Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

whats the longest cycle you ever been on?

stockked

New member
TRYING TO FIND OUT HOW MANY WEEKS HAS ANYONE BEEN ON A CYCLE?I HEARD SOMEONE BEING ON A CYCLE FOR 6 MONTHS,BUT EVERY TWO MONTHS HE WOULD CHANGE ESTERS,EXAMPLE-WEEK1-8-SOS250 DECA200MGS EOD/WEEK 9-16-T400- EQ200-EOD/WEEK17-24 TREN100MGS PRIMO 100MGS EOD,THEN USE HCG TO TIE LOOSE ENDS,WHAT DO YOU BROS THINK?:fro:
 
I think longer cycle yield better results....Do some research on Dave Palumbo and his views on cycling
 
muscleup said:
I think longer cycle yield better results....Do some research on Dave Palumbo and his views on cycling
THATS KIND OF FUNNY CUZ I E-MAILED HIM, AND HE ALSO TOLD ME YOU KEEP MOST OF THE GAINS,ON A PRO LONG CYCLE LIKE THE ONE I MENTION,VERY INTERESTING,..JUST TRYING TO SEE IF ANYONE TRIED THIS 6 MONTH CYCLE THEORY WITH OR WITHOUT ANY INCREASE IN SIDE EFFECTS?:confused:
 
stockked said:
THATS KIND OF FUNNY CUZ I E-MAILED HIM, AND HE ALSO TOLD ME YOU KEEP MOST OF THE GAINS,ON A PRO LONG CYCLE LIKE THE ONE I MENTION,VERY INTERESTING,..JUST TRYING TO SEE IF ANYONE TRIED THIS 6 MONTH CYCLE THEORY WITH OR WITHOUT ANY INCREASE IN SIDE EFFECTS?:confused:
could you give me his e-mail...I would like to discuss something with him...How soon did he get in touch with you ?
 
My current cycle is going to be 6 months long. I usually run cycles between 4-6 months. I am currently on 100mg anadrol/day for first 6 weeks, with 6I.U.s of HGH EOD, &50mg sust/week, 75-100mg fina/EOD. Gains have been great, and I agree with the comment about keeping more of your gains from longer cycles. That was one of the reasons I began doing longer cycles.
 
Latamier said:
My current cycle is going to be 6 months long. I usually run cycles between 4-6 months. I am currently on 100mg anadrol/day for first 6 weeks, with 6I.U.s of HGH EOD, &50mg sust/week, 75-100mg fina/EOD. Gains have been great, and I agree with the comment about keeping more of your gains from longer cycles. That was one of the reasons I began doing longer cycles.
YOUR CYCLE SOUNDS GREAT,WAS THERE ANY INCREASE IN SIDE EFFECTS?AND HOW MUCH BODY WEIGHT AND BODY STRENGHT DID YOU KEEP?:confused:
 
so is a 6 month cycle more effective then 2, 3 month cycles with a 2 month or so break in between. if you can gain say 15lbs of muscle and keep it off each 3 months cycle for a total of 30lbs, would you gain more then that on a 6 month strait cycle and hold it when you get off.

also, after 6 months on, how hard of a crash is there comein off, and how long do you stay off for.
 
getting off a 6 month cycle in 3 weeks....I've completely changed my physique....it cost me a shitload of money but was well worth it....I'll stay on the GH and bridge with slin and hit another cycle at the end of August......
 
I've been on for about a year and a half. I'm not really sure how long my longest cycle was... over a year... maybe two.

I'll be on for at least 2 1/2 years this time... don't really plan on ever going off.
 
SofaGeorge said:
I've been on for about a year and a half. I'm not really sure how long my longest cycle was... over a year... maybe two.

I'll be on for at least 2 1/2 years this time... don't really plan on ever going off.
are you shitting me ???...How old are you ?
 
is it necessary to use growth hormone in a 6 month cycle, or could one get great result without it. also, can you hold the gains from a longer cycle without a bridge.
 
gilly6993 said:
getting off a 6 month cycle in 3 weeks....I've completely changed my physique....it cost me a shitload of money but was well worth it....I'll stay on the GH and bridge with slin and hit another cycle at the end of August......
THATS WHAT I SAID MY CYCLE IS GOIN TO COST ME AT LEAST 3,000GRAND,THATS WHY A LOT OF PRO BODYBUILDERS DONT TALK ABOUT THE LENGHT OF THE CYCLE?CUZ A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE GET GOOD RESULTS,MAYBE THERE SCARED OF THE COMPETITION,JUST MY 0.02CENTS:fro:
 
Bro,

I am a firm believer in long cycles but my idea of long is 16 weeks lol... I find this to be the perfect length for me for it is moderately safe (dosage and types used are some factors) and the gains are usually the real muscle gains we are looking for, not the quick water gains we get at the beginnings that we wind up lossing lol (I know breath lol)... I also recover well after 16 weeks almost as well as an 8 week cycle... Longer then that IMO starts to cause longer term problems to build, One could argue the point but this is my opinion...

