Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

EQ only cycle

eq only is kind of wasting your time IMO but if thats all you're going to do you don't need anything else with it. It does not aromatise or convert to dht or give very good gains for that matter
 
1-16 prop 75-100/day
1-15 EQ 600/week
GH for sure but need suggestion on that doseage i want
adex everyday or?
and jello packets ED

anyone have input or?/
 
FOR SURE, ramp up on the GH dont start out at 4iu a day...I'd even start at 1iu for 30days, 2 next 30 up to 4 per day. If you have no sides early on maybe move up a bit faster but don't dive in like I did.
 
k6jatu37 said:
1-16 prop 75-100/day
1-15 EQ 600/week
GH for sure but need suggestion on that doseage i want
adex everyday or?
and jello packets ED

anyone have input or?/


hes asking about an eq only cycle and your telling him to run test prop for 16 weeks??? or ANY fucking steriod for that matter?

did you hit your head?

16 week cycles are fucking ridiculous for ANYONE but Ronnie and his buddies on stage at the olympia... get your head out of your ass and do some research before you post advice
 
bilter said:
eq only is kind of wasting your time IMO but if thats all you're going to do you don't need anything else with it. It does not aromatise or convert to dht or give very good gains for that matter


just cuz eq doesn't work well with you, doesn't mean it doesnt' work well with others, as your implied "very good gains.." EQ is great for the cardiovascular athlete or for the weightgainer who wants about 10-15 pounds of good solid mass. Of course it doesn't compare to dbol, test or deca, but it's a solid gainer and great for those who are lean and cut.
 
get456- what is that a code.
read up on things.
read up on things.
read up on things.
by the way are you on any other boards or do i need peers pressure

thanks for reading jibberish... just my .05 cents, got me?
 
get456 said:
hes asking about an eq only cycle and your telling him to run test prop for 16 weeks??? or ANY fucking steriod for that matter?

did you hit your head?

16 week cycles are fucking ridiculous for ANYONE but Ronnie and his buddies on stage at the olympia... get your head out of your ass and do some research before you post advice
Well Id like to hear your advice then.
 
bigmark1515 said:
Well Id like to hear your advice then.

I dont post advice for someone that lists none of the following:

Goals
Experience
Age
Size
Diet (or a rough idea)
What they have available
Training Regimen currently


But i WILL smack around other stupid motherfuckers for their advice given without the aforementioned information

Generally I assume if someone wants advice and doesnt list any of those they shouldnt be using anything at all....

So I take that back I WILL post advice:

Go to GNC, get some protein and creatine... take those for 2-3 years and then come back and ask

:)
 
k6jatu37 said:
1-16 prop 75-100/day
1-15 EQ 600/week
GH for sure but need suggestion on that doseage i want
adex everyday or?
and jello packets ED

anyone have input or?/


Prop is a great drug, but 16 weeks of it everyday is just asking to feel like a pin cushion bro. If he is running a long cycle you should def. use long esters like a cyp or enan. and jumpstart the first 4 weeks with a prop.

And GH? I mean, i don't mind you offering the guy advice about test, because every cycle should have some test, but you have no idea who this guy is and GH is a very costly/big step to take.
 
there's alot of love going around here....an all eq cycle....I'm sure someone will say add some test with it....

I've never ever done a cycle without some kind of test...maybe i'm too old school....But I'm reading that alot of guys are running deca and trens and they dont have proviron or hcg on hand....

So I dont think this was an out of line question....look at the guys who do a d-bol only cycle...now thats fucking ridiculous ...IMHO
 
k6jatu37 said:
i still say read up on things cause it is my cycle but id rather not jack it.


I just figured it out.... someone posts asking for advice on an EQ only cycle


and then YOU RANDOMLY list what YOU want to take... WTF is that

first of all... GET YOUR OWN FUCKING THREAD

Second of all.... Again.. you obviously dont know SHIT about what you are putting inyour body, so stay away from AS, go get some ANOBOLEXMAXHARDON from GNC and stick with that
 
sparetire said:
just cuz eq doesn't work well with you, doesn't mean it doesnt' work well with others, as your implied "very good gains.." EQ is great for the cardiovascular athlete or for the weightgainer who wants about 10-15 pounds of good solid mass. Of course it doesn't compare to dbol, test or deca, but it's a solid gainer and great for those who are lean and cut.

