Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

when they killed Zarqawi

Maverick

New member
They had his house surrounded with special forces, then the F-16's dropped 2 bombs and killed everyone inside the house, including a child.......

my question is, why did they have to kill the child with the bomb ? couldnt the commando's just go inside and kill him and the people that needed to be killed ? or why not capture his ass and find out information from him ?

messed up
 
i never heard forces were around it.

would make no sense. when they bomb - troops are told to be the hell far away.
 
Razorguns said:
i never heard forces were around it.

would make no sense. when they bomb - troops are told to be the hell far away.

im watching anderson cooper right now, watch CNN
 
Maverick said:
im watching anderson cooper right now, watch CNN

people just making shit up. After the bombs, the first forces on the scene were iraqi.

us forces heard last second of his sighting, and re-directed af planes to bomb it before he moved again.

More importantly - will this FINALLY spell peace between Sunnis and the Shi'ites? If not, sunni insurgents will continue the insurgency.
 
Razorguns said:
people just making shit up. After the bombs, the first forces on the scene were iraqi.

us forces heard last second of his sighting, and re-directed af planes to bomb it before he moved again.

More importantly - will this FINALLY spell peace between Sunnis and the Shi'ites? If not, sunni insurgents will continue the insurgency.

seriously, they had the house surrounded, the jets were in no hurry.
 
Force begets force

another terrorist wil rise up in his stead...this isnt going to end anything
 
This guy sawed off the heads of civilians on videotape with dull knives, and circulated the tape to raise money to kill more. He bombed wedding parties and has been responsible for blowing up hundreds of civilian vehicles with women and children inside.

Instead of straining to find a reason to blame America how about giving some credit where credit is due?

One of the world's top terrorists is no more.

If this "safe house" was provided to Zarqawi by s family or village, they knowingly put the lives of them and their loved ones at risk.

If they were forced to use their property then they were the last victims of Zarqawi.
 
war is an ugly thing
but they dont need to be posting his dead body all over the television and having a goddamn fiesta about it.
So many horrible things have been done in the name of a "righteous cause"....here is another one...didnt some women and children die in the bombing?
 
Wulfgar said:
but they dont need to be posting his dead body all over the television

Had to be done to prevent misinformation and propaganda on the part of Al Jazeera, and sadly, our own liberal media.
 
And they say the war hasnt spilled into our streets...its all over our tv
merchants of fear....no wonder I stopped watching the news
 
Maverick said:
They had his house surrounded with special forces, then the F-16's dropped 2 bombs and killed everyone inside the house, including a child.......

my question is, why did they have to kill the child with the bomb ? couldnt the commando's just go inside and kill him and the people that needed to be killed ? or why not capture his ass and find out information from him ?

messed up
child would grow up to be a terrorreorrrist, or they just flipped a coin on that one and said tails and killed them all.
 
Maverick said:
im just quoting what they said on anderson 360 jagoff

i love when civilians second-guess military operations. they should stick to command & conquer.

they ever think no one knew there were kids inside? and in war, collateral damage is allowed. wars are not supposed to be pretty. yes virginia, women & children die in wars.
 
well, I am sure they knew who was inside the house..... but whatever, not like they are gonna hate the americans more then they already do now.

good luck with bush and the war, just another vietnam anyway.

oh and by the way, I am happy I am a civillain....... why would I go risk my life and take directions from a corrupt administration.

they should all pull out and go home to their family's....... it is not about freedom for the americans, it is about oil and political power.

let the Iraqi people sort their own shit out, it is their country
 
Maverick said:
oh and by the way, I am happy I am a civillain....... why would I go risk my life and take directions from a corrupt administration.

Count your blessings that you live in a country where you have that choice. It is a choice borne of strength, not weakness.
 
Maverick said:
well, I am sure they knew who was inside the house..... but whatever, not like they are gonna hate the americans more then they already do now.

good luck with bush and the war, just another vietnam anyway.

oh and by the way, I am happy I am a civillain....... why would I go risk my life and take directions from a corrupt administration.

they should all pull out and go home to their family's....... it is not about freedom for the americans, it is about oil and political power.

let the Iraqi people sort their own shit out, it is their country

why nto just say 'i'm against the war' instead of this facade of wanting to question military maneuvers from the comfort of your sofa?

i could smell your bias a mile away. people are so predictable and easy to read.

terrorists are on your soil. feel free to give him hippie hugs.
 
Razorguns said:
why nto just say 'i'm against the war' instead of this facade of wanting to question military maneuvers from the comfort of your sofa?

i could smell your bias a mile away. people are so predictable and easy to read.

terrorists are on your soil. feel free to give him hippie hugs.

will do
 
Maverick said:
well, I am sure they knew who was inside the house..... but whatever, not like they are gonna hate the americans more then they already do now.

good luck with bush and the war, just another vietnam anyway.

oh and by the way, I am happy I am a civillain....... why would I go risk my life and take directions from a corrupt administration.

they should all pull out and go home to their family's....... it is not about freedom for the americans, it is about oil and political power.

let the Iraqi people sort their own shit out, it is their country

Just keep an eye on your border, OK hippie?

I wouldn't trade the freedom my brothers/forefathers have fought for.

