Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Does anybody here believe OJ Simpson to be innocent?

Status
Not open for further replies.

75th

ololollllolloolloloolllol
EF VIP
Just curious, as it seems like common knowledge that we was guilty as sin and only saved by the ineptitude of the prosecution.

Anybody care to differ, and more importantly, offer any reasons why you differ?
 
I should clarify...innocent of the murder of his wife and her hubby.
 
guilty

But his deal with the devil seems to be coming due

images

images
 
the court didnt find him innocent. They just couldnt convict him because the prosecution couldnt meet their burden of proving O.J. guilty beyond a reasonable doubt..big difference.
 
I love this ambitious "reasonable doubt" thing

Think Descartes. There is no end to reasonable doubt. Its a total pretend-term.
 
75th said:
Just curious, as it seems like common knowledge that we was guilty as sin and only saved by the ineptitude of the prosecution.

Anybody care to differ, and more importantly, offer any reasons why you differ?

I thought Maggie Simpson shot Mr Burns.
Didn't OJ say he was going to do everything in his power to find the person responsible. And then every picture of him after that was of him playing golf. Must be some murdering caddy roaming the links somewhere. I think his friend, or white bronco chauffeur, Al Cowling knows more about this than came out and I don't recall seeing him at the trial.

and lol @ your bookie blood bath -- what happened ?
 
Reedguru punches that question as best as I have ever heard it, longhorn85 counters with a great right hook and forces reeds point to wobble at the knees with what is the noble truth and commendable.

Shoot and all I was thinking was what stupid question!

Wow, there is a new breed of bodybuilders out there IB's (intelligent bodybuilders)
 
Longhorn85 said:
How are those two different in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty?

In the eyes of the government there is no difference. He was still held responsible in the civil proceeding. In the eyes of the populace I would believe that he is not innocent. Only he truly knows, and if there is a great wheel of life to be judged upon at death, I believe he will be found wanting.
 
It's a legal term. It simply means the prosecution did not meet its burden. They did not do their job effectively. This burden is used with regard to all criminal trials.

There are a number of burdens of proof in law, each having differing levels of the burden of proof. some examples are: beyond a reasonable doubt, presumption of innocence, clear and convincing evidence, preponderance of evidence.

Hiatussin said:
I love this ambitious "reasonable doubt" thing

Think Descartes. There is no end to reasonable doubt. Its a total pretend-term.
 
Wootoom said:
muhammad ali is a fuckin pussy.seriously.


Do you get wrestling in Canada? Have you seen Ric Flair on TV? The man is 60+, still wrestles, goes to a tanning booth, bleaches his hair and has bitch titties.


Love you.
 
dannomight said:
mike tyson woulda kicked his ass.



Bahahahaha that's funny. No really that's funny. Everyone says that now. But everyone is wrong. Mike Tyson couldn't beat the greats of his time so how could he beat the Greatest of All Time? Tyson couldn't even get to Ali.

George Foreman and Mike Tyson are very similiar fighter. Brawlers who go for one punch. Can't go long.

Ali knocked out Foreman.
 
Law Enforcement and The Courts are infallable. If he was found Not Guilty, then he didn't do it.
 
eat big said:
Bahahahaha that's funny. No really that's funny. Everyone says that now. But everyone is wrong. Mike Tyson couldn't beat the greats of his time so how could he beat the Greatest of All Time? Tyson couldn't even get to Ali.

George Foreman and Mike Tyson are very similiar fighter. Brawlers who go for one punch. Can't go long.

Ali knocked out Foreman.
tyson wouldve fuckin killed him. not even a challenge
 
Wootoom said:
tyson wouldve fuckin killed him. not even a challenge



That's what njjuice said. He then watched the Rumble in the Jungle and realized anyone who can know out a 6'5" George Foreman can knock out a 5'11" Mike Tyson.



Tyson wouldn't have even of been able to get to Ali. Ali beat Frazier, Foreman, Liston and Patterson who many think are some of the better heavyweights of all time. Who did Mike Tyson beat?
 
eat big said:
That's what njjuice said. He then watched the Rumble in the Jungle and realized anyone who can know out a 6'5" George Foreman can knock out a 5'11" Mike Tyson.



Tyson wouldn't have even of been able to get to Ali. Ali beat Frazier, Foreman, Liston and Patterson who many think are some of the better heavyweights of all time. Who did Mike Tyson beat?
arnold schwarzenegger
 
I do have to ask, why so many posts about black people?
 
