Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Largest Animal Shelter in U.S. Will House 2 Dogs Trained to Have Sex With Women

p0ink

New member
Largest Animal Shelter in U.S. Will House 2 Dogs Trained to Have Sex With Women
Tuesday, July 22, 2008

E-Mail Print Share:

OKLAHOMA CITY — The nation's largest animal sanctuary has agreed to accept two dogs that authorities say were trained to have sex with women.

A mixed breed and a Labrador, formerly owned by Diane Sue Whalen of Tulsa County, have been accepted by the Best Friends Animal Society in Kanab, Utah, said Barbara Williamson, spokeswoman for the animal sanctuary.

The dogs — named Lucky and Buddy — will be taken to the no-kill sanctuary next month.

Whalen, 54, and Donald Roy Seigfried, 55, were charged with felony crimes against nature after Whalen's adult son found more than 150 tapes of his mother performing sex acts with her dogs and a blue heeler owned by Seigfried. Seigfried was accused of filming the acts.

The dogs were placed in the Tulsa Animal Shelter following the arrests. While Whalen relinquished custody of her dogs, Seigfried is fighting for ownership of the blue heeler, named Merlin.

Earlier this month, a judge ordered that the dogs be examined by a veterinarian and found suitable for adoption before being placed in homes. Both of Whalen's dogs have been deemed adoptable.

The dogs were neutered at a Tulsa veterinary clinic. Jamee Suarez, president and founder of the Oklahoma Alliance for Animals, said the dogs are healthy and are recovering from their surgeries.

The Oklahoma Alliance for Animals is a nonprofit organization that works with the Tulsa County sheriff's office on cases involving animal cruelty.

Volunteers for the organization will drive the dogs more than 1,000 miles to the animal sanctuary in Utah. Once there, the dogs will become candidates for adoption.

"Each dog (at the sanctuary) is treated as an individual," said Williamson, the sanctuary spokeswoman. "We felt we could help these dogs."

A deputy who investigated the case had recommended that the dogs be euthanized and wrote in court affidavits that they had been trained to rape.

Williamson said euthanizing the dogs would have been "the easy thing to do."

"These dogs are totally victims," she said.

The sanctuary has room for 2,000 animals, mostly dogs and cats. Williamson said there are that many "urgent pleas" every month asking the shelter to take in animals.

Animals that are not adopted live permanently at the sanctuary.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,388501,00.html
 
Damn busted by your child. And reported at that.

She ugly too. Poor dogs.

P.S. P0inks back and he is the weird news finder king.
 
Damn that is sick... I feel wierd with my dog in the same room as me while i'm having sechs, I can feel him watching me.
 
SaladFork said:
Damn that is sick... I feel wierd with my dog in the same room as me while i'm having sechs, I can feel him watching me.


...and thinking he could do a better job.
 
Those dogs are going to be pissed off.

After a few days they are going to be saying "Rescue??? I have not had a good bj in over 2 days".

Of course it will sound like this "Ruff, ruff ruff ruff ruff ruff 2 ruff." and nobody will understand them so they will assume they are happier.
 
AAP said:
If you have ever visited Alabama or Southside Atlanta, you will realize it already is.


2cokjsl.jpg
 
p0ink said:
wow - what do you do when you find 150 videos of your mom having sex with your pets while your dad films it?

pics of the perps can be found here: http://newsok.com/article/3262499


Don't even wanna look. Guaranteed they're fucked up looking. You can always tell by the eyes. Usually have this unfocused, slightly frightened, or generally just flat out disturbing look to them.
 
give the dogs a good (i.e. normal) home and give the owners the chair.
 
Just a question... it wasn't reported that the finishing move was a shot of mace to the dog... was it? Just askin....
 
GoldenDelicious said:
as beyond disgusting as this is, i dont see that people should be sent to jail for it

why is that? the sex is not between two consenting parties.
 
BIKINIMOM said:
LOL Did the dog say, "No?"

Dude I would never condone cruelty to animals but "rape"?

You are joking... right?

i'm not joking. you are taking an animal and forcing it to participate in an unnatural sex act. i don't see how you don't see that as rape.
 
p0ink said:
i'm not joking. you are taking an animal and forcing it to participate in an unnatural sex act. i don't see how you don't see that as rape.

Ummm because it is an animal.

Is the animal being penetrated or did the animal do the penetrating?

Not saying that it isn't sick and depraved for THE HUMAN but what should be done for the dog... you know, the one who humps everybody's leg anyway?

My sister has a miniature dachshund that LOVES to push his little peepee out when he sees me and hump my arm. So now, was he raping me or was I raping him with my arm?