You shit on the country to your South, but are blanketed by it';s protection because the U.S. WILL act when the time comes.

If generations of Americans had your "draft-dodging" attitude, neither of us would be here.

Come out from the "left" for a minute and "thank" the people who have lost their lives so you can post on EF in relative safety, under a blanket of protection that was GIVEN to you.

You're Welcome.
 
Maverick said:
They had his house surrounded with special forces, then the F-16's dropped 2 bombs and killed everyone inside the house, including a child.......

my question is, why did they have to kill the child with the bomb ? couldnt the commando's just go inside and kill him and the people that needed to be killed ? or why not capture his ass and find out information from him ?

messed up

S.F. teams operate as small as 3 personel, most likely a small group pin pointed his location and called in coordinates. As far as a child dying its sad but does happen. Maybe his parent shouldn't have been a terrorist or supporter of terrorist.
 
nuthinbutagoodtym said:
Just keep an eye on your border, OK hippie?

I wouldn't trade the freedom my brothers/forefathers have fought for.

You shit on the country to your South, but are blanketed by it';s protection because the U.S. WILL act when the time comes.

If generations of Americans had your "draft-dodging" attitude, neither of us would be here.

Come out from the "left" for a minute and "thank" the people who have lost their lives so you can post on EF in relative safety, under a blanket of protection that was GIVEN to you.

You're Welcome.

How much you wanna bet Canadians would act MUCH different if they were next to England, as opposed to the US :)

canadians suckup everything american, but ungrateful as fuck i've noticed.
 
Razorguns said:
How much you wanna bet Canadians would act MUCH different if they were next to England, as opposed to the US :)

canadians suckup everything american, but ungrateful as fuck i've noticed.

careful you don't want to say things like that you might be bombed.....
 
nuthinbutagoodtym said:
Just keep an eye on your border, OK hippie?

I wouldn't trade the freedom my brothers/forefathers have fought for.

You shit on the country to your South, but are blanketed by it';s protection because the U.S. WILL act when the time comes.

If generations of Americans had your "draft-dodging" attitude, neither of us would be here.

Come out from the "left" for a minute and "thank" the people who have lost their lives so you can post on EF in relative safety, under a blanket of protection that was GIVEN to you.

You're Welcome.

I like america, I go down there all the time to shop........... I have no problem with the american people. I think your country is great.... I do have a problem with a corrupt administration that lies to it's own military and people about what the war is really about.

the wars in the past were different, I appreciate my grandfather dying in WW1, this war is not about the same things that the wars in the past were fought over. This war is about so much about oil it is not even funny !!!

why would I thank the people that have died in the IRAQI war, I feel sorry for those young people and there families...... they had no reason to be there in the first place. It is not their country, they should not be there......... the guy that your administration blames for 9/11 is not even there, he is laughing in the mountains somewhere in Afghanistan/Pakistan !!! Do you think that the War in Iraqi means I can be safe now in front of my computer ? are you serious ? when did Iraq invade the USA or Canada ? thats right never...... and you think the war in Afghanistan and Iraq will make us safer ? I dont think so, It will just make us more vunerable........ those crazy people will just have more reason to commit "jihad" on us.

WAR in this time = MONEY/POWER/CONTROL that is it

when the USA Military finally bails out of Iraq and realizes that they cannot change people's belief's that have been that way for thousand's of years, they can spend the billons of dollars they wasted on their healthcare system or immigration programs or education.

this is just another vietnam war, it is sad
 
Newbie210 said:
S.F. teams operate as small as 3 personel, most likely a small group pin pointed his location and called in coordinates. As far as a child dying its sad but does happen. Maybe his parent shouldn't have been a terrorist or supporter of terrorist.

so your blaming an innocent child for what his parents did ?

smart
 
Maverick said:
I like america, I go down there all the time to shop........... I have no problem with the american people. I think your country is great.... I do have a problem with a corrupt administration that lies to it's own military and people about what the war is really about.

the wars in the past were different, I appreciate my grandfather dying in WW1, this war is not about the same things that the wars in the past were fought over. This war is about so much about oil it is not even funny !!!

why would I thank the people that have died in the IRAQI war, I feel sorry for those young people and there families...... they had no reason to be there in the first place. It is not their country, they should not be there......... the guy that your administration blames for 9/11 is not even there, he is laughing in the mountains somewhere in Afghanistan/Pakistan !!! Do you think that the War in Iraqi means I can be safe now in front of my computer ? are you serious ? when did Iraq invade the USA or Canada ? thats right never...... and you think the war in Afghanistan and Iraq will make us safer ? I dont think so, It will just make us more vunerable........ those crazy people will just have more reason to commit "jihad" on us.

WAR in this time = MONEY/POWER/CONTROL that is it

when the USA Military finally bails out of Iraq and realizes that they cannot change people's belief's that have been that way for thousand's of years, they can spend the billons of dollars they wasted on their healthcare system or immigration programs or education.

this is just another vietnam war, it is sad


This is not another Vietnam, - find a new slogan.
So you only care about your own back yard?
You feel bad for one child in a house with Zarqawi, but not for the poor Mothers and children that Saddam "gassed" or "slaughtered"?
How about the U.S. just puts up a HUGE wall and closes off ALL it's borders to EVERY outsider?
I'd hate to be on your side - you'd be occupied within 5 years.

