Re: GW501516...post your experience
I'm always craving Sarmssearch
Mmm!! All this talk is making me crave sarmssearch!![]()
I'm always craving Sarmssearch
Mmm!! All this talk is making me crave sarmssearch!![]()
Just received mine a few days ago. Now waiting on unique's S-4 and Osta to come in. Can't wait to try the GW from SS.
I haven't but i am curious also. Pill form seems to be a much easier way to go. The liquid can be a PIA especially when traveling. I hope someone responds!has anyone tried the pill form of this? if so results the same?
Has anyone tried delivery to Australia? We seem to have the strictest customs laws in the world.
I've gotten SS and unique GW through 2-3 times.
There are news about the detection times of Osta and GW???
About GW...
"Anti-doping authorities [now] have a test for GW1516, which is relatively easy to find in urine with existing testing procedures, as it’s not a naturally occurring substance in the body. What’s more, clinical research shows that the drug is detectable as long as 40 days after a single dose."
Source:
cyclingtips.com.au/2013/04/the-new-epo-gw1516-aicar-and-their-use-in-cycling/
Pointless.![]()
Do you think running gw50 would be a good idea during contest prep along side aas?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using EliteFitness
So I got my Gw 501516 two days ago from Unique.. Why is it a jelly like substance? is this normal... it freaks me out.. kind of like someone splooged in the bottle and shipped it to me as a gag gift.. :|
Any problems with getting SS or unique GW into canada? Prefer SS but would settle for either. How long does it take to get up here?
All my GW has been like a cloudy liquid....maybe this has something to do with the increase in dosage? From 5mg to 20mg per mL
the GW I have from sarms search is in a clear glass bottle with no cloudiness at all.
Not dissing what you have, but it sounds like the GW you have has fallen out of suspension.
sarms search GW is clear and 20mgs per ML![]()
Same here.Yup, same here. My GW from unique is a cloudy sticky-ish liquid
Is that possible? Would that have an effect on the strength of it or even make it unusable?
Any problems with getting SS or unique GW into canada? Prefer SS but would settle for either. How long does it take to get up here?
Is that possible? Would that have an effect on the strength of it or even make it unusable?
I know SS ships to Canada.
Anyone heard positive feed back from gwp version of this? Apparently I dropped the ball by not going ss
I haven't used GWPs GW-50 but that's primarily because I wasn't impressed with their other SARMs. SS is definitely solid and Sarms1 (www.sarms1.com) has been getting rave reviews as well, so those two are safe bets
this has been discussed in detail 100 times on here, i dont think you will get much more added to it.Might want to do a searchHey guys, I've been running GW at 10mg/day for the past 2 weeks. My endurance is definitely up, I am able to keep going and going, and then take a short break, and never feel exhausted. It's awesome!
However, my main concerns lie with the PPAR delta agonism. I have read dozens of studies on the promotion of colorectal cancer growth due to the agonism. HOWEVER! the studies done with mice were genetically mutated to lack the APC gene, which in turn gives them FAP (a disorder where hundreds of colon polyps are caused to grow and has almost a 100% cancer risk).
To my understanding... the 501516 doubled the amount of already abnormal polyps due to the FAP disorder which affects about 1 in 7-22k people. Therefore, is it safe to say, that in human individuals WITHOUT the FAP disorder, should not have any issues with the minute dosages compared to the mice studies?
Also, the mice studies were run for 2 years as opposed to 2-8 week intervals. I am basically just trying to alleviated my own concerns and others'. Of course, if a person has a known hereditary disposition to FAP (it is dominant), then I would NOT even come near this drug! Because it was proven to potentiate the development of polyps.
All-in-all, GW is fantastic aside from the potential side affects; however, the side affects were so strongly displayed in the mice due to the abnormality in the genome. Somebody please correct me if any of my logic is incorrect, I just want to do the healthiest thing possible. And for those reasons, I will try to find out if my father has polyp issues and limit my runs to 2-3 weeks at a time.
best regards and appreciation
NOT TRYIGN TO BEAT A DEAD HORSE! I just havent seen these connections made previously.