Come on, this whole thing sounds ludicrous.

The humans were sick, no doubt. But the dogs being "raped", especially when they were penetrating the human?

You have GOT to be kidding me.
 
so there has to be penetration to be rape? hmm...don't know about that.

secondly, how is it any more excusable because it is an animal being abused?

you have no problem labeling it abuse, but yet you have issues with it being called rape? why is that?

what if someone performed psychological experiments on you in which the end result was you to engaging in sexual activities which were completely foreign and unnatural to you but yet had no real control over? would that not be rape?
 
BIKINIMOM said:
Ummm because it is an animal.

Is the animal being penetrated or did the animal do the penetrating?

Not saying that it isn't sick and depraved for THE HUMAN but what should be done for the dog... you know, the one who humps everybody's leg anyway?

My sister has a miniature dachshund that LOVES to push his little peepee out when he sees me and hump my arm. So now, was he raping me or was I raping him with my arm?

Come on, this whole thing sounds ludicrous.

The humans were sick, no doubt. But the dogs being "raped", especially when they were penetrating the human?

You have GOT to be kidding me.



LOL, yes he was raping you and your husband should shoot it, because it will never learn its lesson. Just kidding, stop raping little dogs with your arm! :chomp:
 
chris302001 said:
LOL, yes he was raping you and your husband should shoot it, because it will never learn its lesson. Just kidding, stop raping little dogs with your arm! :chomp:

Nah... he didn't bite me he was just getting "friendly" with me.

I was mortified that he did this LOL I said to my sister, "Dude, can't you get this little horny bastard fixed or something. I ain't cheating on my husband no matter how cute this furry beast is."

Come on.... the dog was being raped for being trained to have sex with female humans?

Have all American's lost their fucking minds?
 
p0ink said:
so there has to be penetration to be rape? hmm...don't know about that.

secondly, how is it any more excusable because it is an animal being abused?

you have no problem labeling it abuse, but yet you have issues with it being called rape? why is that?

what if someone performed psychological experiments on you in which the end result was you to engaging in sexual activities which were completely foreign and unnatural to you but yet had no real control over? would that not be rape?

I didn't say the dogs were being abused.

I am human. They are dogs.

If the dogs were being penetrated (like I have heard all sorts of stories of men doing sheep) then I could see that maybe was abusive if it physically hurt the animal but that is it.

There is no way IN HELL you are going to get me to treat these dogs the same way I would any dog that was humping my arm or your leg.

That is ridiculous.
 
p0ink said:
so, there has to be pain and penetration involved to be rape? interesting.

No there has to be a human being that is being violated in order for there to be rape.

I know way too much about what it's like to be raped. And allow me to share with you that yes, there was a WHOLE LOT of pain and penetration when I was raped. I find it highly insulting that you could equate a dog being trained to have sex with a human female to that of a "rape victim" when EVERY DOG will hump anything that can't move away.

Did they give the dogs anti-depressants and have them tell the docs about their puppyhood and how they weren't suckled long enough? Did they have them do doggy-art therapy perhaps? Did they play games with the dogs where the dogs pointed to the private parts on a stuffed scooby-do doll and tell how much anguish they felt when their doggy peepees went into the filthy human's vagina and the horror of it all being caught on tape for all of their doggy friends and family to see?!

Seriously... I don't know if this article is more insulting or ridiculous. :whatever:
 
so, if i set a dog on fire would that not be abuse? if i didn't feed a dog for weeks would that not be neglect?

then how would forcing a dog to perform unnatural sex acts not be considered rape?

don't let your own personal hangups prevent you from calling a spade a spade.
 
p0ink said:
so, if i set a dog on fire would that not be abuse? if i didn't feed a dog for weeks would that not be neglect?

then how would forcing a dog to perform unnatural sex acts not be considered rape?

don't let your own personal hangups prevent you from calling a spade a spade.

The answer is simple.

A dog will hump anything that can't walk away.

That's how.

You never answered my question about my sister's dog humping my arm while licking my fingers (oh I forgot about that part. At least he was making out with me, not just an insensitive stick and leave LOL) - was he raping me or was I raping him? Or was I a bad person because I was creeped out and made him get off of me?

I also used to have an uncle that had a really REALLY old little dog named Skippy who used to love to hump peoples' legs and my aunt and uncle used to let him do it because in their minds that poor old, blind dog wasn't getting pleasure any other way.... LMFAO so THEY LET HIM DO IT.

Was the dog raping them or were they raping the dog?

This entire discussion is RIDICULOUS to the nth degree.
 
humping a woman's leg and blowing a load in her is a tad bit different, dont you think?

and this dog was being forced to perform in front of the camera and, most importantly, for the pleasure of those making it do it.
 
GoldenDelicious said:
as beyond disgusting as this is, i dont see that people should be sent to jail for it


yes they should. Dogs are almost like children. They were being taken advantage of even though I"m sure the tapes show a very willing and anxious dog trying to get his nut off. It's sick. These dogs are dependant on humans to live so you can basically train them to do anything. That's not "informed" consent. If dogs were sentient creatures that could communicate with us like we communicate with each other.........well............different story. Than a dog could make the informed decision if he really wants to cross that line and have sex with a gross old woman. As a dog..........given the choice.............you'd probably take that hot piece of bichon friese across the street that keeps prancing around with her butt stuck up in the air just waitin for it........:evil:
 
BIKINIMOM said:
The answer is simple.

A dog will hump anything that can't walk away.

That's how.

You never answered my question about my sister's dog humping my arm while licking my fingers (oh I forgot about that part. At least he was making out with me, not just an insensitive stick and leave LOL) - was he raping me or was I raping him? Or was I a bad person because I was creeped out and made him get off of me?

I also used to have an uncle that had a really REALLY old little dog named Skippy who used to love to hump peoples' legs and my aunt and uncle used to let him do it because in their minds that poor old, blind dog wasn't getting pleasure any other way.... LMFAO so THEY LET HIM DO IT.

Was the dog raping them or were they raping the dog?

This entire discussion is RIDICULOUS to the nth degree.

So why do you keep posting????


For real though, does this give new meaning to "man's best friend"???
 
GoldenDelicious said:
as beyond disgusting as this is, i dont see that people should be sent to jail for it

Well right on then. They can move in next to you. Maybe teach at the school where you send your kids.
 
GoldenDelicious said:
does the cow that you kill to eat consent to its own killing

if not, does that then not make you a murderer?

are you seriously equating eating a hamburger with sodomizing cat?
 
If we make it legal you okay with 'dog sex parties' and 'dog sex contraptions' at petco? You wanna see DVDs on late-nite TV preaching the wonder of animal sex? Banners of dogs humping women and women blowing donkeys? You want junior to see that while surfing?

Does anyone ever think these things through besides what their menial little internet brains think of in their own limited worlds?

r
 
  • Like
Reactions: pin
p0ink said:
are you seriously equating eating a hamburger with sodomizing cat?
actually, you are.

pin said:
You're a moron.
last name head, i presume

i love the way rules change when people talk about sex. taking dogs out pig hunting and having them butchered by wild boars while they drag it down is "sport" and therefore ok.

so its alright to subject an animal to lots of pointless pain and suffering, but its not alright to have sex with that animal, if it clearly likes it

you know what? i think that it counts as abuse if you take a dog walking without putting clothes on it, because youre forcing the dog to walk in public, naked.

:rolleyes:
 
GoldenDelicious said:
actually, you are.

last name head, i presume

i love the way rules change when people talk about sex. taking dogs out pig hunting and having them butchered by wild boars while they drag it down is "sport" and therefore ok.

so its alright to subject an animal to lots of pointless pain and suffering, but its not alright to have sex with that animal, if it clearly likes it

you know what? i think that it counts as abuse if you take a dog walking without putting clothes on it, because youre forcing the dog to walk in public, naked.

:rolleyes:

you sir have won this argument. GD you've clearly checkmated pin.

will pin concede?

don't count on it. :evil:
 
People train animals to do all kinds of shit that the animals don't enjoy doing. Go to any Circus, Zoo, Feedlot, Race Track or PetShop and you will see hundreds of animals experiencing more pain and suffering than the dogs humping that lady every did. The REAL problem is this nasty lady crossing fluids with animals. It should be punishable by jail time for humans to bump uglies with animals. There are a lot of animal diseases that can get passed over to the right human recipient, and then mutate and learn how to attack all of us... We could be talking about the next Aids here. It just takes that one human to be receptive to that one virus that animal is carrying and we are all in trouble then.
 
GoldenDelicious said:
actually, you are.

last name head, i presume

i love the way rules change when people talk about sex. taking dogs out pig hunting and having them butchered by wild boars while they drag it down is "sport" and therefore ok.

so its alright to subject an animal to lots of pointless pain and suffering, but its not alright to have sex with that animal, if it clearly likes it

you know what? i think that it counts as abuse if you take a dog walking without putting clothes on it, because youre forcing the dog to walk in public, naked.

