Based on Numbers only what is lacking?

[cyrex]

So what is lacking here as far as size:
I'm
6'4"
~290lbs
~14% bf

19" arms
50" chest
28" legs
20" calves
14.5" forearms
36" waist
20" neck
58" shoulders

for fun, just assume i'm perfectly symetric (i'm not but it's not tough to tell which side needs work given the numbers)

So what needs work without looking at a pic?

I'm trying to compare what I think visually needs work compared to what ya'll say based on pure stats

 

[cyrex]

So what is lacking here as far as size:
I'm
6'4"
~290lbs
~14% bf

19" arms
50" chest
28" legs
20" calves
14.5" forearms
36" waist
20" neck
58" shoulders

for fun, just assume i'm perfectly symetric (i'm not but it's not tough to tell which side needs work given the numbers)

So what needs work without looking at a pic?

I'm trying to compare what I think visually needs work compared to what ya'll say based on pure stats

bump?

 

[Lifterforlife]

At 6'4" and 290, I would think you could have bigger than 19" arms. Probably bigger legs also, and that would indicate bigger calves.

 

[cyrex]

I was only about 280 when those measurements were taken..

 

[*Bunny*]

I see one very important measurement lacking ...

 

[cyrex]

I see one very important measurement lacking ...

what's that?

 

[cyrex]

ohhhh

6.5 inches

 

[Tweakle]

numbers mean nothing bro, it's all about bodyfat, muscle shape and bone structure

all that really matters is that you're happy with it.. fwiw my stats are pretty much the same as yours (my chest is a couple inches bigger, calfs are way smaller) and im almost 60lbs lighter than you, but I'm sure you would make me look tiny standing next to me.

post a pic on the members forum for crits

 

[*Bunny*]

what's that?

ok here's my take on your #'s ...

I don't know where you're putting that 290 pounds because I'm not seeing it in your muscles based on those #'s. #'s are SO deceiving so here goes ...

For a guy 290 @ 14%, the legs & arms seem a bit small so I'm like hmm something doesn't add up.

My thought process, some pros are 290 14% in the off season... 6'4" and a 36 waist where is the 290 pounds? Could it be in your legs? Well, not at 28 so it's not there. I'm guessing maybe 32-34 would be more understandable.

SO I was curious if you were missing a measurement somewhere ... sorry I thought it was funny.

I am NOT knocking you, just going off what you put out there & since my honey is 6'4 and I've seen him at 220 10% BF then up to 260 BF unknown

 

[cyrex]

ok here's my take on your #'s ...

I don't know where you're putting that 290 pounds because I'm not seeing it in your muscles based on those #'s. #'s are SO deceiving so here goes ...

For a guy 290 @ 14%, the legs & arms seem a bit small so I'm like hmm something doesn't add up.

My thought process, some pros are 290 14% in the off season... 6'4" and a 36 waist where is the 290 pounds? Could it be in your legs? Well, not at 28 so it's not there. I'm guessing maybe 32-34 would be more understandable.

SO I was curious if you were missing a measurement somewhere ... sorry I thought it was funny.

I am NOT knocking you, just going off what you put out there & since my honey is 6'4 and I've seen him at 220 10% BF then up to 260 BF unknown

hehe
Well:

1) The measurements were taken when I was at 280
2) I seem to carry weight very well. I seem to be very dense.
3) Those numbers are with no pump and not flexing . . .


I was asking more in lines of proportions than anything . . .