I'm done with this conversation.
Lefties always have problems, but NEVER solutions.

Hey - is that your real name? Or do you like Top Gun (now THAT would be hypocrytical)
 
nuthinbutagoodtym said:
This is not another Vietnam, - find a new slogan.
So you only care about your own back yard?
You feel bad for one child in a house with Zarqawi, but not for the poor Mothers and children that Saddam "gassed" or "slaughtered"?
How about the U.S. just puts up a HUGE wall and closes off ALL it's borders to EVERY outsider?
I'd hate to be on your side - you'd be occupied within 5 years.

I'm done with this conversation.
Lefties always have problems, but NEVER solutions.

Hey - is that your real name? Or do you like Top Gun (now THAT would be hypocrytical)

maybe we would be occupied but at least we would have water to drink and power to run our homes :lmao: you guys down south need our water and electricity

and I do like top gun, but only cuz i had a non sexual crush on tom cruise :)
 
nuthinbutagoodtym said:
This is not another Vietnam, - find a new slogan.
So you only care about your own back yard?
You feel bad for one child in a house with Zarqawi, but not for the poor Mothers and children that Saddam "gassed" or "slaughtered"?
How about the U.S. just puts up a HUGE wall and closes off ALL it's borders to EVERY outsider?
I'd hate to be on your side - you'd be occupied within 5 years.

I'm done with this conversation.
Lefties always have problems, but NEVER solutions.

Hey - is that your real name? Or do you like Top Gun (now THAT would be hypocrytical)

i am not left handed, I am right handed silly geeeesh :qt:
 
Maverick said:
maybe we would be occupied but at least we would have water to drink and power to run our homes :lmao: you guys down south need our water and electricity :)

and lumber. and oil. and we're the world's largest miner/exporter of uranium.
no bombs for them!
 
For someone to say they are happy because their sarcasm upsets people is sad to me. There is just no good reason for it IMO.

As an ex Special Forces Soldier that spent 18 months in the Gulf War, seeing the things that I saw, and not being able to do anything about it, (not from a soldier's standpoint, but from a human rights aspect.) is what is really upsetting.

The newb is kind of right, SF units are actually 12 men that can break off into smaller teams for "recon" and such. However, this does not mean that they can just kick in doors and spout off oneliners like Hollywood makes it seem. In the situation with Zarqawi, more than likely it was a full 12 man unit that was doing the tracking but again, that does not mean that they were sneaking around under the windows with the ability to see each and every movement that went on within. Most likely they were 1 to 2 miles away surveying the area and situation, especially in a tracking mode. It all happened very fast! Due to this, most likely they were tracking through visual and satellite surveilance from varying distances from over a mile away. All they had to do was "see" Zarqawi go into the house, verify this information and call in the strike. The call went to two fighters that were patrolling another area. Now this brings a point, for as fast as an air strike can happen, especially from f-16's, there is no way possible that a man loaded down with at least 80+ lbs of equipment, fatigued, needing water, and such could ever run or move fast enough to get far enough away to gain cover from a combined blast impact of 1,000lbs worth of explosives. This suggests, like I mentioned that they were quite some distance away while making verification that Zarqawi was in the house. Now if that was the case there could be a million different reasons for the soldiers NOT even knowing a child was inside, there was actually a woman killed in the blast as well. Like I said this whole thing went down within a matter of minutes. In a situation like this there are just too many diff variables to take into account to just say yes they knew and did it anyway.

The loss of life period is tragic, but all the more when it is a woman or a child. Sometimes this happens for what ever reason, it just depends where you stand as far as what you WANT to believe. But you should understand that we are fighting people that don't see it that way. For them to die for the cause is far more important than living for it, regaurdless if you are woman or child. This from men that have and will use women and children as human shields to save their own lives but say the child they just held up in front of them to take rounds to the face and head died a hero for their "cause". Or they say the woman they forced to insert C-4 explosives into her vagina so she can make it past a checkpoint explosives undetected to get into a marketplace so someone else could push a button and kill her and countless #'s of women, children, and elderly was an icon for the cause. That's right, not soldiers who could defend themselves, women, children, and elderly that were merely shopping or trying to make a living (I came in for support on the clean up for this one.).

So sometimes women and children do get caught up in the awful senario of war. Although it is a travesty that this happens, sometimes it is unavoidable. After all, How many times has Zarqawi and others escaped capture due to there being too many civilians (women, children, and elderly) being near? Now think, from the first time capture was avoided 'til this guys death, how many innocent people lost their lives period?

In the Gulf War, I had the misfortune of pulling recon in and around Bagdad....While doing this I saw public beheadings of women, children, and elderly, not for heinous crimes, but because they said something against the governing powers or their God. Or they just knew someone that did. Children were pulled from their beds and murderrd just because their parents thought a certain way or read certain books, and the dictatorship figured that the child will grow up to have the same beliefs as the parents. You know, seeing an elderly ladies eyes gouged out with a screw driver by hussien himself while hundreds cheered and not being able to do anything to stop it, any of it! This was and is fucked at best! And then having to pull out and watch this bastard kill thousands more innocent people over the next 11 years can really frustrate a persons idea of what he believes his Governments true motives are. This being said, there are OBVIOUSLY personal interests in Iraq, but it really does go beyond that, and in simplest form, how do you think the oil situation would affect the world populous if someone like hussien had control over the worlds oil supply?

