If Romney gets the nod

[Headholio]

uh huh, that is why obumbles is already on the defensive with rommney, and why is gathering a record billion dollar war chest to fight a seemingly losing battle.
you are and your movement are on the ropes baghdad bob, the end is near and you realize this.

Baghdad Bob? That's not very nice. Jeez Bino I thought we were buds!

 

[AFeedz]

As for the OP, I agree, the Repubs have no good candidates

This just in: Nobody has a good candidate.

 

[Strongbow]

This just in: Nobody has a good candidate.

I have a good candidate

 

[youpissmeoff]

My wife says vote for Newt, ha has the biggest cock.

Is that why she kept calling me Newt the other night?

 

[Strongbow]

Is that why she kept calling me Newt the other night?

Maybe, she just likes huge cawcks, thou.

 

[binö]

I'm not saying the push for ID's to vote is unreasonable, I'm just telling you what the motivation is. It's not voter fraud, which is a non-problem. the motivation is suppression of votes from minorities young people, and the poor.

Fast tracking citizenship? Sounds like another fib Faux News has been telling you. You really think so? Rules haven't changed, nor will they before the election.

Perma majority for dems? Nah, it all goes in cycles. See, what will happen is that if dems stay in power long enough, the middle class will become better off. Poor people will become middle class, and the country as a whole will be healthier. But when people are better off, they will take that attitude like they somehow are special and become republicans

so if the motivation was PC in your clouded eyes (i.e initiated by dem moral overlords), then it would be alright to demand IDs for voters...but since the motivation is deemed racist in your eyes (i.e initiated by cross burning dixie screaming gop slave owners), it is best to allow voters to vote without proper ID?
trying to understand your logic is tiresome...and voter fraud isn't a problem for you, because you benefit from it, so it doesn't suprize me that it is a non-problem in your view.

 

[Headholio]

so if the motivation was PC in your clouded eyes (i.e initiated by dem moral overlords), then it would be alright to demand IDs for voters...but since the motivation is deemed racist in your eyes (i.e initiated by cross burning dixie screaming gop slave owners), it is best to allow voters to vote without proper ID?
trying to understand your logic is tiresome...and voter fraud isn't a problem for you, because you benefit from it, so it doesn't suprize me that it is a non-problem in your view.

No no no, you brought up voter fraud. I'm just saying its Faux news propaganda. For all practical purposes, voter fraud doesn't exist. You implied that Obama won because of voter fraud. No evidence to suggest that. Simply not true. Yet Faux played stories about Acorn and hords of illegal aliens messing with elections to get you scared and twist the truth right out of your mind.
Anyway, I never said if I approved of ID requirements for voting or not.
Frankly, even though most libs fight it (due to the evil intentions behind it), I think its not that big of a deal and hard to argue against.

Republicans are doing much more evil things than requiring ID's. Like sending out false information about polling places and voting days, fighting efforts to insure accuracy of voting machines, intimidating voters by informing them that the sherriff is reviewing new voter registrations, or lying to college kids and saying they can't register if they are claimed as dependents etc. Even on this forum, righties say that poor people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

GOP, SUPPRESS THE VOTE - CNN iReport

 

[binö]

No no no, you brought up voter fraud. I'm just saying its Faux news propaganda. For all practical purposes, voter fraud doesn't exist. You implied that Obama won because of voter fraud. No evidence to suggest that. Simply not true. Yet Faux played stories about Acorn and hords of illegal aliens messing with elections to get you scared and twist the truth right out of your mind.
Anyway, I never said if I approved of ID requirements for voting or not.
Frankly, even though most libs fight it (due to the evil intentions behind it), I think its not that big of a deal and hard to argue against.

Republicans are doing much more evil things than requiring ID's. Like sending out false information about polling places and voting days, fighting efforts to insure accuracy of voting machines, intimidating voters by informing them that the sherriff is reviewing new voter registrations, or lying to college kids and saying they can't register if they are claimed as dependents etc. Even on this forum, righties say that poor people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

GOP, SUPPRESS THE VOTE - CNN iReport

lol at evil intentions, what is evil about abiding by voting laws like being a legit citizen who is alive???
it's only evil because it stops fraud votes for the left.
i am opposed to any sort of legit voter fraud, and not based on any political party...according to your article (don't really credit cnn much esp. when their story features a facist party poster...pretty much erases any doubt of non-partisanness) to your article some local gop morons thwarted some voters, which is shady for sure...although you brush off dem voter fraud practices (acorn, fake sigs in indiana, illegals voting, manipulating poor folks to vote via lure of money) they are just as shady and should invite just as much scorn as the gop examples do.
i expect the next election to be rife with politcal shannigans, largely from illegal voters and chicago style voting practices...pretty clear to me the left will stop at nothing to secure obama's throne

 

[mrplunkey]

I'm not saying the push for ID's to vote is unreasonable, I'm just telling you what the motivation is. It's not voter fraud, which is a non-problem. the motivation is suppression of votes from minorities young people, and the poor.

Exactly!

Just like the pro-choice movement's true motivation is to entice minority women to abort their unborn children in an effort to suppress genes the movement considers inferior.

It's fun arbitrarily attaching motives to movements.

 

[mrplunkey]

No no no, you brought up voter fraud. I'm just saying its Faux news propaganda. For all practical purposes, voter fraud doesn't exist. You implied that Obama won because of voter fraud. No evidence to suggest that. Simply not true. Yet Faux played stories about Acorn and hords of illegal aliens messing with elections to get you scared and twist the truth right out of your mind.
Anyway, I never said if I approved of ID requirements for voting or not.
Frankly, even though most libs fight it (due to the evil intentions behind it), I think its not that big of a deal and hard to argue against.

Republicans are doing much more evil things than requiring ID's. Like sending out false information about polling places and voting days, fighting efforts to insure accuracy of voting machines, intimidating voters by informing them that the sherriff is reviewing new voter registrations, or lying to college kids and saying they can't register if they are claimed as dependents etc. Even on this forum, righties say that poor people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

GOP, SUPPRESS THE VOTE - CNN iReport

ACORN has already plead guilty to voter registration fraud.

Name a modern-day, nationally-recognized republican organization that has been convicted or plead guilty of voter fraud.