Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Hot Dog Fucking, Coming to a Military Base Near You!

TableFun

Banned
Democrats to Legalize Military Dog Fucking


Congratulations, America: you've gotten what you wished for. You elected Barack "Hussein" Obama as commander in chief. He quickly allowed homosexuals to serve as proud members of the US Armed Forces, standing buttock-to-buttock in foxholes next to normal young American boys. (After the war is over, they can marry, now.) It was only a matter of time before our fighting men were encouraged to start fucking dogs.

You see, in order to allow the gays to infiltrate our Army legally, the US Code of Military Justice is being modified. Congress is going to vote to delete a section about what kind of hot sex is and isn't allowed in the hot, hot heat of battle. But what else is being deleted in the process?

In fact, Congress is poised to remove from the books the only specific reference to bestiality contained in the UCMJ. The obscure deletion, contained in the massive Defense Appropriations bill now being finalized, raised the ire of some conservative groups still outraged over the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" law that allowed homosexuals to serve openly in the military.

And this is allegedly a "technicality?" How convenient, for liberal congressmen, to accidentally legalize hot dog fucking by our lust-crazed boys in uniform. Let's just see what the Family Research Council has to say about this, eh?

This is the slippery slope that FRC warned of. For three long years, President Obama has worked to draft the military into his radical social agenda. Obviously, the administration understands that once it breaks down the values and inhibitions of our Defense Department, society will be easier to wear down. Here, the unintended consequence of that push opens the door to an act so vile it's embarrassing to mention—let alone tolerate. When FRC made the discovery, we sought confirmation from former and current military attorneys. One of those sources, a law professor and former judge advocate, replied that yes, by eliminating Article 125, the Senate would be creating a legal argument for bestiality. This may not have been deliberate, but it's certainly conceivable from leaders who pay so little attention to the consequences of their extreme social agenda.

Once you elect a black Muslim as president, you are mos definitely on a slippery slope. That slippery slope ends in legalized military dog fucking. Do not say that the Republican party did not warn you.

Gingrich/ Bachmann 2012.

Democrats to Legalize Military Dog Fucking



LMFAO :qt:
 
doggystyle1.jpg
 
Democrats to Legalize Military Dog Fucking


Congratulations, America: you've gotten what you wished for. You elected Barack "Hussein" Obama as commander in chief. He quickly allowed homosexuals to serve as proud members of the US Armed Forces, standing buttock-to-buttock in foxholes next to normal young American boys. (After the war is over, they can marry, now.) It was only a matter of time before our fighting men were encouraged to start fucking dogs.

You see, in order to allow the gays to infiltrate our Army legally, the US Code of Military Justice is being modified. Congress is going to vote to delete a section about what kind of hot sex is and isn't allowed in the hot, hot heat of battle. But what else is being deleted in the process?

In fact, Congress is poised to remove from the books the only specific reference to bestiality contained in the UCMJ. The obscure deletion, contained in the massive Defense Appropriations bill now being finalized, raised the ire of some conservative groups still outraged over the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" law that allowed homosexuals to serve openly in the military.

And this is allegedly a "technicality?" How convenient, for liberal congressmen, to accidentally legalize hot dog fucking by our lust-crazed boys in uniform. Let's just see what the Family Research Council has to say about this, eh?

This is the slippery slope that FRC warned of. For three long years, President Obama has worked to draft the military into his radical social agenda. Obviously, the administration understands that once it breaks down the values and inhibitions of our Defense Department, society will be easier to wear down. Here, the unintended consequence of that push opens the door to an act so vile it's embarrassing to mention—let alone tolerate. When FRC made the discovery, we sought confirmation from former and current military attorneys. One of those sources, a law professor and former judge advocate, replied that yes, by eliminating Article 125, the Senate would be creating a legal argument for bestiality. This may not have been deliberate, but it's certainly conceivable from leaders who pay so little attention to the consequences of their extreme social agenda.

Once you elect a black Muslim as president, you are mos definitely on a slippery slope. That slippery slope ends in legalized military dog fucking. Do not say that the Republican party did not warn you.

Gingrich/ Bachmann 2012.

Democrats to Legalize Military Dog Fucking



LMFAO :qt:

Makes me sick...
 
I like sheep

What's the difference between the Rolling Stones and a scottish farmer?

The Rolling Stones sang, "Hey You, Get Off of My Cloud" and scottish farmer says, "Hey McCloud, get off of my ewe."




The trouble with cows is that you have to jump out of the wheel barrow and run all the way around front to kiss 'em.



I say if they boys are going to put their life on the line protecting our liberties, let them fuck dogs. What the hell do I care.
 
What's the difference between the Rolling Stones and a scottish farmer?

The Rolling Stones sang, "Hey You, Get Off of My Cloud" and scottish farmer says, "Hey McCloud, get off of my ewe."




The trouble with cows is that you have to jump out of the wheel barrow and run all the way around front to kiss 'em.



I say if they boys are going to put their life on the line protecting our liberties, let them fuck dogs. What the hell do I care.

I agree... But making it public is too big of a distraction...
 
If being gay isn't a big deal y announce it. I don't announce I'm red sox fan... Or white or a girl or whatever... This whole thing is just a distraction... It's making it a big deal... Doesn't make sense...

It was never a distraction to the actual soldiers. When you have special forces people writing in to newspapers and magazines saying they know full well who's gay and who's not and they simply don't give a shit because these people have proven to have their backs....who are we really appeasing by kicking out homosexuals? It isn't for the soldiers. And no flamer makes it through basic...these guys are all professionals cause it was beaten into you for months on end. These soldiers never made a spectacle of their sexuality, most of em just got caught coming out of gay or somehting like that when on leave.
 
Actually, I've lived around Oceanside's Camp Pendelton off and on for about 15 years and there's definitely a lot of good rob's and robette's stationed there. I usually invite a few of the non-local's into my house everything thanksgiving and Christmas that I spend in town.
 
Actually, I've lived around Oceanside's Camp Pendelton off and on for about 15 years and there's definitely a lot of good rob's and robette's stationed there. I usually invite a few of the non-local's into my house everything thanksgiving and Christmas that I spend in town.

Thats just Oceanside.

DrOiD BioNiC EF App!
 
Top Bottom