Iranian Pres. "No Homosexuals in Iran"....

[jh1]

my father's first cousin was one of the last hostage to be let out during the iranian hostage crisis in the '80s.
He works in manhattan now, and still does embassador work.

he's not pleased about the iranian president being here.

Some of those hostages swear that Ahmadinajad was one of their 'hands on' captors...

 

[Longhorn85]

well no.........because women there don't put out until they're married. Clandestine homo behavior is rampant there.............apparently in the militaries it's "REAL" big...........like if you fuck up, you get put in your place by your superior officer. And here's the kicker..........if you get hard while you're getting it in the ass.........YOUR the fag.............but if you stay soft it's ok.

I'll try to remember the name of the book i read that in...........it was about afghanistan. But my army buddy told me he saw some "realy" questionable activity between school children.............he was told to just look away and shut the fuck up about it. But he'd hear stuff here and there during his tours and pretty much confirmed that men can go almost all their lives without EVER having sex with a woman because they didn't have families that were respectable. Then you hear stories about muslim men emigrating to western europe and going crazy over scantily clad dutch women and raping them..............kind of adds up.

This post is nothing but hearsay, unsubstatianed rumors, and not even about Iran.

So you have now come to the general conclusion that muslim men don't get laid except forcibly by men, and rape western women given the opportunity.

 

[redsamurai]

If you think it was a good idea to allow Ahmadinajad to speak then you should give credit where credit is due. You don't think Bush could have stopped him from entering the country or speaking?

You are too quick to turn to Bush-bashing.

I think Bush's stance that this nut shouldn't be allowed to have nukes has been validated.

I'm sure bush would have ordered his plane blown out of the sky if he could've gotten away with it. Disallowing ahmad to speak would make the White House look petty and trite..........make them look weak, like this guy speaking in the U.S would undermine them some how. But I am glad they blocked his little stunt visit to ground zero. Other than that, he should talk anywhere he pleases..........the administration should pay him no mind.

 

[gjohnson5]

LOL at this interpretation of my words.
I'm bashing Bush's foreign policy. If his moves were so carefully thought out and competent , then why hasn't Condeleza Rice started the dialog?? He had to come here and have dialog with the President of Columbia University who is not a politician at all and not part of the Bush Administration...

I'm still bashing Bush because liberals obviously has to do his job for him

If you think it was a good idea to allow Ahmadinajad to speak then you should give credit where credit is due. You don't think Bush could have stopped him from entering the country or speaking?

You are too quick to turn to Bush-bashing.

I think Bush's stance that this nut shouldn't be allowed to have nukes has been validated.

 

[-SD-]

So have the students stormed the stage in an intelligent gesture of free speech? Like they did with the minutemen that came to have intelligent discourse about the borders? Surely this head of a known terrorist state deserves to have the stage stormed in a dramatic righteous challenge from the noble students. Me thinks that wont happen and he wont be challenged in the way that he should be due to the frothing anti bush crowd at columbia.

 

[Longhorn85]

I'm still bashing Bush

I know that, and that is what I said. So I did't misinterpret your words at all G.

 

[redsamurai]

This post is nothing but hearsay, unsubstatianed rumors, and not even about Iran.

So you have now come to the general conclusion that muslim men don't get laid except forcibly by men, and rape western women given the opportunity.

you're right, it is complete hearsay. It's something that will never be written about in any news media outlets. I just found it funny that people in the middle east mock the U.S for supposedly "glorifiying" homosexual behavior when we just in fact let people excercise their god given right to sleep with whom they choose. Yet in the middle east it seems that homosexual behavior is tacitly allowed unless you enjoy it.

 

[hanselthecaretaker]

rofl....he is truly insane....said "holocaust doesnt exist--would like more proof"" I cant comprehend how someone can be so uneducated and lead a country.

It's not that he is uneducated. Everyone under the sun has heard/read/seen the holocaust. It's just that the official story and events are based mostly on emotional shock value and don't hold much weight in the way of science/logic.

 

[Longhorn85]

So know perhaps the G/L lobby will align with the Republicans in the fight vs Islamofacism?

 

[princesa]

I thought that having him here was a good idea... in order to have a better understanding of the situation we needed to hear where he stands (what his views are) instead of just listening to our government (the same one that lied about weapons of mass destruction). Our government is using many claims against Iran to deflect the failed war against Iraq (correction: our fight for Oil). I certainly dont like the guy who supports terrorism, stands against womens rights, homosexuality, religion etc..but why are our leaders so fast to point them out and squash their mistakes when homosexual marriages are not leagal in most states in U.S and we never really had a women president, we actually funded taliban when russia wanted to invade Afghan and supplied Sadam i mean can it get any worse then that ohh wait yes our soldiers are dying...for what??? Because we dont have control of the Oil in the middle east and we wont leave until we get what we want, thats us and we are bullies and no one like bullies so do you blame the Iranian President to threaten to bomb us?? ...i just think its a bit hypocritical....This is like a teenage argument between two presidents when they can just sit down and discuss things in an intelligent manner (keep your friends close and enemies closer right).

Btw I have to say that im a bit disgusted/embarrased/ashamed by Lee Bollingers speech, what a terrible and a disrespectful way to welcome someone. We are americans with class and should handle ourselves with such manner no matter who we are speaking to.

thanx for all your inputs