Here we go again. You never know where these threads are gonna turn. Best of all time in his prime, Mike Tyson. Watching his early fights it appeared as though you were watching a tape on fast forward. The man was blazing fast and extremely powerful. Joe Frazier knocked Ali down, Norton broke his jaw. Tyson would have caved his face in and shut his big mouth.
 
biteme said:
Here we go again. You never know where these threads are gonna turn. Best of all time in his prime, Mike Tyson. Watching his early fights it appeared as though you were watching a tape on fast forward. The man was blazing fast and extremely powerful. Joe Frazier knocked Ali down, Norton broke his jaw. Tyson would have caved his face in and shut his big mouth.



But once Buster Douglas knocked out Mike Tyson, many would say he never really woke up. Frazier is a much better opponent than anyone Tyson fought.
 
Mr. dB said:
Law Enforcement and The Courts are infallable. If he was found Not Guilty, then he didn't do it.
So, automatically every person who is found guilty of a crime actually did it?
 
c00per said:
and lol @ your bookie blood bath -- what happened ?
It was awesome.
 
biteme said:
I do have to ask, why so many posts about black people?
Because it gets everybody's panties in a bunch.
 
White people are pussies.

If either victim was say hispanic -- OJ would've been taken out of a street gang ages ago. They'd put a bounty on his head.

White people are trained in america to be halpless guilt-ridden victims. As long as they control the wealth -- it's "okay".
 
Wootoom said:
who fuckin cares really

How about the victoms families? I bet they care that the state lets that loser go free. I tell you what if I was the dad of his exwife or the goldstein or whatever his name is OJ would not be alive right now just because the prosecution and the jury was a bunch of stupid morons.
 
curling said:
How about the victoms families? I bet they care that the state lets that loser go free. I tell you what if I was the dad of his exwife or the goldstein or whatever his name is OJ would not be alive right now just because the prosecution and the jury was a bunch of stupid morons.
ya but its OVER there nothing that gonna be done about it. ya it sucks but whats the point????
 
The main reason people still talk about it is because they think that the court system failed. Also because it shows their is still racism in America today. I think many people were in denial that racism did still exist and this court case just proves it.

I'll never forget the reactions seen across America when the not guilty verdict was given. A room of white people watching TV just about shit themselves in shock. And a room of black people shit themselves out of joy.
 
eat big said:
The main reason people still talk about it is because they think that the court system failed. Also because it shows their is still racism in America today. I think many people were in denial that racism did still exist and this court case just proves it.

I'll never forget the reactions seen across America when the not guilty verdict was given. A room of white people watching TV just about shit themselves in shock. And a room of black people shit themselves out of joy.
oh this about racism now???????????? holy fuck i knew that would come up im outta here. these threads get nasty
 
Did someone say the words "race thread?"
 
75th said:
Just curious, as it seems like common knowledge that we was guilty as sin and only saved by the ineptitude of the prosecution.

Anybody care to differ, and more importantly, offer any reasons why you differ?
Well, my father and I hired an investigator over the summer and this guy happened to be in charge of all the investigation in the Chicago area for the OJ case. This invetsigator has also been on CNN and MSNBC and has been instrumental in solving other high profile cases. Anyway, he said that OJ did not kill Nicole and in fact, OJ's adult son did because Nicole and the adult son were sleeping together and he killed her and OJ covered up for him.
 
gjohnson5 said:
Every thread he creates is about black folks. I'm glad someone besides me notices his racism...
Standard gjohnson stupidity: creating a thread asking a question about someone who happens to be black = believing one race is superior to another.
 
Smurfy said:
Well, my father and I hired an investigator over the summer and this guy happened to be in charge of all the investigation in the Chicago area for the OJ case. This invetsigator has also been on CNN and MSNBC and has been instrumental in solving other high profile cases. Anyway, he said that OJ did not kill Nicole and in fact, OJ's adult son did because Nicole and the adult son were sleeping together and he killed her and OJ covered up for him.
Thats interesting...but, did OJ know this was going to happen before it played out?
 
gjohnson5 said:
ghb...

To quote Wootoom,
"shutup you pussy"

you still in New Orleans? my folks are there right now working for the civlian army...they say things are still waaay fucked
 
gjohnson5 said:
The only one stupid is the one with -2mil K. You're less then a loser and yes you are racist. ALL the threads you create are some knock on black folks , not just this one
LOL at calling me stupid because of my karma. :FRlol:

And Im not knocking anybody, simply asking a question. I was a big fan of the juice until he decided to murder his wife.
 
