Burning_Inside said:
Rape a sickness? Come on, what is with you, are just trying to get under my skin or what is your deal? First off in this day and age rape is wrong in a few ways, but a sickness? No. First off, I don't think anyone has any right to do whatever they feel to someone elses body without permission. Way back when, when we were "pea brains", there was no such thing as rape, because it was just plain outright the thing that males did. They were horny they banged chicks, wether they wanted it or not. No one said anything. it's just "the way it was" so to speak.
It's an innate desire. Just like killing. However being we're a little advanced nowadays, and times have changed obviously these things just don't fit like they used to.
Bro, you have some serious anger issues you need to deal with. Since when is a legitimate question asked in a non-offensive matter a way for someone to "attempt to get under your skin"?
I didn't say that rape was a sickness. It is a violent act. Sex is only the vehicle by which this violence is perpetrated. The "sickness" lies with the individual who would even conceive of torturing and degrading a human being with one of the most intimate acts that can occur between two ADULT human beings. In rape there is only one consentual adult, C'est nes pas? One could argue and say that when someone continues to be sexually aroused by another that obviously wants nothing to do with that person, let alone have intercourse with them that that person is "sick" (In other words, their mind is not healthy).
It has NOTHING to do with some dumb male being horny. Because even a dumb male would lose his desire when he realizes that this is no longer about fulfilling his need to quench his lust and has crossed over to his desire to degrade and harm another human being. But then again, said male might be off the opinion that females are not human or perhaps "less human" than they are making it ok. What is your take on that?
But I digress....
Any adult that can be sexually aroused by an individual that is not only physically immature whether that is a 2 month old infant (yes, it does happen) or an adolescent that has barely entered puberty, an individual that is by all accounts also mentally and emotionally immature to understand and/or handle the rammifications of such an act - could be described as "sick".
What is wrong with you Burning Inside?
The perpetrator is "REAL SORRY"?
"REAL SORRY"?
My question is how did that person's penis become erect in the first place? and not whether or not that person is sorry that he has FOREVER damaged another innocent little human being in a way that is perhaps one of the most haneous. Perhaps that is why the perpetrators of these crimes are looked on as "sick". Because obviously somewhere along the line something went terribly wrong in their brains that would even allow the arousal at the thought to occur, let alone the desire and CAPABILITY to act on such a desire.
...Am I far enough under your skin yet, Sugarplumb?
(Don't mind me too much. I am just being a flirty female.)