It was stated that the U.S. is forcing it's beliefs on another nation.....So untrue! The implimentation of a democratic government for better or worse is not forcing ones beliefs on anyone! However, dictating what someone should read, listen to, believe, who they should worship, and killing them if they don't comply is.

Unfortunately in a war situation people die on both sides and even more unfortunately I have seen it up close. I do have to say that the U.S. does everything it can to avoid civilian casualties, sometimes it's unavoidable. Hell, in WWI you didn't see anybody warning civilians well in advance to vacate certain areas before a strike, some just need to be smart enough to get the hell out. Now what kind of advantage does that give the opposition? Because they hear the warnings too.

The comment was also made that there was gratefulness for a grandfather losing his life in WWI, then stating that if his country was "occupied, at least there would be water and power.".......Sorry, but that statement just destroyed and negated everything your Grandfather died fighting for! Of course this war is not for the exact same reason, but separate all of the whitewashed media whining and bullshit, and you'll find that hussien and hitler were really not unlike each other in the things they believed and the actions they had taken to enforce those beliefs on others.

If you are happy to be a civilian then be happy. Thats your choice and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. But by making that choice, don't assume that one government is any lees corrupt than another, when it comes to governmental corruption there really aren't degrees, it just is. And sorry to say but there really will never be a government anywhere ever that will not be corrupt for one reason or another in someones eyes. Hell, there never has been either.

The electricity thing weather you believe it or not is not a matter of the U.S. "needing" Canada's electricity.....Due to the deregulation of utilities in the North West region of The U.S. it is possible for States to allow other companies in to offer their product/service at a competetive rate and Canada is no different. The hydro-electricity that is supplied is actually excess electricity that gets sold to U.S. States because at times it is cheaper to buy from Canada than it is to produce it here, I won't forget to mention the fact that at certain other times Canada buys electricity from the U.S. for somewhat the same reason. So it's actually a fair trade off that keeps costs as low as possible instead of having drastic hikes in price (more than there already are.) throughout the year.

And the lumber thing is just good economic sense. I worked in a lumber supply store in Wisconsin when I was in college and about 30% of product came in from Canada. Now think, 30%, where would these companies be if they lost 30% of their revenue? How many jobs would be lost? What would happen to certain aspects of Canada's economy? IMO, it's win, win. The U.S. provides a demand and Canada fills it for a great cost. I mean the Canadian dollar hasn't been worth as much as the U.S. dollar since what the mid 70's.

I didn't write this to fuel a fire or to take sides, or even to declare one country is better than the next. I wrote it to add some tangible evidence to an exchange that was missing some facts. I have made a lot of great friends in Canada some from EF and I have even been there many times. I'm sure some of what I wrote will spark other questions, and possibly even some hostile return but oh well, that's part of what's great about FREEDOM!

Just don't think you are untouchable as Canada either....

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/06/news/canada.php

Because if and when something like this happens, Who ya gonna call!

This taking forever to write and I hope is not too jumbled as I am at work and typing when I get a chance. I'm sure I am leaving out some info. but I am also sure others will fill in the blanks.
 
Last edited:
Maverick said:
well, I am sure they knew who was inside the house..... but whatever, not like they are gonna hate the americans more then they already do now.

good luck with bush and the war, just another vietnam anyway.

oh and by the way, I am happy I am a civillain....... why would I go risk my life and take directions from a corrupt administration.

they should all pull out and go home to their family's....... it is not about freedom for the americans, it is about oil and political power.

let the Iraqi people sort their own shit out, it is their country


its exactly like Vietnam to the T isn't it. or we can just say it is cuz' everyone esle is.. RIght?

risk your life and take directions? why? If you need to ask that, Im glad you're a Canadian and not an American. I serve my country and I'm Proud of it, like many.

they should all go home? Many people want to be there because they know they are makin a difference....

the iraqi people are not strong enough to support themself so they need help. so we help.

if you dont want to help, sit the fuck down and shut up
 
The Dorf said:
its exactly like Vietnam to the T isn't it. or we can just say it is cuz' everyone esle is.. RIght?

risk your life and take directions? why? If you need to ask that, Im glad you're a Canadian and not an American. I serve my country and I'm Proud of it, like many.

they should all go home? Many people want to be there because they know they are makin a difference....

the iraqi people are not strong enough to support themself so they need help. so we help.

if you dont want to help, sit the fuck down and shut up

Nicely done.
 
i'm not "pro war" or anything, but canadians would feel much different about things had it been there building destroyed. was 9-11 related to iraq? we may never know, but al-zarkawi sure is related to osama and we saw what he did... the child would have been used as a shield had forces went inside...

and i also read that iraqi special forces were first on the scene... would seem odd for american special forces to surround it and let someone else in first. this had to be done if they couldnt catch him, and the way they are over there he probably would have killed himself before being taken.

fuck him.
 
Maverick said:
the wars in the past were different, I appreciate my grandfather dying in WW1, this war is not about the same things that the wars in the past were fought over. This war is about so much about oil it is not even funny !!!