Hey guys, I've been running GW at 10mg/day for the past 2 weeks. My endurance is definitely up, I am able to keep going and going, and then take a short break, and never feel exhausted. It's awesome!
However, my main concerns lie with the PPAR delta agonism. I have read dozens of studies on the promotion of colorectal cancer growth due to the agonism. HOWEVER! the studies done with mice were genetically mutated to lack the APC gene, which in turn gives them FAP (a disorder where hundreds of colon polyps are caused to grow and has almost a 100% cancer risk).
To my understanding... the 501516 doubled the amount of already abnormal polyps due to the FAP disorder which affects about 1 in 7-22k people. Therefore, is it safe to say, that in human individuals WITHOUT the FAP disorder, should not have any issues with the minute dosages compared to the mice studies?
Also, the mice studies were run for 2 years as opposed to 2-8 week intervals. I am basically just trying to alleviated my own concerns and others'. Of course, if a person has a known hereditary disposition to FAP (it is dominant), then I would NOT even come near this drug! Because it was proven to potentiate the development of polyps.
All-in-all, GW is fantastic aside from the potential side affects; however, the side affects were so strongly displayed in the mice due to the abnormality in the genome. Somebody please correct me if any of my logic is incorrect, I just want to do the healthiest thing possible. And for those reasons, I will try to find out if my father has polyp issues and limit my runs to 2-3 weeks at a time.
best regards and appreciation
NOT TRYIGN TO BEAT A DEAD HORSE! I just havent seen these connections made previously.
We appreciate your commitment, Dylan. You explained the effects and side effects of GW very well (and also the SARMs). But the big unknown factor is the point with cancer potential. For example: the tumors of mice can't be transferred to humans. But nobody knows that - neither the scientists. The point is: until there is no study that confirms that probability of cancer in mice can't be compared with humans nobody knows the real bio-chemical process in our body.seriously guys, this topic does not need to be gone over everyday does it? i spent all this time writing articles and making videos to fully educate everyone on things like this... it never fails that the same questions continuously comes up when all the information is just sitting here... its pretty frustrating...
READ AND WATCH THE VIDEO
Does anyone have a link or testimonial of someone who lost more than 30lbs on GW 501516? I can't find anything on the net.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We appreciate your commitment, Dylan. You explained the effects and side effects of GW very well (and also the SARMs). But the big unknown factor is the point with cancer potential. For example: the tumors of mice can't be transferred to humans. But nobody knows that - neither the scientists. The point is: until there is no study that confirms that probability of cancer in mice can't be compared with humans nobody knows the real bio-chemical process in our body.
The topic will be always descussed: it's the anxiety/fear of the unknown. There are a lot of products which have similary effects like GW. Not that strong and probably not that safe, but you KNOW the side effects and you can plan and react if you must.
Taking GW is like Russian Roullete: the next diagnosis can be multi organ cancer or you will live another 40 years.
I red a lot of studies and i know: the mice took 5-40mg per kg for nearly two years. But what if a human takes 5-20mg per day? What it the individual cancer risk rise uf at 17%? And what if you ARE in these 17%?
I hope there will be further studies made the next time. GW has incredible interesting effects which has enourmous potential. Until then, everybod should make his/her own deciso.
Here's the thing, you won't find it. If you have 30+ lbs to lose, this enhancement drug isn't for you. Diet/cardio is the first step. It's designed to help conditioned athletes reach above and beyond normal conditioning. An aid in getting from 10% bodyfat to 7-8% can be very beneficial. Fat loss is a secondary benefit honestly. GW increases your endurance. This is why you may not find what you're looking for...