75th said:
LOL at calling me stupid because of my karma. :FRlol:

And Im not knocking anybody, simply asking a question. I was a big fan of the juice until he decided to murder his wife.

nicole was fucking hottt, real thick.
 
gjohnson5 said:
I go back frequently
Things will be "fucked" for atleast 3 years
some parts of the city are better than other areas.....the french quarter and the adjacent area of bywater/marigny (close to the river) looks good..,,,hopefully, after the elections next month, recovery will improve. :worried:





yeh, nicolle was hot. ;)
 
Originally posted by 75th
Indeed.

Covering it up is one thing, but there seems to be too much evidence pointing the finger at him to ignore.
The last time I checked DNA evidence either put a guilty man behind bars or set an innocent man even an innocent inmate free.
 
rnch said:
some parts of the city are better than other areas.....the french quarter and the adjacent area of bywater/marigny (close to the river) looks good..,,,hopefully, after the elections next month, recovery will improve. :worried:





yeh, nicolle was hot. ;)
Apparently, gjNagin's vision of another segregated city will not come to pass:

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/27/D8FD93801.html
 
dannomight said:
The last time I checked DNA evidence either put a guilty man behind bars or set an innocent man even an innocent inmate free.
Quick question: do you think that if the trial was done over again today (and there was no cop involved making any inappropriate comments about someones race) that juice would be found not guilty?

I, and a lot of other folks, simply think that there were way too many small mistakes/mishaps made by the prosecution that allowed OJ to walk.

I still cant decide whether or not to label that as "sad" since I honestly did like the guy. My parents met him a few times back in the day and said he was the nicest person.
 
Originally posted by 75th
Quick question: do you think that if the trial was done over again today (and there was no cop involved making any inappropriate comments about someones race) that juice would be found not guilty?

I, and a lot of other folks, simply think that there were way too many small mistakes/mishaps made by the prosecution that allowed OJ to walk.

I still cant decide whether or not to label that as "sad" since I honestly did like the guy. My parents met him a few times back in the day and said he was the nicest person.
OJ was way too rich and famous to go to jail. He still would have been found not guilty like Rober Blake. Once I think about even if found guilty he wouldn't have had a very strict sentince or ppunishment. He would have probably been charged with voluntary manslaughter or some other lesser crime.
 
dannomight said:
OJ was way too rich and famous to go to jail. He still would have been found not guilty like Rober Blake. Once I think about even if found guilty he wouldn't have had a very strict sentince or ppunishment. He would have probably been charged with voluntary manslaughter or some other lesser crime.
True that.

I forgot about Robert Blake. That guy was a tool.

Money Train sucked.
 
rnch said:
some parts of the city are better than other areas.....the french quarter and the adjacent area of bywater/marigny (close to the river) looks good..,,,hopefully, after the elections next month, recovery will improve. :worried:





yeh, nicolle was hot. ;)

True , but New Orleans east is still under curfew...
The lakeview area around the levee break they were supposed to start bulldozing those houses
 
dannomight said:
The last time I checked DNA evidence either put a guilty man behind bars or set an innocent man even an innocent inmate free.


Well when criminalists mishandle evidence and it was even recorded during the case the blood evidence may have been taken out of the lab... That point should be (and was) taken into account

The bronco (with blood on it) was not recorded into the police impounds but when it was located it had blood all over it , lol

Even 75th could have done a better frame job
 
Originally posted by gjohnson
Well when criminalists mishandle evidence and it was even recorded during the case the blood evidence may have been taken out of the lab... That point should be (and was) taken into account

The bronco (with blood on it) was not recorded into the police impounds but when it was located it had blood all over it , lol

Even 75th could have done a better frame job
Why would an innocent man lead police on a chase. What did he have to hide?

He is still innocent by jury though. A jury the defense gets to select.
 
dannomight said:
Why would an innocent man lead police on a chase. What did he have to hide?
No shit.
 
redguru said:
In the eyes of the government there is no difference. He was still held responsible in the civil proceeding. In the eyes of the populace I would believe that he is not innocent. Only he truly knows, and if there is a great wheel of life to be judged upon at death, I believe he will be found wanting.


That populace is divided along a racial line...
 
gjohnson5 said:
That populace is divided along a racial line...
And you dont see a problem with black people wanting him to be let off because hes black?

