Bikini Mod
New member
She would have been better off stating that her life experiences would bring something extra to the table instead of saying outright that she would come to better conclusions. In some cases she's probalby 100% correct in her assessment. If she understands a particular case better from a "rational" and "pragmatic" understanding of a situation, than yes it's a + for her. However, if she allows her emotions of emotional experience to influence her judging........than this is bad. I don't think she stated that correctly.........and frankly, to be a supreme court nominee, she has to better than that. I don't think she's going to make it because of that statement, and honestly it's fair. All nominees go through the same poring over of ever word they've ever uttered. These people couldn't fart in a closet when they were 20 and not have it on recored somewhere. They go through the same scrutinies as a president.
And I am getting tired of all white males getting lumped into the good ole boy category. Some of these minorities need to understand that if it weren't for certain white males, they either wouldn't be here period..........or they'd still be calling a white man with a bullwhip around his waist "massa". It was "certain" white men that fought that. Yes, there is a good ole boy network of old sackless faggots that need to be run out of town all feathered up and tarred.
Personally I think the entitlement that get's bred into white men by wealth AND christianity is what has corrupted them. Like they're the crusaders of the world and have to save everyone by telling em what to do.
^^ Fair arguement.