Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Weed, fights and guns: Trayvon Martin’s text messages released

PICK3

New member
500x500


Gun, drug texts feature in new Trayvon Martin shooting evidence - CNN.com


No racist!
 
Of course not CNN never releases relative information, from the story I heard Zimmerman was acting from self defense, he may have been a nut job but everyone has a right to protect him self.
 
Okay, but does this really weigh on the fact that he was murdered, or killed in defense?

It is relevant as it lends credibility to claims of him being a bad kid and mindset at time of incident.

If he was setting up a drug deal with guns etc dont you think that makes zimmermans claims that he was beat up sound more credible? Or do punk thugs always just walk down the street saying "Yessir" and "No sir"?

The facts of the case will be known one way or another, as much as the media does not want it
 
Of course not CNN never releases relative information, from the story I heard Zimmerman was acting from self defense, he may have been a nut job but everyone has a right to protect him self.

Leaving the safety of your Vehicle, against 911 instructions, chasing after someone WITH A GUN IN YOUR HAND, then shooting them hardly qualifies as self defense. It doesn't matter if the kid was Hitler.
 
We now know that Zimmerman was injured by Martin. That no witness challenges Zimmerman's account.
That Martin was a "gangsta" (his own words!). That Martin did not call for help. Even with a cell phone in his hands, he didn't call 911. There is a reason they didn't charge Zimmerman until politics got involved. They have no case.
Right off the bat, they knew it.
Two people fight and one gets killed - you know they are going to use self defense. So you must have evidence that it wasn't . Please cite any evidence that it wasn't. You can't. You have got to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Something like a witness, or physical evidence.

Forget the character of these two - seems like they both have issues - but how would you DISPROVE what Zimmerman said happened? I have yet to hear that. Be honest, with no new evidence, they decided to charge him for political reasons months later. That's just not how it works. When they have a good case, they charge rapidly, or when they get new evidence.
 
If Casey Anthony walked, this dude will walk.

Lack of evidence, just like pdaddy said.

The court system doesn't give a fuck about he said/she said unless it can be backed by facts
 
It is relevant as it lends credibility to claims of him being a bad kid and mindset at time of incident.

If he was setting up a drug deal with guns etc dont you think that makes zimmermans claims that he was beat up sound more credible? Or do punk thugs always just walk down the street saying "Yessir" and "No sir"?

The facts of the case will be known one way or another, as much as the media does not want it

This is a case of Zimmerman's defense attorneys poisoning the jury pool in FL. That evidence would never be admitted in court so they got it released to the press prior to the trial.
 
Top Bottom