Daylight Savings tonight!

[jh1]

Because she didn't have the heart to tell you you're WRONG!

Not wrong.

Come fuck with me and I'll show you....

 

[Stefka]

You didn't answer my question.

The threat has to be imminent.
If someone is chasing you with a machete you can stomp some teeth or threaten to stomp some teeth.
If you fear that someone might chase you with a machete a week from Tuesday, the law prefers that you go to the authorities.

 

[jh1]

The threat has to be imminent.
If someone is chasing you with a machete you can stomp some teeth or threaten to stomp some teeth.
If you fear that someone might chase you with a machete a week from Tuesday, the law prefers that you go to the authorities.

Understood.

My example and question was specific enough to cover this.

If you or someone was under an unlawfull attack and you reasonably thought that death or serious injury would occur you are allowed to defend with the use of opposing physical force, as long as it isn't excessive.

 

[Stefka]

Understood.

My example and question was specific enough to cover this.

If you or someone was under an unlawfull attack and you reasonably thought that death or serious injury would occur you are allowed to defend with the use of opposing physical force, as long as it isn't excessive.

Isn't this all about you threatening to stomp a drug dealer's teeth down his throat if he didn't stop giving your ex coke?

But to answer your question, yes.
If we're talking about the use of non-deadly force in self-defense...
"A non-aggressor is justified in using force upon another if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to protect himself from IMMINENT use of unlawful force by the other person. The use of force must not be excessive in relation to the harm threatened."
Straight out of my crim law outline, so it must be reliable.

 

[jh1]

Isn't this all about you threatening to stomp a drug dealer's teeth down his throat if he didn't stop giving your ex coke?

But to answer your question, yes.
If we're talking about the use of non-deadly force in self-defense...
"A non-aggressor is justified in using force upon another if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to protect himself from IMMINENT use of unlawful force by the other person. The use of force must not be excessive in relation to the harm threatened."
Straight out of my crim law outline, so it must be reliable.

It started from the threat, but Samote left me with the saying that stomping someone's teeth in wouldn't be legal under any circumstances. I disagree.

My threat was purposely contingent upon a vague action upon his part - 'endangering' my child. I understand it's skating on thin ice, but I'm okay with that.

 

[Stefka]

It started from the threat, but Samote left me with the saying that stomping someone's teeth in wouldn't be legal under any circumstances. I disagree.

My threat was purposely contingent upon a vague action upon his part - 'endangering' my child. I understand it's skating on thin ice, but I'm okay with that.

You're only supposed to fight back long enough to escape the imminent danger. So if you incapacitate the aggressor and then proceed to stomp his fucking teeth down his throat, you're probably using excessive force.

 

[jh1]

You're only supposed to fight back long enough to escape the imminent danger. So if you incapacitate the aggressor and then proceed to stomp his fucking teeth down his throat, you're probably using excessive force.

Your assuming the face stomping wasn't the incapacitating blow...

 

[Smurfy]

Phone, Computer, Satellite TV all auto set...

Now I gota change my alarm clock, my stove, my microwave, my watch.

thanks for the update
let us know how that goes
praying it all comes out ok

 

[Stefka]

Your assuming the face stomping wasn't the incapacitating blow...

If the teeth smashing blow is the first incapacitating blow, then you're golden.

 

[samoth]

sammy why do you post on law boards?

'the same reason you post on fitness boards' is not a credited response.

I don't post there. I just read it.

They're a split college/grad/law admissions discussion forum. I used to read it for college topics, then eventually found the law board to be full of drama and interesting topics as the most popular board on the site. Moreover, I am e-stalking Stefka.