Take care bro

BBB
 
Dude I feel like a pussy now. Longest for me was 13 weeks. I consider that to be to long also. 8 weeks is the norm for me. 2 cycles per year.

Mavy
 
SofaGeorge,

what has the cycle you've been on consisted of? Also, at what age did you start using aas? Health problems?
 
Re: SofaGeorge,

jhphd said:
what has the cycle you've been on consisted of? Also, at what age did you start using aas? Health problems?

I've never had any health problems related to AAS... and I've nver met anyone in 20 year who has had ANY health problems related to AAS. Health problems related to AAS are a myth. If anything they are extremely good for you.

I started juicing at about 24-25.

There is no "base" to my cycle. I shake it up every 8-12 weeks. Started on test and d-bol... then deca and EQ... then fina and whinny... then I sort of lost track. I'm on deca, EQ and d-bol now.
 
I know a guys whos been on now 3 years and looks insane.

I dont know about 3 years but the cycles i do r always moderate and last longer then most peoples cycles.
I feel like this way i get less help from the juice and actually do some on my own, that way when im done i dont crash as hard.
I dont know but i feels this works best for me?
 
most of the guys i talk to with great physiques tell me that they made their best gains when they ran cycles for about a year. I'm young so im gonna run this one until i feel like im not gaining anymore. It was supposed to be 10 weeks, now ots been 13, its gonna be about 24 or so. Im sure ill bounce back and prolly look great doing it.
 
Re: Re: SofaGeorge,

SofaGeorge said:


I've never had any health problems related to AAS... and I've nver met anyone in 20 year who has had ANY health problems related to AAS. Health problems related to AAS are a myth. If anything they are extremely good for you.

I started juicing at about 24-25.

There is no "base" to my cycle. I shake it up every 8-12 weeks. Started on test and d-bol... then deca and EQ... then fina and whinny... then I sort of lost track. I'm on deca, EQ and d-bol now.
What about testicular atrophy? Do you do anything to combat that?
 
Bigbillybear said:
Bro,

I am a firm believer in long cycles but my idea of long is 16 weeks lol... I find this to be the perfect length for me for it is moderately safe (dosage and types used are some factors) and the gains are usually the real muscle gains we are looking for, not the quick water gains we get at the beginnings that we wind up lossing lol (I know breath lol)... I also recover well after 16 weeks almost as well as an 8 week cycle... Longer then that IMO starts to cause longer term problems to build, One could argue the point but this is my opinion...

Take care bro

BBB

Same opinion.
If you use a longer cycle, you recovery time it will be longer too. In some muscle mag talking about a post recovery teraphy to two bodybuilders that stay in gear for almost two straight year. The dosage an length in time of post teraphy were amazing. One of them had to stay with recover for almost one year.
Personally I want to recover normal hormonal level as soon as possible. Cosmetic and social reasons
 
Re: Re: Re: SofaGeorge,

plornive said:
What about testicular atrophy? Do you do anything to combat that?

I may be some kind of anathma. I never get it. I use small amounts of HCG periodically throughout cycle... 1,000iu every other day for a week or so.
 
powerforward said:
he states earlier in this thread that he has been on know for 1 year and a half. in the carao thread he said he was 43, in this thread he said he was 44. the carao thread is a little old.

Uh yeah... it was from Oct 2002. R U Cronologically challegened or what?
 
ok not quite a year, ask sofageorge maybe his dates are off a little. i didn't really pay attention to when the cararo thread was posted, just looked up the age that sg said he was in both threads.
 
the reason people "cycle" is because after a certain amount of time (6-12 weeks depending on the drug) time the results deminish and you don't grow as much.
 
Iv been on for six months now, I change up the drug/drugs every 8 weeks.
 
I've been on for 2 years now.

Fonz
 
ruffian3 said:
[B:confused:

says here you had been off for quite some time. Which is it? [/B]

That was my own fuck up. I corrected it later. I had finished a high dose fina/test/d-bol portion of the cycle and then was coasting on low dose deca/EQ. It was my own leap of logic that low dosing was being "off." Nelson Montana firmly made the point that "bridging" on low dose doesn't exist. It is simply not going off at all. My pattern is to high dose... then low dose. Usually high dose for 8 weeks low dose for 12. Hence, if I follow Nelson's factual interpretation... I don't go off at all.

I did stop using every thing for 4-6 weeks. Nada. Which I've noted in other posts... but given the briefness of that as an off period... I think it is easier to say that I've been on for a year and a half.

