Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below The credited acronym would be TINTCR.
Intent is intent. Method does not absolve you, HTH.
Fiancees being sexually harraased at work
- Thread starter DesiringMass317
- Start date
The credited acronym would be TINTCR.
Intent is intent. Method does not absolve you, HTH.
PICK3
New member
exactly
saying the "n" word as a racial slur is intended to convey one message and calling one of your "e" boyzs "my ngr" means another
Amazon.com: The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language (P.S.) (9780061336461): Steven Pinker: Books
Agree completely. If not, why use it?
Whether I call you a faggot, geigh or fgt, the meaning does not change, no matter the rationalization or spelling or "jonsing". Now quit being a faggot and calling people niggers (or, quit bng a fgt+callin ppl ngrs). TYIA
PICK3
New member
Agree completely. If not, why use it?
Whether I call you a faggot, geigh or fgt, the meaning does not change, no matter the rationalization or spelling or "jonsing". Now quit being a faggot and calling people niggers (or, quit bng a fgt+callin ppl ngrs). TYIA
Are you questioning why "communities" develop their own vernacular?
Ibid.: Amazon.com: The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language (P.S.) (9780061336461): Steven Pinker: Books
PICK3
New member
Agree completely. If not, why use it?
Whether I call you a faggot, geigh or fgt, the meaning does not change, no matter the rationalization or spelling or "jonsing". Now quit being a faggot and calling people niggers (or, quit bng a fgt+callin ppl ngrs). TYIA
//str faulty parallel structure (a.k.a. faulty parallelism)
Purdue OWL: Parallel Structure
Hmm... if you read the entry, you will find it nonresponsive. This is moar semantics rather than mechanics, therefore your objection is overruled.
A better argument against me would have been, e.g., fallacy of presupposition, dicto simplicitor, ignoratio elenchi, et c.
PICK3
New member
Hmm... if you read the entry, you will find it nonresponsive. This is moar semantics rather than mechanics, therefore your objection is overruled.
A better argument against me would have been, e.g., fallacy of presupposition, dicto simplicitor, ignoratio elenchi, et c.
I like "e" debating moar with Plunkey
When he wins (which is a given) due to superior intellect, he doesn't feel the need to spike the football
just sayin'
Hint: I was giving a few (of many) examples of how my arguments could be considered invalid.
You did the same thing; I just listed logical (as opposed to grammatical/mechanical) fallacies that you probably haven't heard of (or copied/pasted they're latin names to seem smart or something, lol).
Okay, this flame has officially jumped teh shark. (Fitting for SHARK WEEK, no?
) What was the OP about again?
PICK3
New member
Similar threads