I was not implying that it does not have its place. It certianly does and I use it frequently for the very reasons that you wrote about. My "very good gains" statement was in comparison to other aas available. If I were going to run a one steroid cycle it would not be eq is the point I was making....not that eq is useless
 
EQ, like Deca in your other thread, is not a compound you want to run if you have a chance of being tested.

Straight test, 500mgs/wk for 10 weeks is all you need.
 
get456 said:
But i WILL smack around other stupid motherfuckers for their advice given without the aforementioned information

Why dont you just go to BB.com to flame people and act like a child?

If you have a lot of knowledge, then please share it, but dont be a dick about it. You can disagree with people without acting like a jerk.
 
KD1 said:
Why dont you just go to BB.com to flame people and act like a child?

If you have a lot of knowledge, then please share it, but dont be a dick about it. You can disagree with people without acting like a jerk.

We are talking about steroids... not dosages for levitra and asking about the best athritis doctor...

I FIRMLY believe that people should COME to the board with questions having already gained background knowledge... This sissy hand holding shit to a bunch of people that have NO desire to truly LEARN about what they are doing and do it right is EXACTLY why juice has the rep it does... a bunch of people that dont give a shit about truly training and bettering themselves get hurt and then blame it on the juice...

My responses were NOT to the original poster even, they were to the other idiots that give unfounded, unintelligent advice... or the guy that asks for opinions on his OWN cycle in some random thread, when it is quite clear he has done NONE of his own research.
 
lol actually ive been around since 1999... that was when i first started... I've seen more boards come and go then most people have ever heard of.

I was around when brovel was the only decent thing you could buy out of mexico

I have been a member here since right around that time too... i just signed up with a different name recently, good times
 
get456 said:
We are talking about steroids... not dosages for levitra and asking about the best athritis doctor...

I FIRMLY believe that people should COME to the board with questions having already gained background knowledge... This sissy hand holding shit to a bunch of people that have NO desire to truly LEARN about what they are doing and do it right is EXACTLY why juice has the rep it does... a bunch of people that dont give a shit about truly training and bettering themselves get hurt and then blame it on the juice...

My responses were NOT to the original poster even, they were to the other idiots that give unfounded, unintelligent advice... or the guy that asks for opinions on his OWN cycle in some random thread, when it is quite clear he has done NONE of his own research.

Hey I understand and appreciate your point of view, but you could have said something firmly and strongly without the insults or name calling. Your response to me was intelligently worded and expressed your strong opinion, but not insulting. I sure you can come up with a similar type response to the other guy. And people would be more likely to listen to and take your advice if it was worded that way.
 
KD1 said:
Hey I understand and appreciate your point of view, but you could have said something firmly and strongly without the insults or name calling. Your response to me was intelligently worded and expressed your strong opinion, but not insulting. I sure you can come up with a similar type response to the other guy. And people would be more likely to listen to and take your advice if it was worded that way.


I feel ya... I just dont tolerate people very well when it comes to stuff like that... and it seems there is a lot of it around here... and it gets tolerated far too easily imo
 
what was your old name...................this flaming sounds oh so familiar!!!

get456 said:
lol actually ive been around since 1999... that was when i first started... I've seen more boards come and go then most people have ever heard of.

I was around when brovel was the only decent thing you could buy out of mexico

I have been a member here since right around that time too... i just signed up with a different name recently, good times
 
Yeah, dude... I feel you, but it's just a message board.. take it all in stride. The people who ask the dumb questions and post like retards are the ones who come on here, do a dbol only cycle and never return. the guys with intelligent posts are the ones that are here to stay
 
get456 said:
hes asking about an eq only cycle and your telling him to run test prop for 16 weeks??? or ANY fucking steriod for that matter?

did you hit your head?

16 week cycles are fucking ridiculous for ANYONE but Ronnie and his buddies on stage at the olympia... get your head out of your ass and do some research before you post advice[/QUOTE

What are you talking about bro? I always run at least 16 wk cycles, usually more around 20 wks and I'm nowhere near Ronnie Coleman size. And by the way, Ronnie and his pro buddies don't run 16 wk cycles...they don't come off, period. Those guys are always on something.