Maverick said:
why would I thank the people that have died in the IRAQI war, I feel sorry for those young people and there families...... they had no reason to be there in the first place. It is not their country, they should not be there

Yeah, that attack on Canadian soil during WWI made it easier to justify.
 
Razorguns said:
How much you wanna bet Canadians would act MUCH different if they were next to England, as opposed to the US :)

canadians suckup everything american, but ungrateful as fuck i've noticed.


dullboy says don't forget that they send us all those wonderful comedians.
 
dullboy said:
dullboy says don't forget that they send us all those wonderful comedians.

That's right!

Dance showbiz monkey Dance!

Dance for the awful Americans!
 
Last edited:
Maverick said:
They had his house surrounded with special forces, then the F-16's dropped 2 bombs and killed everyone inside the house, including a child.......

my question is, why did they have to kill the child with the bomb ? couldnt the commando's just go inside and kill him and the people that needed to be killed ? or why not capture his ass and find out information from him ?

messed up


Do you think the woman and child would have felt better about the experience if they had been killed with bullets and mortars instead of bombs?

Just for the purposes of edification it should be pointed out that their "safe house" wasn't some shack in an Iraqi village but an actual heavily built structure designed for the precise purpose of giving them some shielding in the event of an attack.

Assuming of course they wouldnt have opened the front door and surrendered to US forces some fire fight would have likely ensued, risking not only the lives of our forces but presumably putting anyone in the immediate area in jeopardy as well. I somehow doubt the terrorists would have agreed to a ceasefire long enough for us to clear the area of all civilians to avoid collateral damage.

Perhaps they understand some things you're missing.
 
Hey guy's for a second put the fucking politics down, put down your facts and stats, and all that other shit you've heard on the news or in the books. Think P-E-O-P-L-E. People. Would you want another country in your country? Seriously, dont look at what THEY need. Fuck their problems. As an american, right now, would you want another country to just waltz and say, "hello, see my nice gun? Yeah, I run things around here"?
 
CEASAR said:
Hey guy's for a second put the fucking politics down, put down your facts and stats, and all that other shit you've heard on the news or in the books. Think P-E-O-P-L-E. People. Would you want another country in your country? Seriously, dont look at what THEY need. Fuck their problems. As an american, right now, would you want another country to just waltz and say, "hello, see my nice gun, I run things around here"?


Go to East L.A., it's already happened there.
 
CEASAR said:
Hey guy's for a second put the fucking politics down, put down your facts and stats, and all that other shit you've heard on the news or in the books. Think P-E-O-P-L-E. People. Would you want another country in your country? Seriously, dont look at what THEY need. Fuck their problems. As an american, right now, would you want another country to just waltz and say, "hello, see my nice gun? Yeah, I run things around here"?


Here I thought we were fostering an independent Iraqi government, elected by the citizenry with a constitution approved by same.

Hey we did do that.

But to answer your question I would imagine that would depend on what the situation was when we entered. I don't imagine very many people complain when the person saving their lives is someone who wasn't supposed to be there to begin with. If a police officer showed up to save your life during an armed robbery would you tell him to give the criminals back their guns and leave if you noticed he was out of his jurisdiction?

The point I'm making is that your example fails to reflect any realistic assessment of actual conditions on the ground in Iraq at the time of the invasion. You fail to appreciate the nature of a people being held hostage by a homicidal thug in their own country and instead portray it as just some silly people who have made errant life choices.
 
Phenom78 said:
Here I thought we were fostering an independent Iraqi government, elected by the citizenry with a constitution approved by same.

Hey we did do that.

But to answer your question I would imagine that would depend on what the situation was when we entered. I don't imagine very many people complain when the person saving their lives is someone who wasn't supposed to be there to begin with. If a police officer showed up to save your life during an armed robbery would you tell him to give the criminals back their guns and leave if you noticed he was out of his jurisdiction?

The point I'm making is that your example fails to reflect any realistic assessment of actual conditions on the ground in Iraq at the time of the invasion. You fail to appreciate the nature of a people being held hostage by a homicidal thug in their own country and instead portray it as just some silly people who have made errant life choices.

Good job trying to play on the emotions of 'saving the Iraqi people'.
 
Phenom78 said:
Yes blue

They are so besides the point after all.

Indeed they are. I throw up in my mouth every time I read someone saying this is all about 'saving the Iraqis'. Oh, look at the chivalrous Americans rushing to their rescue. What a crock.
 
Yes, it sucks that a child was in the house, but if you can take out a target without putting your people at further risk you take it out. They knew where he was, but they didn't know if the house or people in it were rigged with explosives.

And no, these deaths don't really change anything, especially since some of the information on his location came from members of his own group. It almost sounds like a mob war, and the US was used as the hitmen.
 
nuthinbutagoodtym said:
Just keep an eye on your border, OK hippie?

I wouldn't trade the freedom my brothers/forefathers have fought for.

You shit on the country to your South, but are blanketed by it';s protection because the U.S. WILL act when the time comes.

If generations of Americans had your "draft-dodging" attitude, neither of us would be here.

Come out from the "left" for a minute and "thank" the people who have lost their lives so you can post on EF in relative safety, under a blanket of protection that was GIVEN to you.

