cboogsrun said:
I was referring to the 87 billion dollars Bush went to congress for. So your right it doesn't have anything to do with Korea. I personally think Korea needs much more attention then Iraq. I also think their needs to be more thought put into this altercation than was the case with Iraq. I would also think by your post your either Christ and have never made a mistake or don't have children. Compassion isn't a weakness its a comodity..
I have 3 children, I am unable to perform miracles nor do I walk on water,and I have made many mistakes the "difference" is I don't expect a tax payer somewhere in America to pay for my mistakes. As to compassion. I am involved in more charitable work that probably 99% of the people on this forum. I am one of the major fund raisers for Benefit4kids an alternative to Make-A-Wish. With a son who has CP, I am one of the board members of the local CP chapter, and I am involved in numerous church charities and Farmers and Hunters Feeding the Hungry.
The distinction is my goal is to let private sector from their hearts do it instead of having laws made to steal tax payers income which is poorly spent and often mismanaged. Case in point so far the government has found 1.4 BILLION dollars worth of fraud committed by Katrina victims. That's YOUR money and mine wasted by a bloated bueracracy and being fleeced by the "victims"!
cboogsrun said:
BOOGS: I believe there have been an assload of tax breaks, so noones assets are being seized. I think the budget needs to be handled better and priorities need to be redefined..
Yes there have been tax breaks and they have STIMULATED the economy leading to record home sales and the creation of millions of new jobs. That is a good thing and I;m glad you recognize it, BUT people still pay taxes and thus assets are being seized. Every paycheck you get your assets, my assets, and any person in this Nation with a job that involves a paycheck is having a significant portion of the assets i.e income seized. I paid over $370,000 in state and Federal taxes last year. Money that was SEIZED from me by the Federal government at risk of imprisonment if I did not pay!
cboogsrun said:
BOOGS: Again, I would think you don't have kids. The conversation has shifted from NKorea to Iraq because we are currently in conflict with Iraq and have a substantial amount of troops there. Not to mention Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afgan. It is a legitimate point that we are spread thin. I would wonder if a draft card would change your views..
Again you are all over the board and unable to concentrate on one cogent point. What does having children have to do with North Korea and ICBM's....no wait it has everything to do with children as I don't want a bomb to land near their school one day and incincerate them so I feel we need to STOP NK from their goals of nuclear missles.
cboogsrun said:
BOOGS: There are about a million different variables and anyone can make a good argument for their point of view, and I respect every knowledgeable view. I happen to have been in the Army and know that troops don't get taken care of. Soldiers are just a number in the governments computer system. I have 4 very close friends in Iraq and Afgan right now. Not to mention a personal friend of mine that was killed in combat. James C. Kearney III..
Served in the Air Force and I am proud of that fact.
cboogsrun said:
BOOGS: I think I'll stay in the lane that is for the "felt dooped by Iraq and am very suspicious of our leadership" lane..
Well that's a new lane as that's the first time you mentioned it even though this thread has NOTHING to do with Iraq, but with KOREA. So I guess this means you admit defeat on the issue of taxes and tax breaks and funding education and so on???
cboogsrun said:
BOOGS: Minorities get huge breaks on all sorts of things. Lets say for example if you are a minority employer you can get the gov. to pay for a portion of your equipment, bid on certain jobs that others can't, ect.... When was the last time you heard of the United Caucasion College Fund? She's black, its relevant..
I agree minorities should NOT be given tax breaks and you said she was "ripped off" and "a minority" which again has nothing to do with your newly announced position about the NAACP, UNCF, or the non existant UCCF
cboogsrun said:
BOOGS: So you don't believe in welfare at all then? Up until this comment you have made a very good presentation of yourself. It sounds like you don't think anyone deserves a hand up, since you had to do it the hard way. Very selfish in my opinion and spitef.
Now you are putting words in my mouth. First off since I did it the hard way then ANYONE can, but you don't want people to do it the hard way. You want myslef and others to be forced to shoulder the cost, even while admitting people are abusing the programs.
My whole point in telling you my story is your position that the Federal government is the answer is Bull Shit. I and my two brothers PROVE that 3 poor kids can bust their asses, work shitty jobs, study hard and make a life in this world with "MINIMAL" assistance from the Federal government.
My one brother is a journalist, the other is in LE at a top level, and I have a medical financial legal company. We gained our life goals despite our adversities. And it did suck and was tough. I lived on peanuts, bananas, and dorm food. I didn't have a coool stereo, an Ipod, computer in my room, a car, a nice apartment, I had NOTHING. I worked for everything I own as did my two brothers. Our father instilled in us a work ethic that if you want something in life you EARN it not have it handed to you.
I believe in welfare for the truly needy. We do need a social safety net, but forcing the tax payers to pay for the mistakes of your friends or the young woman that has 7 kids out of wedlock by choice is NOT my definition of welfare and welfare is BEST propvided by the private sector and it's more efficient.
I believe in freedom and personal choice and the private sector helping (by the way this year will set a record of private sector donations to the tune of 268 BILLION dollars in charitable gift giving) you believe and support the concept of enabling the Federal Government to seize the assets of others, at a degree and percentage of their income that YOU feel is fair (most likely the more they make the more you take), and for some punitive measure to punish them for being "filthy rich" and "greedy", to fund a host of social issues that you feel should be funded despite the choices the people made in life that got them where they are today.
If you decide to get a girl pregnant, drop out of school, smoke 3 packs a day, drink like Ted Kennedy, and then 15 years from now need food stamps, and dozens of medications then I feel I have the right to look you right in the eye and say Dude you made your life choices and it's YOUR responsibility to deal with them and it's NOT your right to use the Federal governments threat of prison to confiscate a portion of my wealth to pay for your mistakes.
That's it in a nut shell. You do NOT believe in any sort of personal responsibility or someone bearing the burden financially or otherwise of their poor decisions, but want to be able to force me and others to bail them out time and time and time again.
My way is freedom your way is not!