:rolleyes:

LMFAO... and the jail sentence should be trebled if somebody took a pic or got that on video. Shit, imagine what the penalty should be if that dog was actually on a leash! Oh the humiliation of it all... being led around on a leash, on all fours, NAKED .... IN PUBLIC, caught on video shown all over the world for the pleasure and enjoyment of humans!!!

Oh the inhumanity of it all!!! :lmao:
 
Big Rick Rock said:
People train animals to do all kinds of shit that the animals don't enjoy doing. Go to any Circus, Zoo, Feedlot, Race Track or PetShop and you will see hundreds of animals experiencing more pain and suffering than the dogs humping that lady every did. The REAL problem is this nasty lady crossing fluids with animals. It should be punishable by jail time for humans to bump uglies with animals. There are a lot of animal diseases that can get passed over to the right human recipient, and then mutate and learn how to attack all of us... We could be talking about the next Aids here. It just takes that one human to be receptive to that one virus that animal is carrying and we are all in trouble then.

Interesting... the idea of regulating sexual behaviors in the name of keeping diseases in check.

You know, there are some sexual practices that take place even now that are already spreading the current AIDS (not the "next" one). And no, I'm not pointing fingers and flinging shit -- its simple data furnished by the CDC.

Should these regulations apply to this situation as well?
 
adds new meaning to the phrase "doing it doggy style". :FRlol:


























FIFTY SIX posts and nobody mentioned this? i cannot believe it... :rolleyes:
 
GoldenDelicious said:
actually, you are.

last name head, i presume

i love the way rules change when people talk about sex. taking dogs out pig hunting and having them butchered by wild boars while they drag it down is "sport" and therefore ok.

so its alright to subject an animal to lots of pointless pain and suffering, but its not alright to have sex with that animal, if it clearly likes it

you know what? i think that it counts as abuse if you take a dog walking without putting clothes on it, because youre forcing the dog to walk in public, naked.

:rolleyes:

I'm not talking about animal abuse here you tool emporium. We are talking about letting twisted people do whatever they want among us.

If I see someone mistreating a dog, I may not like it but its not my dog so I don't interfere. But someone who has sex with a dog has psycological issues. So you think it should be ok for people to sleep with animals? Catching diseases from them and then injecting them into the human population?

If I saw my neighbor plugging a goat, you could bet your last dime I'd turn him in. I don't want that fool around where I'm going to be raising my kids.

How come you never responded to my first comment? How about you get yourself a dog boning roommate, or babysitter? Its all good right? Nothing wrong with it right? Say your hiring someone for a job. You look at the section on their app where they list "activities. hobbies, interests, etc." and it says "enjoy animal porn". Would you hire them?
 
disturbing...

Now a mermaid... I'd consider. ;-P

Whiskey
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
cross species dating is fun and exciting?

Still smells like cat food.

Can't hide from evolution. Gonna happen somehow... to bad it's the degenerates that usually make up our future.......

If any of that made sense, please explain it to me.

Whiskey
 
Whiskey said:
Can't hide from evolution. Gonna happen somehow... to bad it's the degenerates that usually make up our future.......

If any of that made sense, please explain it to me.

Whiskey

It is simple. In the old days we had natural selection of humans and animals. This is a fact, not my opinion.

The strongest survived and made the species strong since the weak were eliminated and only the strong remained. People that couldn't keep up were left behind, people that couldn't cope didn't and wondered away.

Animals that were weak were unable to survive and their peers either left them behind or ate them, afterall why waste good meat.

Birds that were weak or not perfect were pushed out of the nest.

So that was then. We were a number of strong people with strong animals to use to work for us and to eat.

Now we have people trying to push whales back into the ocean when they intentionally beach themselves to die we have people taking little birdies that "fall" out of their nests to the local bird snactuary where they will die anyway.
Then we have all the other people that spend their lives dealing with the outcasts of stupid people that allow their animals to breed to over populate and then are not wanted. There are those that spend their life dealing with this situation ignoring their job in the world to take care of people.

So this leaves us in a siutuation where our priorities are so screwed up we have people starving and animals living in a heated house or having a nice binky over them in a little warm place.

I am sure all the homeless human beings would be happy for just a fraction of this attention.

Bottom line is we have our priorities a bit clouded.

So our future is degenerated already.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
So this leaves us in a siutuation where our priorities are so screwed up we have people starving and animals living in a heated house or having a nice binky over them in a little warm place.

I am sure all the homeless human beings would be happy for just a fraction of this attention.

Bottom line is we have our priorities a bit clouded.

So our future is degenerated already.

