Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Indefatigable Homosexuals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spartacus
  • Start date Start date
Spartacus said:
alright then how about

"most people dig their own grave with a fork"
or, as in ike turner's case, a snort?
 
tanka said:
AAP said:
I think the most frustrating thing for you is that homosexuals actually do have sex.
QUOTE]
aap I find it difficult to understand why this cut and paste job from the Peter and Paul Ministries web site eleven months ago can rattle your cage so much.You need to chill out bro.It really is unimportant.Its only sex bro.Homosexual sex.And i know its all equally vallid.BUT 15 PER CENT .Call me old fashioned.LMFAO........................
Peter and Paul Ministries Homosexual Myths

Table 5. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) conducted
a study in 1987 about homosexual sex practices and found the following:
98% report anal sexual relations.
92% report oral/anal sexual activity.
78% report participating in group sex.
73% of adult male homosexuals have had sex with boys age 19 or younger.
42% report "fisting" where the hand or arm is inserted into the rectum of their partner.
37% report sadomasochism.
32% report bondage.
29% report urinating on or in their partners.
17% report eating and/or rubbing themselves with the feces of their partners.
15% report sex with animals.
12% report giving or receiving of enemas for sexual pleasure.
You couldnt make it up .

The survey doesn't seem valid. How can 98% of gays report anal sexual relations yet only 92% report anal/oral sexual activity? The number of anal/oral participants shouldn't fall under 98% as they have been included in the original 98% categorized by the first statistic. The survey suffers from poor sampling, unintelligible questioning, or is a fabrication.
 
Jacob Creutzfeldt said:
The survey doesn't seem valid. How can 98% of gays report anal sexual relations yet only 92% report anal/oral sexual activity? The number of anal/oral participants shouldn't fall under 98% as they have been included in the original 98% categorized by the first statistic. The survey suffers from poor sampling, unintelligible questioning, or is a fabrication.
you forgot the chloroformed 6%
 
Chloroform was developed in the mid-1800s and was mainly used as an anesthetic. Inhaling chloroform vapors depressed the central nervous system of a patient, causing dizziness, fatigue and unconsciousness, allowing a doctor or barber to perform simple surgery or other painful operations
 
Spartacus said:
Chloroform was developed in the mid-1800s and was mainly used as an anesthetic. Inhaling chloroform vapors depressed the central nervous system of a patient, causing dizziness, fatigue and unconsciousness, allowing a doctor or barber to perform simple surgery or other painful operations

Barber huh? I've never had a haircut so painful it required anesthesia. Either the scope of a barber's practice has changed since the mid-1800's or I've been lucky.
 
Jacob Creutzfeldt said:
The survey doesn't seem valid. How can 98% of gays report anal sexual relations yet only 92% report anal/oral sexual activity? The number of anal/oral participants shouldn't fall under 98% as they have been included in the original 98% categorized by the first statistic. The survey suffers from poor sampling, unintelligible questioning, or is a fabrication.


Dude, tanka is just a fuckup that makes up bullshit out thin air. Those stats are not accurate by any means. tanka is just an asshat tard that wont' even show his face around here anymore after getting busted this bad.
 
samoth said:
Tanka, I mean this in the nicest way possible: shut up.

Your logic is beyond flawed.
Referencing a Geocities link is beyond ignorant.
Your prejudice and bigotry are beyond irrational.
Your lack of grammar and the ability to use paragraphs are beyond fucking annoying.

Do us all a favor and unplug your computer and work through this book before posting again:

1933405384.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg


TYIA


:cow:
TITCR :artist:
 
Spartacus said:
Chloroform was developed in the mid-1800s and was mainly used as an anesthetic. Inhaling chloroform vapors depressed the central nervous system of a patient, causing dizziness, fatigue and unconsciousness, allowing a doctor or barber to perform simple surgery or other painful operations

I've always wanted to try chloroform. I don't think it's carcinogenic like sweet, sweet benzene. That, and trichlorotrifluoroethane. WTF @ making that illegal. Fucking government. Not that I wanted the latter to ingest or anything, mind you. Wait, what's this thread about again?



:cow:
 
Spartacus said:
embalming chemicals won't get you high
just an FYI
that's myth

I've heard that one. I don't know how they ever transposed embalming fluid with PCP. Have any junkies ever tried breaking in your place and stealing any of that stuff? I remember there being some really nasty stuff in embalming fluid that can wreak havoc with the human organism.



:cow:
 
Top Bottom