You used a lot of old Russian papers to say that your main ingredient worked.
Here is a more recent paper.
Usually, when there are positive results, the research papers EXPLODE, for example with things like creatine, nitric oxide, and the most recent promising supp, beta-alanine.
A more recent study
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2129166
Effects of Methoxyisoflavone, Ecdysterone, and Sulfo-Polysaccharide Supplementation on Training Adaptations in Resistance-Trained Males
Colin D Wilborn,1 Lemuel W Taylor,2 Bill I Campbell,3 Chad Kerksick,4 Chris J Rasmussen,3 Michael Greenwood,3 and Richard B Kreider3
1Human Performance Lab, University of Mary Hardin Baylor, Belton, TX
2Exercise Physiology Lab, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL
3Exercise and Sport Nutrition Laboratory, Baylor University, Waco, TX
4Applied Biochemistry and Molecular Physiology Laboratory, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Corresponding author.
Richard B Kreider:
[email protected]
Received September 8, 2006; Accepted November 16, 2006.
Methoxyisoflavone (M), 20-hydroxyecdysone (E), and sulfo-polysaccharide (CSP3) have been marketed to athletes as dietary supplements that can increase strength and muscle mass during resistance-training. However, little is known about their potential ergogenic value. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these supplements affect training adaptations and/or markers of muscle anabolism/catabolism in resistance-trained athletes.
Methods
Forty-five resistance-trained males (20.5 ± 3 yrs; 179 ± 7 cm, 84 ± 16 kg, 17.3 ± 9% body fat) were matched according to FFM and randomly assigned to ingest in a double blind manner supplements containing either a placebo (P); 800 mg/day of M; 200 mg of E; or, 1,000 mg/day of CSP3 for 8-weeks during training. At 0, 4, and 8-weeks, subjects donated fasting blood samples and completed comprehensive muscular strength, muscular endurance, anaerobic capacity, and body composition analysis. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA.
Results
No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in training adaptations among groups in the variables FFM, percent body fat, bench press 1 RM, leg press 1 RM or sprint peak power. Anabolic/catabolic analysis revealed no significant differences among groups in active testosterone (AT), free testosterone (FT), cortisol, the AT to cortisol ratio, urea nitrogen, creatinine, the blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio. In addition, no significant differences were seen from pre to post supplementation and/or training in AT, FT, or cortisol.
Conclusion
Results indicate that M, E, and CSP3 supplementation do not affect body composition or training adaptations nor do they influence the anabolic/catabolic hormone status or general markers of catabolism in resistance-trained males.
They say it doesn't work, however it may have something to do with the dosing.
Also, you only have 75 mg of ecdysterone in your supp. You do say you need to take 5 tablets, twice daily, so 7500 mg/day, however it does seem for the dosing to be effective, it needs to be taken more frequently, and with protien.
It seems you need to take 100mg-200mg of 95% 20 beta ecdysterone every hour or 2, throughout the day, up to amounts of 750mg-1200mg each day to get the best results, depending upon your bodyweight.
The reason for taking 95% 20 beta ecdysterone every hour or 2 throughout the day is that once you have taken it orally it only has a short life in your system to do its work which is around 2 hours and because its job is to make muscle by protein synthesis it has to be taken with protein, thefore if you take protein every hour take 100mg 95% beta edysterone ( 1 tablet ) with it and if you take protein every 2 hours then double the amount of beta ecdysterone ( 2 tablets ).
A link on this site about ecdysterone
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/bodybuilding-supplements/finally-truth-about-ecdysterone-689.html