M
Mr.X
Guest
Ok, I need to correct myself, I was very "hot" when I wrote the reply.
Virtually, no women can get down below 12%bf without steroids. But, there are ALWAYS exception, I can't argue with genetics. Now, to prove my theory of 12%bf limit: I will tell everyone, basically, that every woman I have worked with had the problem of getting down below 12%bf (naturally, because I do not believe in steroid use by women). It was just impossible, no matter what we tried, it is a fact, in my view, that estrogen and progesterone is a part of this problem. However, when I did my study, I concluded that 70% of women over 30 had a problem getting under 15%bf. (only 500 women studied) I have yet to publish the results.
P.S. there is always that 30% of women that can achieve that goal
Mr.Xdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c80/a1c806efc07ba5d6b5c7c0f95df4b8582e42f115" alt="Cool :cool: :cool:"
Virtually, no women can get down below 12%bf without steroids. But, there are ALWAYS exception, I can't argue with genetics. Now, to prove my theory of 12%bf limit: I will tell everyone, basically, that every woman I have worked with had the problem of getting down below 12%bf (naturally, because I do not believe in steroid use by women). It was just impossible, no matter what we tried, it is a fact, in my view, that estrogen and progesterone is a part of this problem. However, when I did my study, I concluded that 70% of women over 30 had a problem getting under 15%bf. (only 500 women studied) I have yet to publish the results.
P.S. there is always that 30% of women that can achieve that goal
Mr.X
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c80/a1c806efc07ba5d6b5c7c0f95df4b8582e42f115" alt="Cool :cool: :cool:"