Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Creepy-ass cracker to get his gun back!
- Thread starter PICK3
- Start date
I'm not sayin....I'm just sayin. It's looking like a duck to me.
The law is good, how its applied by individual prosecutors to each case is bad.
Now the crack laws of the 80's is actually bad because of the disproportionate amount of minority users. And the fact that theres no substantial difference between crack (mostly minority use) and cocaine (more widespread use in all races)
A child? When was trevon a child? 5 years before his death?
I believe he was 17 hardly a child.
Wow lets at least keep this honest.
I believe he was 17 hardly a child.
Wow lets at least keep this honest.
dont let facts get in the way of the agenda.
I believe that most people are like me who have never used the N or the C word and treat everyone equally not because I had to try but because it's natural to be open minded about everyone regardless of appearance. I refuse to be manipulated by our retarded media who twisted this case into one of divide and hatred by continuing to call him white so much so that our African American president, (voted for by mostly Latino and whites) one who holds the highest office in our land, had to speak and say that because racism and hatred is so high in America that it could have been him? What? So it could have been him because he was an African American or a male teen at one point?
My neighborhood had a string of break-ins one that I managed to stop because I walked in on them. In the weeks following the break-ins I became hyper-vigilant and I even followed some suspicious people. I realize that following them may have been dumb but it's a natural reaction to defend and protect your home when you feel your living area is being targeted. It's not normal to not have that reaction. We started a neighborhood watch and part of that was to watch out for suspicious activity and call the police when we saw it. Had I called the police and 911 told me not to follow, I wouldn't have but I don't know what a man would do in that high alert state, even I followed people. The criteria of suspicious could be picked apart by people in the aftermath (it wasn't based on race, but on the type of vehicles in the neighborhood and age of the people, loitering etc). Teens of all races break into homes. White teens, black teens, latino teens...teenagers commit crimes like break-ins and vandalism in neighborhoods. A lot of teenagers behave in aggressive ways that are stupid, and a lot of men are lucky to be alive today having experienced that stage in life in just a fight or fight response. I believe if Martin was white, latino, any other teen that didn't look like a proper nerd would have been followed by Zimmerman because was on high alert. I know because i experienced it myself. This teen, running off of ego threw the first punch, like a lot of teens do, and was killed and now all of us are divided as hell. Zimmerman may or may not be a racist, but we aren't all racists. We keep allowing ourselves to be divided by an either bored or evil media with ulterior motives.
Boycotting the entire state of Florida? What about the African American businesses in Florida? What about the blacks in Florida? The stand your ground law is dangerous? Really, defending yourself is dangerous now? That's great, when all the stand your ground laws are revoked guess who can't defend themselves? African Americans. It's insane. That law wasn't even used in this case, why are we talking about it? It wasn't. Don't buy into this. Zimmerman did not use a stand your ground defense.
Under Florida's 'Stand Your Ground' Law, Black and White Defendants Fare Equally Well - Hit & Run : Reason.com
My neighborhood had a string of break-ins one that I managed to stop because I walked in on them. In the weeks following the break-ins I became hyper-vigilant and I even followed some suspicious people. I realize that following them may have been dumb but it's a natural reaction to defend and protect your home when you feel your living area is being targeted. It's not normal to not have that reaction. We started a neighborhood watch and part of that was to watch out for suspicious activity and call the police when we saw it. Had I called the police and 911 told me not to follow, I wouldn't have but I don't know what a man would do in that high alert state, even I followed people. The criteria of suspicious could be picked apart by people in the aftermath (it wasn't based on race, but on the type of vehicles in the neighborhood and age of the people, loitering etc). Teens of all races break into homes. White teens, black teens, latino teens...teenagers commit crimes like break-ins and vandalism in neighborhoods. A lot of teenagers behave in aggressive ways that are stupid, and a lot of men are lucky to be alive today having experienced that stage in life in just a fight or fight response. I believe if Martin was white, latino, any other teen that didn't look like a proper nerd would have been followed by Zimmerman because was on high alert. I know because i experienced it myself. This teen, running off of ego threw the first punch, like a lot of teens do, and was killed and now all of us are divided as hell. Zimmerman may or may not be a racist, but we aren't all racists. We keep allowing ourselves to be divided by an either bored or evil media with ulterior motives.
Boycotting the entire state of Florida? What about the African American businesses in Florida? What about the blacks in Florida? The stand your ground law is dangerous? Really, defending yourself is dangerous now? That's great, when all the stand your ground laws are revoked guess who can't defend themselves? African Americans. It's insane. That law wasn't even used in this case, why are we talking about it? It wasn't. Don't buy into this. Zimmerman did not use a stand your ground defense.
Under Florida's 'Stand Your Ground' Law, Black and White Defendants Fare Equally Well - Hit & Run : Reason.com
Fla. Stat. § 776.032 (2013)
§ 776.032. Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force
(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.
(2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful.
(3) The court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (1).
That means you wouldn't even be prosecuted. It's a pre-trial hearing. If you use it and are successful there is no criminal trial.
Fact - Laws, whatever state they are applied in, all too often are not applied equally when it comes to race. Research historical sentencing for cocaine (where defendants are more likely white) versus crack (where defendants are more likely black).
ADK Madman
New member
They need to take guns away from people that plan to use them for killing.
That's what guns are for...they're not toys...no one should carry/own a gun unless your prepared to use it
Sent from my DROID4 using EliteFitness
Similar threads
