighbor?

I doubt any of you have heard much about it.
 
Was the neighbor arrested and charged with a crime? Lets try to remember that much of the attention paid to the Martin case was because it took more than a month (or thereabouts) following the shooting for the cops to investigate and arrest Zimmerman.

That plus the absurdity for Florida's version of the stand your ground law made it a much more interesting case for the media to run with.
 
What about the stand by your man law, wasn't that Hillary Clinton's law?
 
Where's the outrage over the black kid here in Milwaukee who was 13 and shot by his 73 yr old deebs lookin neighbor?

I doubt any of you have heard much about it.

My guess is that people on Milwaukee don't give enough of a shit to let people know...bunch of racists, the whole lot of them!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
 
Belize just keeps looking better and better

I love Belize, many reasons to go there, business and pleasure.
 
Was the neighbor arrested and charged with a crime? Lets try to remember that much of the attention paid to the Martin case was because it took more than a month (or thereabouts) following the shooting for the cops to investigate and arrest Zimmerman.

That plus the absurdity for Florida's version of the stand your ground law made it a much more interesting case for the media to run with.

You've got google nigga; I'm not your slave. (According to shrek, that's not racist). The arrest wasn't made initially bc it was never warranted in the first place.
 
My guess is that people on Milwaukee don't give enough of a shit to let people know...bunch of racists, the whole lot of them!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

You sound very racist to me.
 
If the police chief is forced to resign for not arresting him, the FBI clears him of any racial bias, a jury finds him not guilty of not only murder but manslaughter, theres a pretty good chance he werent supposed to be arrested in the first place.

this is according to law, not knee jerk emotion.

If we are going down the path of a nation controlled by emotion instead of reason and law, weve got much bigger problems.
 
If we are going down the path of a nation controlled by emotion instead of reason and law, weve got much bigger problems.

that's how liberal work broski, just look at how they approach gun control, all emotion - no facts.
 
I've talked on twitter and facebook over the Darius Simmins murder (in Milwaukee) since the shooting. The mother witnessed her son get shot multiple times by this idiot ( who was found GUILTY of first drgree murder. ) He decides to shoot the kid over his stolen guns. The police decided to ransack Patricia Larry's house looking for the stolen guns. They didnt find them the first time when they were reported stolen, decide to search again while the kid is dead in the street. So I personally rebuked Milkaukee police for them basically taking sides with a murderer

Sent from my SCH-I545 using EliteFitness
 
1. I dont believe the initial investigation was thorough especially on the profiling aspect. The community complained about blacks breaking in houses. But when a body is laying dead in the grass, race all of a sudden has nothing to do with it.

2. The blood evidence on GZ or Trayvon was not complete. Since they basically let GZ go due to stand your ground, he didnt get a medical exam then.

3. The gun was dusted for prints.. Thats old school. There are new ways to find prints that are more accurate. Not to mention the entire gun was not searched.

4. The stand your ground law needs to be repealed. Theres a case in Phoenix where a hispanic Daniel adkins was shot by a black guy Jude. Jude says adkins swung a pipe at his car. When the police get there... no pipe. He still did not get arrested..... IMHO these investigations initially arent being handled. Anyway, Daniel Adkins's folks are still looking for justice and they havent gotten any press attention.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using EliteFitness
 
I wish there was someway they could have compelled Zimmerman to take a lie detector test or recount the events under the influence of sodium pentathol. If he just followed the kid he should be allowed to do it. Whether he profiled him or not is irrelevant. What he's not allowed to do is to stop someone and ask them their business. Police and police only are allowed to do that. If Trayvon flew off the handle just cause someone was following him, than Zimmerman was justified in using his weapon. If Zimmerman in any way shape or form verbally confronted Trayvon he should have lost his SYG rights. And I hope that's what comes of this, that they modify SYG rules. If you instigate an altercation than you should lose your SYG umbrella. Then you gotta man up and fight and take your assbeating if it comes.

Also these neighborhood watchmen should be required to open carry if they insist on being armed. If trayvon had seen the gun he probably would still be alive.
 
I wish there was someway they could have compelled Zimmerman to take a lie detector test or recount the events under the influence of sodium pentathol. If he just followed the kid he should be allowed to do it. Whether he profiled him or not is irrelevant. What he's not allowed to do is to stop someone and ask them their business. Police and police only are allowed to do that. If Trayvon flew off the handle just cause someone was following him, than Zimmerman was justified in using his weapon. If Zimmerman in any way shape or form verbally confronted Trayvon he should have lost his SYG rights. And I hope that's what comes of this, that they modify SYG rules. If you instigate an altercation than you should lose your SYG umbrella. Then you gotta man up and fight and take your assbeating if it comes.

