javaguru said:You're touching on the leader, manager, follower dynamic. The leader creates the vision, the managers work to bring the vision to fruition and the followers do most of the dying.
I was talking to a political activist about this topic. It seems like this dynamic takes precedence over the ideals that install this dynamic. In order for a movement of any kind to take place, you need to rally masses of motto muttering, unthinking people.
He believes that he can use the strength of what he views as his rational arguments to get a movement underway. When has that been the case throughout history? Has there been a 'thinkingman's revolution'?