An eq only cycle is a good cycle... just needs to be run at higher doses. If I was going to run it alone I would use 1000-1200 mgs a week (but then I've done 5 or 6 cycles). 4-600 by itself isn't going to do much for an experienced AAS user. I'm not saying it wouldn't be better stacked with something else, but it will do the job at higher doses.
 
ryan04 said:
An eq only cycle is a good cycle... just needs to be run at higher doses. If I was going to run it alone I would use 1000-1200 mgs a week (but then I've done 5 or 6 cycles). 4-600 by itself isn't going to do much for an experienced AAS user. I'm not saying it wouldn't be better stacked with something else, but it will do the job at higher doses.

If you honestly believe that, then YOU are the person I'm talking about

5-6 cycles and you think you need OVER a GRAM of EQ per week?... PLUS whatever other compound you are using

PLEASE do some real research and get back to me...

I promise if you are working out correctly and your diet is on point... you will gain with EVERY cycle and never have to increase dosage IF you allow your body to fully recover, ie- 8 on 8 off with proper PCT

That kind of thinking, again, is why people think steriods are SOOO horribly dangerous
 
ryan04 said:
get456 said:
hes asking about an eq only cycle and your telling him to run test prop for 16 weeks??? or ANY fucking steriod for that matter?

did you hit your head?

16 week cycles are fucking ridiculous for ANYONE but Ronnie and his buddies on stage at the olympia... get your head out of your ass and do some research before you post advice[/QUOTE

What are you talking about bro? I always run at least 16 wk cycles, usually more around 20 wks and I'm nowhere near Ronnie Coleman size. And by the way, Ronnie and his pro buddies don't run 16 wk cycles...they don't come off, period. Those guys are always on something.

An eq only cycle is a good cycle... just needs to be run at higher doses. If I was going to run it alone I would use 1000-1200 mgs a week (but then I've done 5 or 6 cycles). 4-600 by itself isn't going to do much for an experienced AAS user. I'm not saying it wouldn't be better stacked with something else, but it will do the job at higher doses.

Honestly, you are doing more damage than good if you run over 10 wk cycles from my experience. I would do proper PCT if I ran 12 - 16 wk cycles and still lose most of my lean muscle/strength gains. I have been running short cycles of 8 wks and keep most all my gains. I am currently 198 pds at 8% bf and have been off for almost 16 wks. I also am keeping alot of strength gains that I have gained. Short Cycles work for me!!!
 
posted by stuck:
There's way too much dumb in this thread.


you got that right. the amount of dumb in this post can be measured on the richter scale.
 
get456 said:
If you honestly believe that, then YOU are the person I'm talking about

5-6 cycles and you think you need OVER a GRAM of EQ per week?... PLUS whatever other compound you are using

PLEASE do some real research and get back to me...

I promise if you are working out correctly and your diet is on point... you will gain with EVERY cycle and never have to increase dosage IF you allow your body to fully recover, ie- 8 on 8 off with proper PCT

That kind of thinking, again, is why people think steriods are SOOO horribly dangerous

Do some real research? I've done TONS of research PLUS I have YEARS of experience. The question was about running eq alone, NOT STACKING IT. I think 4-600 mgs a week is plenty if stacking it, if not I would run more.
 
ryan04 said:
Do some real research? I've done TONS of research PLUS I have YEARS of experience. The question was about running eq alone, NOT STACKING IT. I think 4-600 mgs a week is plenty if stacking it, if not I would run more.

Ok... Now why would you recommend that? Why would YOU say the dosage should be different if stacked vs not stacked. In fact we are talking about Doubling the dosage...

I would honestly be interested in what your reasoning is and what sources/concepts brought you to that conclusion.


I have read about/researched/used for the last 7 years.. and there are people on this board with WAY more "years" that know less... and probably lots with less that know more... All I ask is that if we (collectively) are going to give or ask for advice, I believe the appropriate background info should be posted.. make sense?
 
Top Bottom