You're Welcome.
Uh....thanks for blowing up all those innocent civilians and children.
 
CEASAR said:
Hey guy's for a second put the fucking politics down, put down your facts and stats, and all that other shit you've heard on the news or in the books. Think P-E-O-P-L-E. People. Would you want another country in your country? Seriously, dont look at what THEY need. Fuck their problems. As an american, right now, would you want another country to just waltz and say, "hello, see my nice gun? Yeah, I run things around here"?

The majority of the people in Iraq are glad we are there, want us there, and are thankful we came. It just so happens that the majority are not the ones with the weapons. The U.S. never said nor implied that "we run things", the peoples freedom was snatched from the hands of a dictatorship and handed directly back to the people. It's not like we are talking about a peaceful Hobbit village, these people have probably almost never had a single generation that lived without the threat of death and destruction as part of daily life because of what they want to believe. It is futile at best for you to even think that the situation in Iraq can be assessed by comparing apples to oranges as your "think people" statement would suggest.

Everything that I have mentioned here comes from experiencing these "people" first hand. I'm not regurgitating something I read or heard because I am too weak minded and lazy to gather information and facts so I don't have to form my own opinion.
 
bluepeter said:
Indeed they are. I throw up in my mouth every time I read someone saying this is all about 'saving the Iraqis'. Oh, look at the chivalrous Americans rushing to their rescue. What a crock.


Yes Blue. Not like we spent countless billions building and upgrading their infrastructure.

Not as if we built schools, electric facilities, water and sewer treatement plants, hospitals etc etc all throughout the country

Don't let the facts interfere with your knee jerk, I hate that canada is smaller than you, anti US rants.
 
Razorguns said:
people just making shit up. After the bombs, the first forces on the scene were iraqi.

us forces heard last second of his sighting, and re-directed af planes to bomb it before he moved again.

More importantly - will this FINALLY spell peace between Sunnis and the Shi'ites? If not, sunni insurgents will continue the insurgency.

and clearly you are the expert because you were there :rolleyes:
 
Phenom78 said:
Yes Blue. Not like we spent countless billions building and upgrading their infrastructure.

Not as if we built schools, electric facilities, water and sewer treatement plants, hospitals etc etc all throughout the country

Don't let the facts interfere with your knee jerk, I hate that canada is smaller than you, anti US rants.

Do you understand the art of power and manipulation? Do you know what a smart person would do how wanted power? They'd pay there dues along the way, so they wouldn't appear too greedy. Too not appear as LARGE theif.To stay low key, you gotta give along the way. You ever pay attention to how a crook runs his operation? What put Al capone away in prison? Tax evasion. TAKE TAKE TAKE, and he got sent away. Do you understand what I'm saying?
 
Phenom78 said:
Yes Blue. Not like we spent countless billions building and upgrading their infrastructure.

Not as if we built schools, electric facilities, water and sewer treatement plants, hospitals etc etc all throughout the country

Don't let the facts interfere with your knee jerk, I hate that canada is smaller than you, anti US rants.

You really are a Knight riding to the rescue on your white horse. Forgive me for forgetting the obvious. Good show bringing emotion into the debate again with the asinine references to Canada and anti-Americanism. If you really want to believe that the US invaded Iraq to save the children, good for you. By the way, did you get the memo that Santa Claus is real?
 
nuthinbutagoodtym said:
Just keep an eye on your border, OK hippie?

I wouldn't trade the freedom my brothers/forefathers have fought for.

You shit on the country to your South, but are blanketed by it';s protection because the U.S. WILL act when the time comes.

If generations of Americans had your "draft-dodging" attitude, neither of us would be here.

Come out from the "left" for a minute and "thank" the people who have lost their lives so you can post on EF in relative safety, under a blanket of protection that was GIVEN to you.

You're Welcome.

What a load of shit.
 
patsfan1379 said:
dude they rope you in every time.

No, I just believe in putting out an alternative point of view. So no matter how often the talking heads on here try and belittle and degrade those that disagree with them, we're not going to shutup.
 
CEASAR said:
Do you understand the art of power and manipulation? Do you know what a smart person would do how wanted power? They'd pay there dues along the way, so they wouldn't appear too greedy. Too not appear as LARGE theif.To stay low key, you gotta give along the way. You ever pay attention to how a crook runs his operation? What put Al capone away in prison? Tax evasion. TAKE TAKE TAKE, and he got sent away. Do you understand what I'm saying?


I don't think you understand what you're saying.

I imagine what you are trying to say, however poorly, is that we are acting in our self interest by investing in the Iraqi people by buying local support with our deeds. Making it easier to do whatever else we our doing in the country.

Did I get that right?

What you fail to recognize is what our actual objectives in the region are broly. Use your head. Saddam offered 50 billion + in sweetheart oil deals to the french and others for the sole purpose of their committing to keep the US off his ass in the UN. Do you imagine for a second that no one in the US government was bright enough to think up a scenario where instead of giving the oil to the French, he would have gladly paid as much if not more to give it to us instead? It isn't rocket science. if all we wanted was the Iraqi oil we could have had it handed to us without ever firing a shot. Not only had it, but had them hand it over to whomever the administration chose.

