Foreskin on a man???

[jay1]

How would you know if its bull ?
and trust me Ive learned to master my domain,
high school was another story but I could bust twice without stopping.

 

[CrazyK]

How would you know if its bull ?
and trust me Ive learned to master my domain,
high school was another story but I could bust twice without stopping.

Cause I have plenty of feeling down there, any more and it just wouldn't be cool.

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

No it's not

It's cutting skin off a baby's penis...unnecessary surgery on infants= FUCKING BARBARIC

it's a very sanitary, clean practice. I posted studies in another thread that said it was much healthier to have a circumcised penis.

Then let me tie you down and hack off 15 cubic inches of skin off your most sensitive body part, in the name of a health survey.
This topic came up before and the uncut Euro EF'ers had no health problems with their foreskins.

I have a circumcision scar, that is big, black and fucking atrocious. Don't you think I should have been the one to make the decision?

The argument that it's OK to be done, 'cause babies don't remember the pain of the procedur is ludicrous.

 

[CrazyK]

It's cutting skin off a baby's penis...unnecessary surgery on infants= FUCKING BARBARIC


Then let me tie you down and hack off 15 cubic inches of skin off your most sensitive body part, in the name of a health survey.
This topic came up before and the uncut Euro EF'ers had no health problems with their foreskins.

I have a circumcision scar, that is big, black and fucking atrocious. Don't you think I should have been the one to make the decision?

The argument that it's OK to be done, 'cause babies don't remember the pain of the procedur is ludicrous.

LOL! It is a nessacary procedure if you want to have your dingy be as healthy as it can be. Look at the John Hopkins University, and British Medical Journal studies done on the subject. Every one of them pointed that you were well better off in life being circumcised. It's not to say that because you are uncut something MUST happen to you, but you are better off being cut. Can't argue with science. It's like wearing a condom, you might fuck away your whole life and not run in to one single problem, then again you might get an std after one time not using the glove. You're just better off.

 

[Robert Jan]

LOL! It is a nessacary procedure if you want to have your dingy be as healthy as it can be. Look at the John Hopkins University, and British Medical Journal studies done on the subject. Every one of them pointed that you were well better off in life being circumcised. It's not to say that because you are uncut something MUST happen to you, but you are better off being cut. Can't argue with science. It's like wearing a condom, you might fuck away your whole life and not run in to one single problem, then again you might get an std after one time not using the glove. You're just better off.

Only by an extremely small margin

margin smaller than the number of people who get complications from the surgery. There is scientific evidence supporting both ways.

 

[Robert Jan]

I am happy to be natural.

The only argument that can be made for cutting it, realistically, is that women prefer the way it looks uncut. This is not too important IMO because when erect they look almost the same. Also some people who havent seen many or any uncut dicks think they all have oversized foreskins. like the cock is hidden in there. That's the least good looking form... Most guys the foreskin doesn't reach all the way across the head.
As far as there is any difference in feeling, having foreskin actually gives more stimulation.

Funny thing is I think girls preferance (which is BTW only really there in the USA) taking this for a reason is pathetic. The ultimate form of being PUSSYWHIPPED.... girls kinda want you to cut a piece of your DICK OFF, so you just do it....

One more thing.... Blowjobs... aren't they awesome?
An uncut man has far, far more sensation in the head of his penis. BJ's simply have to be a greater sensation to them.

Let alone the foreskin itself! it's far more sensitive than just any piece of skin. It feels great during sex. feels good to touch it. stroking it provokes an erection. It's PART OF THE DICK not just a cover for the head.

 

[SC4EVA]

I am happy to be natural.

The only argument that can be made for cutting it, realistically, is that women prefer the way it looks uncut. This is not too important IMO because when erect they look almost the same. Also some people who havent seen many or any uncut dicks think they all have oversized foreskins. like the cock is hidden in there. That's the least good looking form... Most guys the foreskin doesn't reach all the way across the head.
As far as there is any difference in feeling, having foreskin actually gives more stimulation.

Funny thing is I think girls preferance (which is BTW only really there in the USA) taking this for a reason is pathetic. The ultimate form of being PUSSYWHIPPED.... girls kinda want you to cut a piece of your DICK OFF, so you just do it....

One more thing.... Blowjobs... aren't they awesome?
An uncut man has far, far more sensation in the head of his penis. BJ's simply have to be a greater sensation to them.

Let alone the foreskin itself! it's far more sensitive than just any piece of skin. It feels great during sex. feels good to touch it. stroking it provokes an erection. It's PART OF THE DICK not just a cover for the head.

Although the skin is back when erect it can still go up and down - I have a lot of skin so I can go whatever way

 

[CrazyK]

Only by an extremely small margin

margin smaller than the number of people who get complications from the surgery. There is scientific evidence supporting both ways.

That is NOT true. Look at the studies I posted in the other circumcision thread by ElvisP. All said that you are considerably more at risk for many diseases. You on the other hand, haven't posted anything or any studies. BTW, if you do find one, please make it be from an accredited University, and not "WE LOVE UNCUT COCKS.COM", thank you.

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

That is NOT true. Look at the studies I posted in the other circumcision thread by ElvisP. All said that you are considerably more at risk for many diseases. You on the other hand, haven't posted anything or any studies. BTW, if you do find one, please make it be from an accredited University, and not "WE LOVE UNCUT COCKS.COM", thank you.

He doesn't need studies about uncut peni, he's the owner of one. If he's had no problems, then I'd say that his position is very justified.

 

[CrazyK]

He doesn't need studies about uncut peni, he's the owner of one. If he's had no problems, then I'd say that his position is very justified.

Yeah, I've fucked 50000000 women with out a condom. I've never had a problem, guess everyone should do as me also?


Arguing with science will yield diminishing returns ulcasterdropout.