Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Would killing the economy help the poor?

obamam-lol-y-u-mad-tho.jpg
 
http://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/obamam-lol-y-u-mad-tho.jpg?w=470


Anytime, people resort to childish games like this, it's a leading indicator they are mad and defeated.
Your come back was LOL, It seems to me all you know how to do is LOL...You are no fun..at all.
I guess I win again, like it would be any other way. Let me know when you get the balls to have a real face off.
 
Sure thing buddy.

Best part was how your response to a series of facts (with an article from a reputable news source confirming said facts) was this:

"Reasoning to your distorted thinking, your thinking is perfectly warped. You live under a tradition instead of reality, you live under the thinks of others, not your own. I woudn't live under the impact and influence of what you call civilization for all the money in the world."

Seriously, wtf is that?

Lemme guess, you are probably a birther and also think 9/11 was an inside job, right?
 
And I often cant help myself with the LOLs when dealing with folks like plunk and yourself. I honestly think that a good portion of the time plunk knows hes dead wrong yet refuses to concede even when faced with irrefutable evidence. Hence the lulz.

You, on the other hand, just seem deluded.

I bet you also think Obama is a closet socialist-marxist-fascist (without recognizing the massive contradiction in terms) who's sole mission is to destroy the US as we know it, right?
 
Sure thing buddy.

Best part was how your response to a series of facts (with an article from a reputable news source confirming said facts) was this:

"Reasoning to your distorted thinking, your thinking is perfectly warped. You live under a tradition instead of reality, you live under the thinks of others, not your own. I woudn't live under the impact and influence of what you call civilization for all the money in the world."

Seriously, wtf is that?

Lemme guess, you are probably a birther and also think 9/11 was an inside job, right?


Since you are serious, I'll give a serious response. You live under a tradition (generation tradition). What your family told you to believe not your own thinking. You watch too much tv and don't do enough research to find more than one source. You get one article and use it as a comprehensive tool, that's no good, you need to sift through all kinds of different data then make an evaluation. I can tell you don't, i'm not trying to belittle you, but I can tell.

I tryed to have a civilized debate with you, you turned it into a circus because you had no valuable input, so you resort to acting childish. Come on bro... nobody has all truth, everyone that posted gave good insight, and we can piece it together like that. I meant i wouldn't live under that kind of logic, nothing personal. You went right into a defense mode instead coming back with a strong arguement... I'm done over here again, too much conflict and silly baby crap..
 
Since you are serious, I'll give a serious response. You live under a tradition (generation tradition). What your family told you to believe not your own thinking. You watch too much tv and don't do enough research to find more than one source. You get one article and use it as a comprehensive tool, that's no good, you need to sift through all kinds of different data then make an evaluation. I can tell you don't, i'm not trying to belittle you, but I can tell.

I tryed to have a civilized debate with you, you turned it into a circus because you had no valuable input, so you resort to acting childish. Come on bro... nobody has all truth, everyone that posted gave good insight, and we can piece it together like that. I meant i wouldn't live under that kind of logic, nothing personal. You went right into a defense mode instead coming back with a strong arguement... I'm done over here again, too much conflict and silly baby crap..

*tried
 
Since you are serious, I'll give a serious response. You live under a tradition (generation tradition). What your family told you to believe not your own thinking. You watch too much tv and don't do enough research to find more than one source. You get one article and use it as a comprehensive tool, that's no good, you need to sift through all kinds of different data then make an evaluation. I can tell you don't, i'm not trying to belittle you, but I can tell.

I tryed to have a civilized debate with you, you turned it into a circus because you had no valuable input, so you resort to acting childish. Come on bro... nobody has all truth, everyone that posted gave good insight, and we can piece it together like that. I meant i wouldn't live under that kind of logic, nothing personal. You went right into a defense mode instead coming back with a strong arguement... I'm done over here again, too much conflict and silly baby crap..
Right. That's what happened here.

And lol at me getting all my info from TV and a lack of research on my own. I guess my Series 7, Series 24, CFP, and Level II CFA were all acquired via consistent CNBC watching.

You posted an extremely simplistic view about something and I called you out on it.

Lets do this:

- Fact of the matter is that corporations and wealthy individuals are paying a lower effective rate today (and have been over the past few years) than at almost any time previously.

Is that true or not? Hint: it's true. I looked it up.

- George Bush presided over one of the weakest economic "development" periods in 5 decades. During his term, we as a country had a net loss of private sector jobs. Absolutely no new private sector jobs were created during his 8 years. Poverty rates increased nearly 3% during his term.

Is that true or not? Hint: see above.

With those facts in mind, what argument do you have that the Bush tax cuts created this phantom boom economy that you referenced in this thread?
 
Or am I way off base due to the tradition of reality I'm currently living in?
 
Right. That's what happened here.

And lol at me getting all my info from TV and a lack of research on my own. I guess my Series 7, Series 24, CFP, and Level II CFA were all acquired via consistent CNBC watching.

You posted an extremely simplistic view about something and I called you out on it.

Lets do this:

- Fact of the matter is that corporations and wealthy individuals are paying a lower effective rate today (and have been over the past few years) than at almost any time previously.

Is that true or not? Hint: it's true. I looked it up.

- George Bush presided over one of the weakest economic "development" periods in 5 decades. During his term, we as a country had a net loss of private sector jobs. Absolutely no new private sector jobs were created during his 8 years. Poverty rates increased nearly 3% during his term.

Is that true or not? Hint: see above.

With those facts in mind, what argument do you have that the Bush tax cuts created this phantom boom economy that you referenced in this thread?


I gave a link, you said it wasn't good enough, so what's the point, you think your source is right. Again, you said you looked something up, it doesn't mean the source is totally right.

Go to the heritage Foundation. There is an article by Curtis Dubay called, Setting the Tax Record Straight: Clinton Hikes Slowed Growth, Bush Cuts Promoted recovery.

It has all the stats you need prior and after Bush's tenure...

Now, if you think your source is better than mine then don't bother to post back up.
 
Top Bottom