I know you see a problem with white people wanting him to be found guilty so I wont even mention it.
 
75th said:
And you dont see a problem with black people wanting him to be let off because hes black?

I know you see a problem with white people wanting him to be found guilty so I wont even mention it.

I have a problem with idiots such as yourself making issues about race when they don't have the first clue of what theyare talking about

If you equated the cheers for a black man being acquitted for murder then you once again need to shut up.
 
gjohnson5 said:
I have a problem with idiots such as yourself making issues about race when they don't have the first clue of what theyare talking about

If you equated the cheers for a black man being acquitted for murder then you once again need to shut up.
Dateline NBC about 3 months back they did a recap of the aftermath of the OJ trial. You should have watched it. It spent about 40 minutes exploring the divided reaction based on race.

Talk about not having the first clue of what you are talking about.

Everyone knows you are a racist retard ("RR" from now on), so I was interested to hear some more of your pathetic "reasoning."
 
:lmao:

You trying to label me when everyone knows what types of threads you open up everyday and the comments you make in those threads , :evil:

I don't care about Dateline's point of view or what some reporter at Dateline said. But then again you probably can't recall anything from that report or what the reports in that report meant, so there's no point in arguing. You have to be able to think before you can get someone's point of view...

I don't believe OJ's race had anything to do with that reaction. They were cheering for something that you wouldn't understand
 
The only thing that really pissed me off about the whole OJ thing was that friggin Bronco chase made tv cut away from the Rockets-Knicks game 5 in the Finals.
 
gjohnson5 said:
:lmao:

You trying to label me when everyone knows what types of threads you open up everyday and the comments you make in those threads , :evil:

I don't care about Dateline's point of view or what some reporter at Dateline said. But then again you probably can't recall anything from that report or what the reports in that report meant, so there's no point in arguing. You have to be able to think before you can get someone's point of view...

I don't believe OJ's race had anything to do with that reaction. They were cheering for something that you wouldn't understand
According to you, the one thing I dont understand is race, apparently.

So tell me, what dont I understand? Why were they cheering?

And by the way, I remember the report very well, as I thought it was interesting. But then again, Im a big fan of learning stuff. Im sure they had some good shows on UPN that night, but you should really learn to open your mind a little.

Everyone knows youre an idiot. You should really stop trying...well...anything.
 
75th said:
According to you, the one thing I dont understand is race, apparently.

So tell me, what dont I understand? Why were they cheering?

And by the way, I remember the report very well, as I thought it was interesting. But then again, Im a big fan of learning stuff. Im sure they had some good shows on UPN that night, but you should really learn to open your mind a little.

Everyone knows youre an idiot. You should really stop trying...well...anything.

I don't wanna waste my time going back to 75th quotes even though it would be too easy to expose you. You are racist and everyone knows it. You cannot think or tell right from wrong. You are the lowest parasite here...

What I'm about to say is actually pretty simple, but since were talk about sub 0th here...
 
gjohnson5 said:
I don't wanna waste my time going back to 75th quotes even though it would be too easy to expose you. You are racist and everyone knows it. You cannot think or tell write from wrong. You are the lowest parasite here...

What I'm about to say is actually pretty simple, but since were talk about sub 0th here...
I remember about 4 separate times where you said you were going to dig up a bunch of my supposedly racist quotes or quotes that "make me look 0th" but so far you have come up empty handed.

Funny considering the virtual library of retarded quotes the entire board has on you.

You cannot think or tell write from wrong.

A new one thats definately going into the collection! :FRlol:
 
gjohnson5 said:
You haven't won anying except my lable that you're racist. I will make sure it's branded like a stomp in the face.
:laugh2: :FRlol: :laugh2: :FRlol: :laugh2: :FRlol: :laugh2: :FRlol: :laugh2: :FRlol: :laugh2: :FRlol: :laugh2: :FRlol:
 
Get over it people. Our courts make mistakes every day. Many times a guilty person goes free and occasionally an innocent one goes to prison. There's no such thing as a perfect judicial system.
 
75th is not racist on this board. He seems to say what is on a lot of peoples minds and it happens to be very un-PC, but not racist. If that makes him a racist its only because the label "racist" is thrown around too loosely.
In case anyone forgot the actual definition or racism or racist:

Racism: The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
Racist: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion. Antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite. A person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others.
Show me where 75th fits this definition and maybe your accusations will have merit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom