Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Should we allow discussion of UG's if they are their own rep?

Should we allow posting of ug labs' names?

  • YES

    Votes: 48 64.9%
  • NO

    Votes: 25 33.8%

  • Total voters
    74
Status
Not open for further replies.

used2juice

New member
Pretty simple question, yes or no. The simple truth is that MOST ug's are their own rep. So with that being said, here is the poll for Mr. X and other mods to see what everyone thinks.

Vote YES if you think we should be able to talk about ug labs' products, etc.

Vote NO if you do not think we should mention names of ug's at all.
 
we had a talk about this before, I asked the member to give feedback...it was 50/50, but let's see how this poll goes. IMO, allowing steroid source posts with the word "lab" in the end is wrong.
 
I can't vote on this - This place is starting to make me "ill"

NO COMMON SENSE anymore
 
Mr.X said:
we had a talk about this before, I asked the member to give feedback...it was 50/50, but let's see how this poll goes. IMO, allowing steroid source posts with the word "lab" in the end is wrong.

Yeah, I was a part of that thread. I just wanna see a quantitative value assessed. That way if even 51 of 100 people think one thing, that will tell you what the "majority" of the board feels. (:
 
itlnstln said:
I can't vote on this - This place is starting to make me "ill"

NO COMMON SENSE anymore

Was there ever common sense here? I've been around since 99 and there has always been drama, always been big egos, always been noobs...always been a little senseless. But in the end, it's still nice to be here. Even you, after being "ill," are still here...so it must offer you something you don't wanna let go of. ;)
 
itlnstln said:
I can't vote on this - This place is starting to make me "ill"

NO COMMON SENSE anymore


I agree! The last 4 months have become quite "pathetic" and "silly' to say the least, right Stallion? :coffee:
 
I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be allowed if only the name of the lab is used and no reference to the 'source' is included......

I.E. British Dragon has some quality products........

Or, AG is a little overpriced for my taste......

There is no way of knowing who is behind the 'lab' if posts are kept simple and to the point....

PG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom