Re: Best Back of all Time? You decide
In my oppinion, Dorian's back development is thicker than Colemans as far as individual musculature is concerned. However, Ronnie has a wider back, and better lat development. It's a tough call. As far as genetics go, I believe that Ronnie has the upper hand on this one, cause his back COULD be as thick as dorians. And if he puts dorians thickness and his own width together, THEN you would have the best back of all time. But right now, taking everything into consideration I think it is dead even.
In my oppinion, Dorian's back development is thicker than Colemans as far as individual musculature is concerned. However, Ronnie has a wider back, and better lat development. It's a tough call. As far as genetics go, I believe that Ronnie has the upper hand on this one, cause his back COULD be as thick as dorians. And if he puts dorians thickness and his own width together, THEN you would have the best back of all time. But right now, taking everything into consideration I think it is dead even.