That isn't some paranoid conspiracy theory (as you present) but actual documented calculations put into policy by the Russians, French, and Germans among others. It represents a status quo view of world politics which places short term economic benefit ahead of both long term implications and the real human suffering others will go through to make it a reality.

You need to learn to comprehend (for the benefit of wootool) that perceived self interest and doing the right thing are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Our self interst in Iraq was manifold. It allows us the nearer term ability to exit Kuwait and Saudi Arabia when our forcesd are no longer required as a bufffer to Iraq. It places a democratic regime in the heart of the muslim world as a thorn in the side of the regions despots. It removes a fundamental barrier that stood in the way of any diplomatic solution to an Israeli/Palestinian peace. It removes a major state sponsor of terrorism from the world stage. It provides an alternative to this end times isalmo fascist philosophy which permeates the region.

And not least importantly it is a warning to all the state sponsors of terrorism that we will no longer simply chase your proxies, but will come after you directly, if you deem to use terrorism as a form of polciy by proxy against the US and our interests.

Yet none of that negates that it was also the right thing to do. The saddest part of the latest political paradigm is that the liberals in the world have effectively become the main proponents of maintaining tyrrany. they parrot all the same "don't rock the boat" arguments they once despised.
 
bluepeter said:
No, I just believe in putting out an alternative point of view. So no matter how often the talking heads on here try and belittle and degrade those that disagree with them, we're not going to shutup.

your "alternative point of view" seems to be belittling people who don't agree with you. And you in turn turn into a talking head.

Kind of like when people think they are unique because they are goth. But actually they are just like all the other goth guys.
 
Phenom78 said:
Do you think the woman and child would have felt better about the experience if they had been killed with bullets and mortars instead of bombs?

Just for the purposes of edification it should be pointed out that their "safe house" wasn't some shack in an Iraqi village but an actual heavily built structure designed for the precise purpose of giving them some shielding in the event of an attack.

Assuming of course they wouldnt have opened the front door and surrendered to US forces some fire fight would have likely ensued, risking not only the lives of our forces but presumably putting anyone in the immediate area in jeopardy as well. I somehow doubt the terrorists would have agreed to a ceasefire long enough for us to clear the area of all civilians to avoid collateral damage.

Perhaps they understand some things you're missing.

Yes, It shows alot of concern for your child..to fortify your house and abed a terroist there...plus chances are he or she would have grown up to be a terrorist anyhow.......It's a simple case of "the sins of a Father"....
 
patsfan1379 said:
your "alternative point of view" seems to be belittling people who don't agree with you. And you in turn turn into a talking head.

Kind of like when people think they are unique because they are goth. But actually they are just like all the other goth guys.

lol

There are certain posters who shall remain nameless that are the ones with the constantly condescending, belittling posts. I never debate in that manner unless I am debating against someone with that 'superior' attitude.
 
bluepeter said:
lol

There are certain posters who shall remain nameless that are the ones with the constantly condescending, belittling posts. I never debate in that manner unless I am debating against someone with that 'superior' attitude.

i know what you mean :)

just easy to fall into their methods to get your point across. :)
 
swolenole said:
Yes, It shows alot of concern for your child..to fortify your house and abed a terroist there...plus chances are he or she would have grown up to be a terrorist anyhow.......It's a simple case of "the sins of a Father"....


People watch too many movies. I think they imagine we have some special Super Rambo force which can effortlessly enter a heavily armed and fortified building and surgicaly take out only those occupants who are terrorists without any collateral damage or risk to themselves.

We just chose not to use them because were mean spirited.
 
Bah

I actually assumed someone on the other side had taken the care to report actual facts instead of just more false propoganda.

In other words I have no excuse.
 
Phenom78 said:
Bah

I actually assumed someone on the other side had taken the care to report actual facts instead of just more false propoganda.

In other words I have no excuse.

Lol, gotta watch those who have an agenda, if its in their favor they report it. I actually hope they all get crabs.
 
Phenom78 said:
Bah

I actually assumed someone on the other side had taken the care to report actual facts instead of just more false propoganda.

In other words I have no excuse.

Media sensationalism strikes again.
 
blood for oil........

ok that one was strictly for adding fuel to this fire.........

but I still stand by what I said.
 
Maverick said:
blood for oil........

ok that one was strictly for adding fuel to this fire.........

but I still stand by what I said.


You stand behind your claim that they bombed a baby?

"my question is, why did they have to kill the child with the bomb ? couldnt the commando's just go inside and kill him and the people that needed to be killed ? or why not capture his ass and find out information from him ?"

The obvious answer to your question is they didn't
 
Phenom78 said:
You stand behind your claim that they bombed a baby?

"my question is, why did they have to kill the child with the bomb ? couldnt the commando's just go inside and kill him and the people that needed to be killed ? or why not capture his ass and find out information from him ?"

The obvious answer to your question is they didn't

well that and the other things I said in this thread
 
Maverick said:
well that and the other things I said in this thread


LOL

Yes

Why be deterred by actual facts on the ground. Little things like there was no child present in the building.
 
Phenom78 said:
LOL

Yes

Why be deterred by actual facts on the ground. Little things like there was no child present in the building.

Would you go parading about killing a child or keep it hush hush to aid your efforts?