I posted the full break down of what I've been on the last year on one of Nelson's threads. It's anybody's call if how they want to interpret my time.
 
Fonz said:
I've been on for 2 years now.

Fonz

Are you seeing gains? I definitely am. I just hit a PR on deads today... did two reps more than my previous best with my work set weight.

I know this is going to sound stupid... but I think something really kicks in after a year.
 
SofaGeorge said:


Are you seeing gains? I definitely am. I just hit a PR on deads today... did two reps more than my previous best with my work set weight.

I know this is going to sound stupid... but I think something really kicks in after a year.

Gains?

During soccer season...no, not really. :)

Off-season...I swell up from 174lbs 6% to 195lbs 9% in about 5-6 weeks.

Fonz
 
Hmm, fonz I read in your earlier post that you don't plan on staying for life and haven't decided yet if you will go on hrt or not ... and I believe you are young too. How do you plan on getting your hpta back?

Thanks.

-sk
 
sk* said:
Hmm, fonz I read in your earlier post that you don't plan on staying for life and haven't decided yet if you will go on hrt or not ... and I believe you are young too. How do you plan on getting your hpta back?

Thanks.

-sk

I already planned that out 1 year ago. They asked me the same thing at CEM.

If you had $5K and access to a lot of "supplements" I would tell you. :)

LOL

No, my method is just very expenisve. Definately not viable for most people.

Fonz
 
SofaGeorge said:


That was my own fuck up. I corrected it later. I had finished a high dose fina/test/d-bol portion of the cycle and then was coasting on low dose deca/EQ. It was my own leap of logic that low dosing was being "off." Nelson Montana firmly made the point that "bridging" on low dose doesn't exist. It is simply not going off at all. My pattern is to high dose... then low dose. Usually high dose for 8 weeks low dose for 12. Hence, if I follow Nelson's factual interpretation... I don't go off at all.

I did stop using every thing for 4-6 weeks. Nada. Which I've noted in other posts... but given the briefness of that as an off period... I think it is easier to say that I've been on for a year and a half.

I posted the full break down of what I've been on the last year on one of Nelson's threads. It's anybody's call if how they want to interpret my time.

I see. I just happened to be reading some posts about carao before this one and I was a little confused. Wasn't really trying to play detective or anything:D
 
FONZ, SOFAGEORGE...

outta curiosity as i've never extended any cycle past 10 weeks..
at what point do gains begin to diminish?
 
ruffian3 said:


I see. I just happened to be reading some posts about carao before this one and I was a little confused. Wasn't really trying to play detective or anything:D

No... I didn't think you were. I actually posted a big apology about this months ago. It was my own stupidity. I don't want to use the word "denial" but even I have trouble explaining why I would consider 300mg a week of deca and 400mg a week of EQ being "off." It's what most people consider a cycle.

I tend to juice at 1,500-2,000mgs a week of test with whatever else thrown in while on high dose cycling. It's wierd to explain but low dosing really did seem off to me.
 
satchboogie said:
FONZ, SOFAGEORGE...

outta curiosity as i've never extended any cycle past 10 weeks..
at what point do gains begin to diminish?

I'm not sure they do deminish. I've been going up in strength all year... and the quality of my look seems to be getting better all year.

I think you definitely stop seeing rapid gains after 12 weeks... but I think even a year later you gain easier than if you were working out natural.
 
Fonz said:


I already planned that out 1 year ago. They asked me the same thing at CEM.

If you had $5K and access to a lot of "supplements" I would tell you. :)

LOL

No, my method is just very expenisve. Definately not viable for most people.

Fonz

Well bro, you yourself say you like to see advancement in bodybuilding so you like trying new thing, but as you know they may not work all the time. Wouldn't it be dissapointing if you do spend that $5,000 but then in the end it doesn't help your hpta, I mean not like you know for sure it will work as it hasn't been tried before.

Seriously, once I get to 40 I will be looking into HRT, but I am too young for it now. IMO ... and I don't see any real reasons to play games with our lives. JMHO though.

-sk
 
what would you guys think about this? For a first time user, after a 10wk cycle, going off for about 4 weeks, maybe less, and then hoping right back on and stay on an extended cycle, for say 20 weeks?

Chris
 
khemix said:
what would you guys think about this? For a first time user, after a 10wk cycle, going off for about 4 weeks, maybe less, and then hoping right back on and stay on an extended cycle, for say 20 weeks?

Chris

What's the point? Sticking to more common styles of cycling is more ideal when starting out IMO, as they are the most tried ones.

-sk
 
I was on test for 6 months....No serious sides....just alittle acne with clomid.....:D
 
Top Bottom