Imnotdutch
butler monkey
spatts said:Sidenote: If more myonuclei means more androgenic receptors, then wouldn't it take more androgen to get the same results since it's being spread over a wider number of receptors? I'm thinking of it like 1 cup of water and 5 little bowls. You fill those bowls all the way up with that 1 cup of water. If you then take 1 cup of water and 10 little bowls, it would take more water to fill those 10 little cups to the same height as the previous 5. That may have made no sense at all...but I'm curious. Thoughts?
Not necessarily. You would be right if the number of receptor molecules rivalled the number of molecules of agonist and the binding constant was very low. However this is generally untrue. If this situation were to occur then having a co-operative binding curve (most receptors do) would be totally pointless.......
Last edited: