Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

California Bill Would Force Hiring of Cross-Dressers/Transvestites

p0ink

New member
Bill would force hiring of cross-dressers
WorldNetDaily | April 21, 2003

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The Democrat-controlled California Assembly passed a bill today mandating fines of up to $150,000 against business owners – including Bible bookstores and nonprofit organizations such as the Boy Scouts – for refusing to hire cross-dressing and transsexual job applicants.

After more than 45 minutes of debate, with a majority of speakers opposing the bill, AB 196 passed the Assembly by the narrowest of margins. The vote was 41 to 34, the bare minimum needed to advance the bill to the state Senate. All the "yes" votes on AB 196 were from Democrats. Voting "no" were 31 Republicans and three Democrats – Lou Correa of Santa Ana, Nicole Parra of Bakersfield and Sarah Reyes of Fresno. Abstaining were Republican Bonnie Garcia of El Centro and four Democrats: Ed Chavez of La Puente, Jerome Horton of Inglewood, Barbara Matthews of Stockton and George Nakano of Torrance.


Authored by homosexual Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, AB 196 would insert a new definition of "gender" into the powerful state Fair Employment and Housing Act. The bill's subjective definition of "gender" is "identity, appearance, or behavior, whether or not that identity, appearance, or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the victim's sex at birth."

Leno has cited reports from the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the San Francisco Department of Public Health and several other studies that have documented widespread discrimination against what he calls "transgender people."

"In San Francisco studies indicate that the unemployment rate for transgender people is 70 percent" Leno said. "Every Californian deserves the right to a job and to a home. "We must do everything in our power to protect such fundamental human rights," he said.

AB 196 would force employers to allow male employees to wear women's clothes and deny religious business owners to follow their own moral convictions opposing cross-dressing or sex changes.

"We're going to use the might of government to come forward at this point of time and say you can be fined over a hundred thousand dollars if for some reason the image you want to put forward in your business does not comport to how an employee wants to dress," said Assemblyman Rick Keene of Chico. "I'm urging a 'no' vote."

Assemblyman John Campbell of Irvine was one of several members who spoke about how AB 196 further harms California businesses.

"This (bill) talks about 'gender,' but in the concept of the individual's perception of their gender, thereby making that protected class something that can change, can come in and out, can go back and forth and is not identifiable through any physical attribute," he said. "This bill will cause untold lawsuits, untold new problems in the workplace and further denies the right of businesses to earn your patronage."

Also speaking against AB 196 was Dennis Mountjoy of Monrovia.

"If I have a Christian bookstore, how could I possibly follow this law?" he asked. "How could I possibly have an employee that's here today in a dress, tomorrow may come in a suit, and then stay in a dress? How can I possibly employ this employee and still have the Christian bookstore and live by my faith?"

"You are messing with people's perception of their souls and their afterlife," said Assemblyman Ray Haynes of Temecula. "You are telling people who sincerely and strongly believe in a faith that they cannot exercise that faith without being forced into bankruptcy or not owning property or not starting a business! You are imposing your belief on what you think their faith ought to say."

Gov. Gray Davis, a Democrat, is so far remained silent on AB 196.

"This bill would give drag queens unprecedented power to persecute the Boy Scouts and religious businesses, even the power to shut down a Bible bookstore," said Randy Thomasson, executive director of Campaign for California Families, a statewide nonprofit, nonpartisan family issues leadership organization. "People aren't going to sacrifice their dearly-held values. What small business or nonprofit organization could financially survive a government investigation and a $150,000 penalty? AB 196 is grossly intolerant of religious freedom and the Boy Scouts. This radical bill engages in reverse discrimination and would do real harm to persons of conscience."
 
a 38 billion dollar debt, and this is all this state can think about?

these democrats/liberals are going to fuck up this state so bad, that once the republicans take over, it will be theirs for a LONG time.

here frackal, this is some current events that lay out how the left doesnt give a flying fuck about personal freedom.
 
And I agree with you, this is excessively moronic and intrusive.

But the Waco issue is still more important in overall scope IMO
 
Unbelievable. Why would you want to hire one of these fucking freaks? I would pnly hire one if i was in the business of testing for bio weapons or mine sweeping or something.
 
Hee hee it would be interesting to see who would be "detected" as a tranny and who would not.

The Transvestite Boy Scouts. Maybe they can have htier own troupe, instead of survival skills, football and cookie selling they can do, tap dancing, hair styling and ballet.

Ballet is very good for the legs y'know, Builds lots of endurance strength in the calves and hamstrings :).
 
p0ink said:
a 38 billion dollar debt, and this is all this state can think about?

This is the benefit of state's rights over federal control. The state of California can pass as much retarded legislation it and it's people wish, causing more people to leave and fewer new resident immigration (legal mind you), which will cause more financial hardships on the state. Those who move are moving to states that they feel are more conducive to their beliefs, while California will be an example of failed socialistic ideology.

If this were federally mandated, one would have to accept this or move to another country, which is less likely than simply moving to another state.
 
atlantabiolab said:


This is the benefit of state's rights over federal control. The state of California can pass as much retarded legislation it and it's people wish, causing more people to leave and fewer new resident immigration (legal mind you), which will cause more financial hardships on the state. Those who move are moving to states that they feel are more conducive to their beliefs, while California will be an example of failed socialistic ideology.

If this were federally mandated, one would have to accept this or move to another country, which is less likely than simply moving to another state.

Very true. I am waiting for this state to kick the bucket. But then liberals wouldnt accept responsibility anyway.
 
Too bad....California is truly a magnificent state from a geological and climatological viewpoint. If it were not so screwed up, perhaps everyone would live there.
 
what crap. I especially enjoy this communist/socialist statement.

"Every Californian deserves the right to a job and to a home. "We must do everything in our power to protect such fundamental human rights,"

I'd like to nominate a Benz and an SUV for next on the list of "Human Rights"
 
Top Bottom