danielson said:
ok so they havent produced jobs
they have started numerous social programs to target obesity however. People with diabetic complications will continue to be treated by healthcare as otherwise they would die. The general public is unwilling to let that happen (death) and due to the free commercial leash given in your country and mine, sweets and high calorie food is served in high school cafeteria's everywhere.
"They haven't produced jobs" sure does sound a lot nicer than "their economy and standard of living has stagnated as socialist after socialist has gutted the economic heart of the country".
It is a failed attempt at Utopia, just like all the others. A disaster. But oh, look, they got 1 or 2 things right! They must be great. So what is the country produces no net wealth for 60 years?
Can you imagine what would happen to the US and world economies if America porduced no net jobs for 60 years? Only because Sweden is irrelevant to the world can it be such an abect economic failure.
Yes, in an ideal world their moms and pops should be telling them to eat right. but most likely there parents wont, and they are not mature enough to knwo that if they get trapped in an obesity lifestyle they will suffer!
You either own your body or you do not. I prefer to own it, not to be property of the state, which is what you are espousing.
the difference between the article nordy posted and what we do is they realised they are going to have a diabetes epidemic and they got a lid on it. this will SAVE money, yes it is government saying we have to spend money to save money but for centuries we have treated the symptoms of disease in an attempt to remove them from the public but have neglected to change the underlying causes.
Government is not an investment bank. it should not be making these kinds of decisions. it should be protecting rights....only. You are intimating that the state has rights, when it does not. Individuals have rights only.
All the cost of obesity goes away if the government gets out of the health care biz. And, guess what? prices go down.
You can if you want, revert to a purely capatalist society with no reign on what is peddled to kids, and no mass social programs,
How about: we own our own bodies, and property rights are enforced? I will settle for that. is that too much to ask?
you will get those who are sensible living well and provideing for their family, but you will also get massive social degeneration, a breakdown of social structure and as a result massive sequalae of deprivation (crime, drugs, teen pregnancy)...they will eventually have to be contained within walls to stop them robbing and pillaging others...far-fetched but entirely bprobable and predicted by many analysts as the rich-poor divide worsens
Sounds like modern day America.
The walls you describe are jails, and we have more people in them than every other countryt in the world. Wake up bro. it is already here, and government intervention into people's everyday lives is the reason.
This is not an economic thread, but it is labor laws that keep poor people poor, not capitalism. it is unions that drive everyone;s wages down, except the few inside it. Poverty is by its very defintion the absence of welath and therefore the
enemy of the free market
The free market seeks to create wealth, so by defintion it destroys poverty.
This is capitalism 101. why is this not taught in schools????? OH, I know. Teahcers are a special interest group,and here in the US, a powerful union.
, by helping them we aren;t only helping them but society and the environment as a whole. this appears to be a fundamental difference between europe and the us...and the way i think and you do. maybe (i hope not) when i'm earning $$$ i'll change but im guessing like you said its apples and oranges
Society is "everyone but me". Why would I want to be chained to that? I just want the chance to look out for me. Just me. I won't tell you what to do, and you don't tell me what to do. Seems fair, yes?