I see your point. My Boxers are spoiled, but they are also good guard dogs. People have been using animals to our advantage for thousands of years. But that doesn't make it OK to bang 'em.
 
pin said:
I see your point. My Boxers are spoiled, but they are also good guard dogs. People have been using animals to our advantage for thousands of years. But that doesn't make it OK to bang 'em.

All my dogs were well taken care of. "Spoiling" a dog is not good for a dog or its owner. They are dogs and I loved em although they were there for protection and for my use.

A dog will have sex with a goat, so your previous posts are very silly. I lived on farms in Russia and there were three dogs in a village that tried to mount and actually did other smaller animals. Sex for animals are not like sex with humans. That is why you have mules and jackasses, just like in humankind. Get the pun?

If you have to make a choice of your children or your pets there is never a choice.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
All my dogs were well taken care of. "Spoiling" a dog is not good for a dog or its owner. They are dogs and I loved em although they were there for protection and for my use.

A dog will have sex with a goat, so your previous posts are very silly. I lived on farms in Russia and there were three dogs in a village that tried to mount and actually did other smaller animals. Sex for animals are not like sex with humans. That is why you have mules and jackasses, just like in humankind. Get the pun?

If you have to make a choice of your children or your pets there is never a choice.

Ya, you've lost me.Threre is a big difference between a dog humping a goat and a person humping a goat. Are you trying to draw an analogy between the two or something?
 
pin said:
Ya, you've lost me.Threre is a big difference between a dog humping a goat and a person humping a goat. Are you trying to draw an analogy between the two or something?

No! Follow the bouncing ball....
 
mrplunkey said:
Interesting... the idea of regulating sexual behaviors in the name of keeping diseases in check.

You know, there are some sexual practices that take place even now that are already spreading the current AIDS (not the "next" one). And no, I'm not pointing fingers and flinging shit -- its simple data furnished by the CDC.

Should these regulations apply to this situation as well?


Thats a good point you are bringing up. Very good observation.


In a perfect world, we would require people to wear condoms with their casual partners and only have unprotected sex when they are both tested and on birth control OR agree to have a child... This would minimize the spread of diseases by people who:
1- Don't know they have them.
OR
2-Don't care they have them.

Laws like this could also put a cap on the number of unwanted pregnancies from people who:
1-Didn't want to have kids.
OR
2-Were made to father/mother a child by the other party who did want one...

But, in a perfect world we are NOT living. In a world where we regulated people's lives like this, is NOT a world I would want to live in, or many of you for that matter... So while your observation is a good one. I don't think we could ever, or would ever want to regulate human sexual activities to such that level...
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
No! Follow the bouncing ball....

Ooooohh, you guys are arguing over the technical point of "who was doing the raping". And I'm just arguing that the people are twisted and should be dragged down a gravel road.

My bad.
 
pin said:
Ooooohh, you guys are arguing over the technical point of "who was doing the raping". And I'm just arguing that the people are twisted and should be dragged down a gravel road.

My bad.

First off read your flerging k message. I am just agreeing with part of what you say, the other part is really off the wall, like there was never a wall, wayyyy off.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
First off read your flerging k message. I am just agreeing with part of what you say, the other part is really off the wall, like there was never a wall, wayyyy off.

Totally!
 
SaladFork said:
Damn that is sick... I feel wierd with my dog in the same room as me while i'm having sechs, I can feel him watching me.
ta0ub5.jpg
blue heeler
 
Whiskey said:
Can't hide from evolution. Gonna happen somehow... to bad it's the degenerates that usually make up our future.......

If any of that made sense, please explain it to me.

Whiskey
"Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying ... demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism ... [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant ... We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all."

Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on "The Cruelty of Charity," pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.
 
"The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."

Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do. The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, Gothic Press, pages 172 and 174.
 
Eugenics is a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention.
Throughout history, eugenics has been regarded by its various advocates as a social responsibility, an altruistic stance of a society, meant to create healthier and more intelligent people, to save resources, and lessen human suffering.
 
Spartacus said:
"Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying ... demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism ... [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant ... We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all."

Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on "The Cruelty of Charity," pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.
2jfwyh3.jpg
 
Spartacus said:
Spartacus said:
Eugenics is a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention.
Throughout history, eugenics has been regarded by its various advocates as a social responsibility, an altruistic stance of a society, meant to create healthier and more intelligent people, to save resources, and lessen human suffering.
seems to have worked
 
Spartacus said:
seems to have worked

Why would you want one of those Arian chickas when you could have some American luvins?

Check this hottie out!

Fat%20thonged%20girl.jpg
 
Top Bottom