Do you think NEW More anabolic steroids will be invented ?

[DeepZenPill]

If you think about it, the only reasons legit pharmaceutical companies produce anabolics is for HRT or to prevent wasting. We basically have all the drugs we need for these cases, and it's not really an issue of finding a drug that works better. We aren't really taking full advantage of these hormones as far as medical use is concerned.

Supposedly there are some small labs that create designer steroids for the sole purpose of avoiding detection for tested athletes. These labs will never mass produce their shit because they want to keep the substances obscure.

I suppose someone could invent a new steroid, but most people don't have the assets for such an endeavour. Pat Arnold "rediscovered" 1-test, but too bad it's inferior to many pharm AAS and isn't yet useful as an injectable. Guys like him are trying to invent new shit just because they can sell it as supplements before the government steps in. Maybe they'll get lucky and make something that really works. But I guarantee that if this ever happens... it won't be cheap.

 

[Rockey]

I read about 2 years ago in a Sports Illustrated that doctors were working on a new steroid. When tested on rats, it increased their muscle size 24 times. Thats right, 24 times!! They say it is supposed to improve eyesight also but think it could kill a person pretty quickly so it isn't released yet. I am pretty sure it would be underground but they say it might come out in another 13 years. They also stated that sports records would instantly be shattered if pro athletes got a hold of the drug. (obviously)

 

[slobberknocker]

Human Genome Project.

-sk

Yes, I've heard "gene doping" is next. I don't know anything at all about it though.

 

[sk*]

Yes, I've heard "gene doping" is next. I don't know anything at all about it though.

They already use it on animals. Like the chickens we eat, they have no feathers or beaks. They genetically altered them supposedly cause the feathers were a problem when tryring to skin them and they "gave" them no beaks cause they used to fight a lot when kept in small cages.

They basically use it on animals for "ease of manufacturing."

-sk

 

[slobberknocker]

They already use it on animals. Like the chickens we eat, they have no feathers or beaks. They genetically altered them supposedly cause the feathers were a problem when tryring to skin them and they "gave" them no beaks cause they used to fight a lot when kept in small cages.

They basically use it on animals for "ease of manufacturing."

-sk

Can you actually do this on an animal that has already been born, or can you only do this to an embryo or something?

 

[sk*]

Can you actually do this on an animal that has already been born, or can you only do this to an embryo or something?

No not if it's born, they do it to the egg sperm whatever ...

-sk

 

[bpdaddy]

esterfied winny!

 

[Mr.Holland]

Yeah i also heard of gene doping...
I've red that doctors already can do something to your genes so your body will make cells (musclecells) on its own. It just creates its own protein en just grows and grows....
Weird stuff bro..

 

[DJ_UFO]

bro in the future with genetic medicine everything will be possible. Actual AAS will not exist at all..probably just some of them and waaay improved. In the future, doctors and bodybuilders will work directly on you genes. either your muscle cells or brain cells. We will have the possibility to play with muscle cells and a lot of different enzimes to give the correct orders to muscles...like multiply themselves, or get bigger. Or simply prepare you body at early years to grow to a desired size when you are an adult. We will have soldiers genetically perfect, or even clones with the perfect muscularity to go to war. Our grandsons will not believe how their grandpas got all those ineffective juices on their asses detroying themselves inside.
And of course, i hope and i'm pretty sure that our nation will be the first on all those new things. It is on our hands.
God Bless America.

 

[Qrios]

Hopefully more medical doctors will have a more scientific view on HRT for older people.
If they do there will be money in the business and the companies will research.
On the other hand, it’s probably more money in medicines to treat the symptoms of low test levels than just give people aas.