Now, if you're already doing tedious cardio and/or weight lifting every day and puting in the effort, GW may have potential to help you. Not saying you can't lose significant weight on it because you can, but only of you're puting forth the effort. Diet and cardio are really going to dictate the end result, GW is just the icing on the cake
seriously guys, this topic does not need to be gone over everyday does it? i spent all this time writing articles and making videos to fully educate everyone on things like this... it never fails that the same questions continuously comes up when all the information is just sitting here... its pretty frustrating...
READ AND WATCH THE VIDEO
GW-510516 Part 3 - YouTube
Great video, it's a 4 part course.
GW-501516 - YouTube
GW-501516 Part 2 - YouTube
GW-510516 Part 3 - YouTube
GW-501516 Part 4 - YouTube
You're completely missing the point. The point is that you don't have to see studies if you use your brain. The dose that they used on mice is equal to a 200 lb male using something like 2000mg per day for over a year. Of course its going to give them fucking cancer.
Haha first time I heard about these MJ studiesReminds me of those old marijuana studies in the 1960's that put masks on chimpanzees and pumped MJ smoke through a tube into the mask. They had the equivalent of 60 columbian joints pumped through in 5 minutes each day for 30 days and documented all the side effects to get the conclusion that MJ was bad. What really happened was they suffocated the monkeys and blamed it on the MJ killing brain cells. LOL
Reminds me of those old marijuana studies in the 1960's that put masks on chimpanzees and pumped MJ smoke through a tube into the mask. They had the equivalent of 60 columbian joints pumped through in 5 minutes each day for 30 days and documented all the side effects to get the conclusion that MJ was bad. What really happened was they suffocated the monkeys and blamed it on the MJ killing brain cells. LOL
Reminds me of those old marijuana studies in the 1960's that put masks on chimpanzees and pumped MJ smoke through a tube into the mask. They had the equivalent of 60 columbian joints pumped through in 5 minutes each day for 30 days and documented all the side effects to get the conclusion that MJ was bad. What really happened was they suffocated the monkeys and blamed it on the MJ killing brain cells. LOL
Reminds me of those old marijuana studies in the 1960's that put masks on chimpanzees and pumped MJ smoke through a tube into the mask. They had the equivalent of 60 columbian joints pumped through in 5 minutes each day for 30 days and documented all the side effects to get the conclusion that MJ was bad. What really happened was they suffocated the monkeys and blamed it on the MJ killing brain cells. LOL
I'am a cyclist looking for some advice.
Been reading lot about GW but there are people talking of Telmisartan, they say it's cheaper and less risk. Does anyone have experience with it? Does it have the same effect as GW and where can i buy it?
I'am a cyclist looking for some advice.
Been reading lot about GW but there are people talking of Telmisartan, they say it's cheaper and less risk. Does anyone have experience with it? Does it have the same effect as GW and where can i buy it?
I'am a cyclist looking for some advice.
Been reading lot about GW but there are people talking of Telmisartan, they say it's cheaper and less risk. Does anyone have experience with it? Does it have the same effect as GW and where can i buy it?
GW is going to continue to build your VO2max and allow for such rapid increase in endurance and it will continue to show improvement as your cycle goes on... Its absolutely amazing... It has a place in every type of cycle...
Isn't gw detected for pros?
I have started with GW a few days ago. Noticeable effect on the endurance already after the first dose (5mg). I will increase the dose of 5-10mg per week for approx. 2 months. In the first half hour of the workout I feel my legs tired as if I had already done 4 hours, then this feeling ends and I can finish my workout without any feeling of fatigue. All cyclists (pros and masters) with whom I trust and who have made use of this substance, have confirmed this feeling.
The most important thing is to eat properly and thoroughly because we tend to do more than we're used to without this substance.
Isn't gw detected for pros?
It is detectable from the beginning of 2013, pros that are on ADAMs protocol now can't use GW. Other cyclist can cycle GW paying attention to the detection time. The problem is that the detection time is very variable, depending on the length of the cycle and on the daily doses. I'm going to use it only at the beginning of the season and I'll stop more than a month before the first race. We have to remember that when use banned substance, even if we do everithing carefully, there are also risks, it's a part of the game.
Yes, it is banned by WADA. Maybe Dylan can shed some light on detection times, etc? I would think you can use it to train and see drastic improvements, yet probably clear your system out and maintain a lot of gains, like many do with AAS. Ultimately it is a tool to assist your training and if you are training hard I'm sure it will be of great benefit even after you are off.
Sent from my XT1080 using EliteFitness
GW is going to continue to build your VO2max and allow for such rapid increase in endurance and it will continue to show improvement as your cycle goes on... Its absolutely amazing... It has a place in every type of cycle...
That's a good way to put it. It definitely has a place anywhere - it has so many great properties that it can be placed anywhere in any cycle. I'll definitely be putting some sarms1 GW somewhere in all of my future cycles and PCTs
gw for its use in every cycle and off cylce period for training and cardio endurance (not to mention fat loss and anti catabolic effects) and osta for its amazing abilities in pct are the 2 best products by far sold by sarms companies for me..But thats the beauty of it, we all have different opinions on it but lets all agree sarms products are amazing.
best quality sarms products are sold at sarms1.
When dosing GW (Sarms1 brand) am I correct when I take .5ml in the AM and .5ml again at night for a total of 1ml or 20mg? It just seems like such a small amount. I guess I'm used to choking down large preworkout drinks with huge scoops of powder.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
When dosing GW (Sarms1 brand) am I correct when I take .5ml in the AM and .5ml again at night for a total of 1ml or 20mg? It just seems like such a small amount. I guess I'm used to choking down large preworkout drinks with huge scoops of powder.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
I've been on Sarms 1 GW for about 5 weeks now and love it! My cardio and endurance has been through the roof plus it has helped lean me out with my diet. After hearing all the hype about Sarms I figured I would give it a run and I am impressed with the results. I will be using the triple stack on the next run for sure!
Sarms1 GW is working great here. Training is easier and fat is disolving. I have cut up before doing cardio on pwo and usually have a predictable pattern from where the fat is used... but this is different. The fat is being used simultaneously from the mid section as from chest/legs. Admittedly I am doing more cycling this time round as my source of cardio instead of just running and interval circuits... so that may be playing a role in the fat usage pattern.
Sent from my GT-N7105T using EliteFitness
I've been on Sarms 1 GW for about 5 weeks now and love it! My cardio and endurance has been through the roof plus it has helped lean me out with my diet. After hearing all the hype about Sarms I figured I would give it a run and I am impressed with the results. I will be using the triple stack on the next run for sure!
This is like some many other logs its ridiculous. Sarms1 is the best and if you havent dug into the other you will have to give them a go bro. LGD, Ostarine, S4 are all killer sarms and special in their own way. Glad it went well
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Does it make you shit more? fo real
Regarding the question about calorie burn while cycling decreasing while using GW, posted by ha1ha1, what are you using to measure this?
If you are using anything aside from a power meter, then the figure will be seriously skewed and will be under reporting the number of calories burnt while your are using GW.
The number of calories burnt while cycling in a given time period is a result of the number of watts produced over that time period. Same thing with a light bulb: a 100w light bulb that is in use for one hour uses more electricity than a 60w light bulb in use for one hour.
So if you want an accurate measure if the number of calories burnt, you have to measure power output. Power output while cycling can only be measured using a properly calibrated power meter like an SRM, powertap or the like. Outside of competitive cyclists, not many people own power meters as they are REALLY fucking expensive. An SRM, which is regarded as the gold standard in cycling power measurement will cost you about US$2500 for a base model.
Heart rate monitors, cycling computers and other devices that are used most commonly, calculate calories used by using a set of mathematical assumptions based on your heart rate and the user data that you enter into the device. These assumptions work for the average cyclist, but such approximations go out the window when you are doping or even when you are just really fit.
I did an experiment some time back when I was racing a lot: I wore a polar heart rate monitor and also ran my SRM for the same ride. The heart rate monitor grossly under reported the number of calories reported over the course of the 4 hour ride. I was pretty fit at the time I did this experiment. i had a resting heart rate of 30-35 bpm, I raced in elite and I was in the top 20 rankings for my country at that time. "Outliers" like super fit athletes or people using products like GW do not fit into the mathematical model behind the calorie calculations used by your average heart rate monitor or cycle computer. The reason for this is that when you are using or really fit, you are much more efficient. You are doing more work with less effort.
To continue with the light bulb analogy, by taking GW, you changed your cycling body from being an average joe 100w incandescent light bulb, to a more efficient 30w compact fluorescent bulb, BUT YOU PRODUCE THE SAME AMOUNT OF LIGHT!
Basically when you are using GW, you are producing XXX watts with less effort than when you when you were not using GW. Lower effort is manifest by a lower heart rate, and this tricks your heart rate monitor or cycle computer into thinking your not working as hard and therefore not burning as many calories compared with when you were not on GW.
Your heart rate monitor or cycling computer is incorrect. If you are doing the same work, you are burning the same number of calories, by definition. Chances are, because you are on GW, you are working harder, producing more power and burning more calories, but you just don't feel it and your heart rate is lower than it would be without GW.
Hope this make sense. Sorry for the long post.
Thanks for the explanation. I can see how the data would be wrong regarding power. My data is completely out at the moment as I have also given up all caffeine/pwo and stim. My heart rate is showing less and my performance has increased for high intensity work. For example with double unders I could previoisly string a maximum of 1 minute (100) together. With 4.5 weeks of GW and on the 3rd week of LG and 1 week of no pwo stims
Regarding the question about calorie burn while cycling decreasing while using GW, posted by ha1ha1, what are you using to measure this?
If you are using anything aside from a power meter, then the figure will be seriously skewed and will be under reporting the number of calories burnt while your are using GW.
The number of calories burnt while cycling in a given time period is a result of the number of watts produced over that time period. Same thing with a light bulb: a 100w light bulb that is in use for one hour uses more electricity than a 60w light bulb in use for one hour.
So if you want an accurate measure if the number of calories burnt, you have to measure power output. Power output while cycling can only be measured using a properly calibrated power meter like an SRM, powertap or the like. Outside of competitive cyclists, not many people own power meters as they are REALLY fucking expensive. An SRM, which is regarded as the gold standard in cycling power measurement will cost you about US$2500 for a base model.
Heart rate monitors, cycling computers and other devices that are used most commonly, calculate calories used by using a set of mathematical assumptions based on your heart rate and the user data that you enter into the device. These assumptions work for the average cyclist, but such approximations go out the window when you are doping or even when you are just really fit.
I did an experiment some time back when I was racing a lot: I wore a polar heart rate monitor and also ran my SRM for the same ride. The heart rate monitor grossly under reported the number of calories reported over the course of the 4 hour ride. I was pretty fit at the time I did this experiment. i had a resting heart rate of 30-35 bpm, I raced in elite and I was in the top 20 rankings for my country at that time. "Outliers" like super fit athletes or people using products like GW do not fit into the mathematical model behind the calorie calculations used by your average heart rate monitor or cycle computer. The reason for this is that when you are using or really fit, you are much more efficient. You are doing more work with less effort.
To continue with the light bulb analogy, by taking GW, you changed your cycling body from being an average joe 100w incandescent light bulb, to a more efficient 30w compact fluorescent bulb, BUT YOU PRODUCE THE SAME AMOUNT OF LIGHT!
Basically when you are using GW, you are producing XXX watts with less effort than when you when you were not using GW. Lower effort is manifest by a lower heart rate, and this tricks your heart rate monitor or cycle computer into thinking your not working as hard and therefore not burning as many calories compared with when you were not on GW.
Your heart rate monitor or cycling computer is incorrect. If you are doing the same work, you are burning the same number of calories, by definition. Chances are, because you are on GW, you are working harder, producing more power and burning more calories, but you just don't feel it and your heart rate is lower than it would be without GW.
Hope this make sense. Sorry for the long post.
Regarding the question about calorie burn while cycling decreasing while using GW, posted by ha1ha1, what are you using to measure this?
If you are using anything aside from a power meter, then the figure will be seriously skewed and will be under reporting the number of calories burnt while your are using GW.
The number of calories burnt while cycling in a given time period is a result of the number of watts produced over that time period. Same thing with a light bulb: a 100w light bulb that is in use for one hour uses more electricity than a 60w light bulb in use for one hour.
So if you want an accurate measure if the number of calories burnt, you have to measure power output. Power output while cycling can only be measured using a properly calibrated power meter like an SRM, powertap or the like. Outside of competitive cyclists, not many people own power meters as they are REALLY fucking expensive. An SRM, which is regarded as the gold standard in cycling power measurement will cost you about US$2500 for a base model.
Heart rate monitors, cycling computers and other devices that are used most commonly, calculate calories used by using a set of mathematical assumptions based on your heart rate and the user data that you enter into the device. These assumptions work for the average cyclist, but such approximations go out the window when you are doping or even when you are just really fit.
I did an experiment some time back when I was racing a lot: I wore a polar heart rate monitor and also ran my SRM for the same ride. The heart rate monitor grossly under reported the number of calories reported over the course of the 4 hour ride. I was pretty fit at the time I did this experiment. i had a resting heart rate of 30-35 bpm, I raced in elite and I was in the top 20 rankings for my country at that time. "Outliers" like super fit athletes or people using products like GW do not fit into the mathematical model behind the calorie calculations used by your average heart rate monitor or cycle computer. The reason for this is that when you are using or really fit, you are much more efficient. You are doing more work with less effort.
To continue with the light bulb analogy, by taking GW, you changed your cycling body from being an average joe 100w incandescent light bulb, to a more efficient 30w compact fluorescent bulb, BUT YOU PRODUCE THE SAME AMOUNT OF LIGHT!
Basically when you are using GW, you are producing XXX watts with less effort than when you when you were not using GW. Lower effort is manifest by a lower heart rate, and this tricks your heart rate monitor or cycle computer into thinking your not working as hard and therefore not burning as many calories compared with when you were not on GW.
Your heart rate monitor or cycling computer is incorrect. If you are doing the same work, you are burning the same number of calories, by definition. Chances are, because you are on GW, you are working harder, producing more power and burning more calories, but you just don't feel it and your heart rate is lower than it would be without GW.
Hope this make sense. Sorry for the long post.
I've been reading through a large part of this thread but I see mixed opinions.
It's a fact that GW 50 enhances cardiac abilities, and because of that you are able to prolong your cardio.
But does GW 50 promote fat loss on its own? Would you burn extra calories without the extra cardio? (yes this is a hypothetic question)
I've been reading through a large part of this thread but I see mixed opinions.
It's a fact that GW 50 enhances cardiac abilities, and because of that you are able to prolong your cardio.
But does GW 50 promote fat loss on its own? Would you burn extra calories without the extra cardio? (yes this is a hypothetic question)
It shifts your body from burning glucose as fuel, from burning your bodies own fat.
How about the nutrition during (LGD and) GW? LGD needs lot of energy, but with too much carbohydrates the GW doesn't have anymore the fat-burning effect, does it? Or should a rat prioritize the power-effect of GW instead of dropping the BF while gaining lean mass?
I will soon write about my experience with GW![]()
Could anyone who has run this comment on how endurance is after you come off? I am running a half marathon soon and have enough to last me until a week before - will I notice a significant drop in fitness when I come off the compound? Thanks.
You endurance should still be high.. remember you've worked hard to get where you at with your cardiovascular so you will still have a high level. it just wont be like youre in GW still
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










