Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

would you chose abs over size?

Nobledude

Well-known member
I know it would be ideal to be huge with razor sharp abs....Would you chose a huge phisique over one with great abs?

I am 6'2''and 210 lbs as of now and my abs are showing after I cut down and lost 10 lbs...nice to see those abs , though...
 
percentage wise, would be a fair assessment to say that abs are 40% genetics, 40% diet and 20% exercise?
 
I'd rather be big and strong than have abs.

I've leaned down enought to have abs before and it really wasn't that cool.

Cheers,
Scotsman
 
Scotsman said:
I'd rather be big and strong than have abs.

I've leaned down enought to have abs before and it really wasn't that cool.

Cheers,
Scotsman




Same here... for everything^^^
 
Nobledude said:
percentage wise, would be a fair assessment to say that abs are 40% genetics, 40% diet and 20% exercise?
For me it is 80% genetics and 20% exercise. The flip side to that is I'm never going to be huge due to genetics. I'm not complaining though, I'd take the abs over being huge.
 
alexmichael said:
For me it is 80% genetics and 20% exercise. The flip side to that is I'm never going to be huge due to genetics. I'm not complaining though, I'd take the abs over being huge.
I hear you..genetics were quite generous with you...some of us have to compensate the lack of good genetics with diet and exercise.
 
Is 210/220 huge? Jesus.
 
Nobledude said:
on the contrary, it is rather average....but when I was 220 my abs were barely showing.

Either way I chose huge...

I have never said to myself "jesus that guy has abs!"

But I have said "holy shit he is huge" (It was seeing cutler at a gold's - most would say this I think)
 
Nathan said:
If you are under 6' and around 5% then holy hell yes.
I doubt most people walk around at 5% for long.

If 5'9 I would agree 210/220 is huge.
 
yes Im 6,2 227 right now and trying to get abs going so Yes I would.. However I was planning a Jan bulking cycle.....So will see
 
Becoming said:
I doubt most people walk around at 5% for long.

If 5'9 I would agree 210/220 is huge.


I'm 5'9", 215 lbs, and low teens, BF wise. I'm definitely not huge.
 
give me the size
 
my bf is fine now and i dont have my abs very visible, but im decently sized for my height and hope to be bigger....

im a year round bulker
 
Size, defintly size. Abs are more for show and really have no value but to say how lean I am' I'd rather be 200-210 at 15% then at 180 or so at 10%. Im 186' at 5'7" right now, eventually plan on being 200 again in a year or so.
 
PICK3 said:
I'd give up size and def if I could have my hair on point everyday.
Richard's hair is "on point" every day.

Richard%20Simmons.jpg


Is it genetics or just a clever choice of hairstyle?

Richard Simmons is a misunderstood genius.
 
Nathan said:
If you are under 6' and around 5% then holy hell yes.

I was about to say the same thing

even 6'1-2" and 220 is pretty damn big
 
nope. a 6/8 pak is only visible without a shirt on, which is not possible most of the time, unless u live at the beach like lestat does.

a bigger guy, with bigger than average mass and size, but not overweight, will get noticed more often in normal, non-body building environments.


trust me, at 6-1, 240 pounds, 48 inch chest...........i know about this. a good friend, who is 5-10, 36 inch chest, 8% bf naturally (damn him! lol), with a 6 pak complains frequently that i get more long, intense looks than he does during normal, clothed situations. :)




i guess it's human nature to want what we don't have, hey?
 
I would have to say yes - I have resigned myself to the fact that I will never be a very large man, just not built that way, so I would take a 6 pack now.
 
SublimeZM said:
my bf is fine now and i dont have my abs very visible, but im decently sized for my height and hope to be bigger....

im a year round bulker
bf: body fat or boyfriend? lolol
 
rnch said:
nope. a 6/8 pak is only visible without a shirt on, which is not possible most of the time, unless u live at the beach like lestat does.

a bigger guy, with bigger than average mass and size, but not overweight, will get noticed more often in normal, non-body building environments.


trust me, at 6-1, 240 pounds, 48 inch chest...........i know about this. a good friend, who is 5-10, 36 inch chest, 8% bf naturally (damn him! lol), with a 6 pak complains frequently that i get more long, intense looks than he does during normal, clothed situations. :)



i guess it's human nature to want what we don't have, hey?

or it could be the 30 in circumference of your bald head that get the looks...
 
Nobledude said:
or it could be the 30 in circumference of your bald head that get the looks...
whatever works for you, schweathardt!:FRlol:
 
rnch said:
nope. a 6/8 pak is only visible without a shirt on, which is not possible most of the time, unless u live at the beach like lestat does.

a bigger guy, with bigger than average mass and size, but not overweight, will get noticed more often in normal, non-body building environments.


trust me, at 6-1, 240 pounds, 48 inch chest...........i know about this. a good friend, who is 5-10, 36 inch chest, 8% bf naturally (damn him! lol), with a 6 pak complains frequently that i get more long, intense looks than he does during normal, clothed situations. :)




i guess it's human nature to want what we don't have, hey?

I typically get looks of "oh my god it's godzilla" for those long looks.LOL

Cheers,
Scotsman
 
abs.

i'm 5'10", 170. broad shoulders and nice frame. i have the body that women go ga-ga over.

i could just bulk up and get big, and still have abs. But at 200+lbs, i just look like a muscle freak, and a turnoff for hot 20-something chicks. So for me, it's about getting tail and looking good - so i'll stick too my physique.

And funny, according to the army - 200+lbs, you'd be considered majorly obese and they wouldn't let you in.
 
Razorguns said:
abs.

i'm 5'10", 170. broad shoulders and nice frame. i have the body that women go ga-ga over.

i could just bulk up and get big, and still have abs. But at 200+lbs, i just look like a muscle freak, and a turnoff for hot 20-something chicks. So for me, it's about getting tail and looking good - so i'll stick too my physique.

And funny, according to the army - 200+lbs, you'd be considered majorly obese and they wouldn't let you in.


I can't remember the last time I weighed 170. You must have chicken legs.
 
jnevin said:
I can't remember the last time I weighed 170. You must have chicken legs.

nah. think ryan reynolds body or sean micheal scott type body. or even colin farrell.

r
 
Razorguns said:
nah. think ryan reynolds body or sean micheal scott type body. or even colin farrell.

r
so we should think of a Skinny Stick?
 
Top Bottom