Also these neighborhood watchmen should be required to open carry if they insist on being armed. If trayvon had seen the gun he probably would still be alive.

Wtf? Are you that retarded?
Sodium pentathol?
Dude lay off the cartoons and leave the basement for some fresh air and a brief encounter reality.
What authority do you think you can usurp? I love how you fully investigated this situation and now have come to the conclusion he should loose his SYG rights? You should have a lobotomy and your testicals destroyed so you can't contribute to increase the number of ignorant people in this universe.
 
Wtf? Are you that retarded?
Sodium pentathol?
Dude lay off the cartoons and leave the basement for some fresh air and a brief encounter reality.
What authority do you think you can usurp? I love how you fully investigated this situation and now have come to the conclusion he should loose his SYG rights? You should have a lobotomy and your testicals destroyed so you can't contribute to increase the number of ignorant people in this universe.

Did you notice his post began with the words "I wish"?
 
Did you notice his post began with the words "I wish"?

Lol. We all have wishes. Guess what?
Regardless it's a retarded comment filled with ideological ignorance.
 
Juries just need to start nullifying SYG all together IMHO. If Rick Scott ( or other governors ) wont work to mak sensensible adjustments then the jury can ignore this law if they choose, and send the perp to jail

Sent from my SCH-I545 using EliteFitness

Is this a wish too?
Lol
 
Lie detectors, sodium pentathol, juries disregarding the laws. Everyone loves juries to "do the right thing regardless of the law" until the jury disregards laws you agree with then youre pissed and all of a sudden the jury went " rogue"

Sure why not. Ever since the patriot act we've told the constitution to fuck off. And the trend continues
 
Lie detectors, sodium pentathol, juries disregarding the laws. Everyone loves juries to "do the right thing regardless of the law" until the jury disregards laws you agree with then youre pissed and all of a sudden the jury went " rogue"

Sure why not. Ever since the patriot act we've told the constitution to fuck off. And the trend continues

Fuck yo constitution
 
Stand your ground wasnt used as a defense in zimmerman trial. Theres a difference between SYG and regular self defense law. he was found not guilty from regular ass self defense not SYG. Dont know why this is so hard to grasp.
 
Last edited:
Stand your ground wasnt used as a defense in zimmerman trial. Theres a difference between SYG and regular self defense law. he was found not from regular ass self defense not SYG. Dont know why this is so hard to grasp.

Retards cant grasp shit.
 
Wtf? Are you that retarded?
Sodium pentathol?
Dude lay off the cartoons and leave the basement for some fresh air and a brief encounter reality.
What authority do you think you can usurp? I love how you fully investigated this situation and now have come to the conclusion he should loose his SYG rights? You should have a lobotomy and your testicals destroyed so you can't contribute to increase the number of ignorant people in this universe.


Holy fuck did you read and/or comprehend a single part of my post? I mean holy fuck did you completely miss the whole point. Stfu about lobotomies and whatnot cause you just made the dumbest post of the week. I only offered the scenario, now stay with me you muppet, where "IF" it went down like that no one should be able to invoke SYG. I fully stated in that post that we will never have anything but Zimmermans word on what happened and my comments about lie detector tests or drug administration were purely hypothetical because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY WE CAN'T COMPEL PEOPLE THAT WAY OR ELSE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE, right?


Holy fuck you're a stupid cunt did I mention that? No? well you're a stupid cunt for sure mate. :coffee:
 
I wish there was someway they could have compelled Zimmerman to take a lie detector test or recount the events under the influence of sodium pentathol. If he just followed the kid he should be allowed to do it. Whether he profiled him or not is irrelevant. What he's not allowed to do is to stop someone and ask them their business. Police and police only are allowed to do that. If Trayvon flew off the handle just cause someone was following him, than Zimmerman was justified in using his weapon. If Zimmerman in any way shape or form verbally confronted Trayvon he should have lost his SYG rights. And I hope that's what comes of this, that they modify SYG rules. If you instigate an altercation than you should lose your SYG umbrella. Then you gotta man up and fight and take your assbeating if it comes.

Also these neighborhood watchmen should be required to open carry if they insist on being armed. If trayvon had seen the gun he probably would still be alive.

The retardedness of this post is just spectacular.

Know what I wish? I wish we could grind-up useless wastes of time and resources like you and blend them into pet food.

But I won't get my wish either.
 
The retardedness of this post is just spectacular.

Know what I wish? I wish we could grind-up useless wastes of time and resources like you and blend them into pet food.

But I won't get my wish either.



I wish we could take emasculated ninny's like you and blend you all up into cattle feed, have you seen what they're allowed to feed cattle these days? Surely some emasculated lady boy fgt meat should pass muster, don't you think? Can I make a wish foundation?
 
Top Bottom