Make sure what you think is fact is actually fact..
 
CEASAR said:
Would you go parading about killing a child or keep it hush hush to aid your efforts?

Make sure what you think is fact is actually fact..


By your standard of logic we can simply assume anything at all happened and represent it as the truth regardless of generally accepted facts. Which in practice appears to be exactly how liberals reach most of their conclusions in life.
 
Phenom78 said:
By your standard of logic we can simply assume anything at all happened and represent it as the truth regardless of generally accepted facts. Which in practice appears to be exactly how liberals reach most of their conclusions in life.

As do Catholics.
 
Phenom78 said:
By your standard of logic we can simply assume anything at all happened and represent it as the truth regardless of generally accepted facts. Which in practice appears to be exactly how liberals reach most of their conclusions in life.

My friend, I'm not saying deny everything they throw at you and assume it's all one big conspiracy. That's not what I'm saying. Just be open minded. The governement has a lot of power and resources, it's not far fetched for them to lie to sustain power. And I assure you, they arent going to tell you something if it works against them.
 
bluepeter said:
As do Catholics.


The obvious difference Peter being that catholics represent their beliefs as matters of faith. Strange that so many have such difficulty with such a simple distinction.

For your edification here is an example of the difference.

"I believe one day BluePeter will be able to discern the difference between matters of faith and statements of fact."

The above is a belief. It is based on an unevidenced faith that one day even you will mature enough intellectually to understand that there is a difference between representing something as a provable fact as opposed to an issue of faith.

"BluePeter doesn't comprehend the difference between facts and faith"

That's a fact which can be evidenced, unlike a belief in God, by the your post quoted above.
 
CEASAR said:
My friend, I'm not saying deny everything they throw at you and assume it's all one big conspiracy. That's not what I'm saying. Just be open minded. The governement has a lot of power and resources, it's not far fetched for them to lie to sustain power. And I assure you, they arent going to tell you something if it works against them.

Ceasar.

It is generally considered appropriate to have some basis for a claim in contradiction of accepted fact beyond "welll it coulda happened."

You could be Martian. Anything is possible. But before I encourage people to shoot you as an alien invader it might be considerd polite to offer some evidence of my claim prior to shooting.
 
Phenom78 said:
The obvious difference Peter being that catholics represent their beliefs as matters of faith. Strange that so many have such difficulty with such a simple distinction.

For your edification here is an example of the difference.

"I believe one day BluePeter will be able to discern the difference between matters of faith and statements of fact."

The above is a belief. It is based on an unevidenced faith that one day even you will mature enough intellectually to understand that there is a difference between representing something as a provable fact as opposed to an issue of faith.

"BluePeter doesn't comorehend the difference between facts and faith"

That's a fact which can be evidenced, unlike a belief in God, by the your post quoted above.

Sure Jersey, whatever you say. If you want to continue posting and contradicting your own logic in thread after thread, have at it. That along with your ridiculous superiority complex reflects very well on you and the ilk you deign to represent.

By the way, rhetorical question for you. What kind of a loser is so desperate for gratification, acceptance and validation that he gets banned from an Internet chat board and then comes back under a pseudonym?

P.S. - If you cannot see that believers intertwine facts and faith to support what they purport to be fact i.e. their religious dogma, you're even more deficient than I thought.
 
bluepeter said:
Sure Jersey, whatever you say. If you want to continue posting and contradicting your own logic in thread after thread, have at it. That along with your ridiculous superiority complex reflects very well on you and the ilk you deign to represent.

By the way, rhetorical question for you. What kind of a loser is so desperate for gratification, acceptance and validation that he gets banned from an Internet chat board and then comes back under a pseudonym?

P.S. - If you cannot see that believers intertwine facts and faith to support what they purport to be fact i.e. their religious dogma, you're even more deficient than I thought.


Blue

You're being your usual knee jerk self. You need to start taking some anti E's

The issue of intertwining fact and faith is absurd.

It is commonly understood by everyone involved that belief in God is a matter of faith. It can't be proven. That doesn't make it invalid. Just unprovable. It is properly reserved for those matters to which the answer cannot be known.

Thinking your child might still be alive after he or she has gone missing is a matter of faith. Thinking your child is still alive when the body is lying in the casket in front of you is a delusion.

Seperately whether or not a child was or wasn't present in the building is a knowable question. To claim one was, in contradiction of all updated reports, and with no basis for the belief, is equally a delusion.

These aren't difficult concepts except apparently to you and those like you.
 
Phenom78 said:
Blue

You're being your usual knee jerk self. You need to start taking some anti E's

The issue of intertwining fact and faith is absurd.

It is commonly understood by everyone involved that belief in God is a matter of faith. It can't be proven. That doesn't make it invalid. Just unprovable. It is properly reserved for those matters to which the answer cannot be known.

Thinking your child might still be alive after he or she has gone missing is a matter of faith. Thinking your child is still alive when the body is lying in the casket in front of you is a delusion.

Seperately whether or not a child was or wasn't present in the building is a knowable question. To claim one was, in contradiction of all updated reports, and with no basis for the belief, is equally a delusion.

These aren't difficult concepts except apparently to you and those like you.


how is mixing faith and logic absurd ? please explain
 
Top Bottom