Low IQ and Conservative Beliefs linked to Prejudice

[Spartacus]

The chart is not written in todays Dollar Values Dumbass..
Its from records of the time.

Here's where the Chart fucking came from
Reagan’s Budget Legacy

Yes the CATO institute

why do you fight with me
the best outcome you can hope for is I leave
stilleto

 

[Spartacus]

or do you want to get down to the nitty gritty
cut and paste pro

 

[brownbrown]

why do you fight with me
the best outcome you can hope for is I leave
stilleto

Or you change the subject, or you start serial posting youtube.
LOLOLOL

 

[Spartacus]

Or you change the subject, or you start serial posting youtube.
LOLOLOL

you can't even figure out how to do that
do one

 

[ledhead]

Reagan is too left for the GOP of this Millinium
Thats the fact, and my point.

Oh and he built up the Military because of the Cold War. Reason #1

Yep, and it worked, the Soviet Union went bankrupt trying to keep up with the US in the arms race. Consequently, the Soviet Union fell, brilliant plan... Second, he spent all the money on the military so the dems could not spend money on their entitlement programs... lol..


So tell me what you think, would Reagan still be in the Primary for the GOP this year?

Yes, here is the deal. Reagan did not take anyone's crap. He did not compromise with the Soviets, terrorists nor the dems. He controlled the entire enviroment, the dems hated him but they respected him and he basically bullied them. Someone mentioned he worked with the dems, lol, yeah, under his terms..

Look, Reagan was the most conservative president in the history of the US, save Washington and Lincoln of course. These fools who are running for the GOP are nominal conservatives, maybe, Newt is a little more of a constitutionalist than the other two. But this litmus test you speak of is a catchphrase, a slogan, political rhetoric to garner public support...

Reagan would have done it his way. Newt and Santorum try to emulate Reagan, Paul is out in left field taking a crap. He talks a big game but he forgets there is something called separation of powers, which only Reagan was able to transcend above, heck, he still has I think one or two Justices still in the Supreme Court he appointed..

Hard-line rhetoric, uncompromsing ideology, and being a staunch, and unmoving ideologue made Reagan great... to throw up bias links and generalize about his presidency is absurd.. There is so much to it, it would take a lot of time to gather all the primary facts and come up with the most probabilities- I work in an enviroment where 90% of the people are ultra left, now they are conceding that Reagan was really, and truly a great president.

These fools who are running for GOP and Obama would not last 2 minustes debating Reagan. Google: The Reagan/Mondale debate.. lolololololololol -

 

[Spartacus]

it's known as a decision loop or cascade
you get your opponent on the backend to respond to your maneuvers
when you acquire the advantage in the feedback loop
you win because your opponent(s) is operating from a depreciating position
ask ledhead

 

[Spartacus]

in short
be one step ahead

 

[brownbrown]

Yes, here is the deal. Reagan did not take anyone's crap. He did not compromise with the Soviets, terrorists nor the dems. He controlled the entire enviroment, the dems hated him but they respected him and he basically bullied them. Someone mentioned he worked with the dems, lol, yeah, under his terms..

Look, Reagan was the most conservative president in the history of the US, save Washington and Lincoln of course. These fools who are running for the GOP are nominal conservatives, maybe, Newt is a little more of a constitutionalist than the other two. But this litmus test you speak of is a catchphrase, a slogan, political rhetoric to garner public support...

Reagan would have done it his way. Newt and Santorum try to emulate Reagan, Paul is out in left field taking a crap. He talks a big game but he forgets there is something called seperation of powers, which only Reagan was able to transcend above, heck, he still has I think one or two Justices still in the Supreme Court he appointed..

Hard-line rhetoric, uncompromsing ideology, and being a staunch, and unmoving ideologue made Reagan great... to throw up bias links and generalize about his presidency is absurd.. There is so much to it, it would take a lot of time to gather all the primary facts and come up with the most probabilities- I work in an enviroment where 90% of the people are ultra left, now they are conceding that Reagan was really, and truly a great president.

These fools who are running for GOP and Obama would not last 2 minustes debating Reagan. Google: The Reagan/Mondale debate.. lolololololololol -

So you think he'd still be in the primary?

It's not the 80's anymore, he wouldn't have even won as many states as Ron Paul has so far.

The Litmus test is real, . Just like there's a litmus test for Dem Canidates.

Having a postion in line with your party is how you win the Nomination. Going against the Grain won't get you anywhere. Ask Huntsman,Roemer,Perry, Paul.

Even romney knows this and tries to stay in Litmus test lines.

Walter M. Never had a chance. It's not what Reagan did right, It was Mondale was a loss from the beginning. G. Ferraro / Carter ect.

 

[Spartacus]

still haven't managed to post a youtube vid

 

[Spartacus]

mr db do you ever play with your cat before it's had a chance to do it's stretching?